Cargando…

118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC

BACKGROUND: Ninety percent of patients who report penicillin (PCN) allergy are not truly allergic. Penicillin skin testing (PST) followed by oral challenge (OC) with amoxicillin (AMX) can evaluate unconfirmed PCN allergy. PST is taxing and requires trained staff, while OC is an acceptable alternativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piazza, Michael J, Lichtenberger, Paola, Bjork, Lauren, Lazo-Vasquez, Alex, Hoang, Minh, Temino, Viviana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644593/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.320
_version_ 1784610121866805248
author Piazza, Michael J
Lichtenberger, Paola
Bjork, Lauren
Lazo-Vasquez, Alex
Hoang, Minh
Temino, Viviana
author_facet Piazza, Michael J
Lichtenberger, Paola
Bjork, Lauren
Lazo-Vasquez, Alex
Hoang, Minh
Temino, Viviana
author_sort Piazza, Michael J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ninety percent of patients who report penicillin (PCN) allergy are not truly allergic. Penicillin skin testing (PST) followed by oral challenge (OC) with amoxicillin (AMX) can evaluate unconfirmed PCN allergy. PST is taxing and requires trained staff, while OC is an acceptable alternative in patients with low-risk histories, who can safely undergo OC without PST. OC is performed in the outpatient Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MVAMC) setting. Collaboration between Allergy, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP), and Hospital Medicine identified patients with low-risk histories and offered OC to inpatients. METHODS: A daily report of MVAMC inpatients with PCN allergy was reviewed for appropriateness of OC (Fig 1). Hospice patients and those medically unstable or unable to consent were excluded. Appropriate consenting patients were challenged with AMX 500mg PO and observed for 60 minutes. If no reaction resulted, the PCN allergy label was removed. Epinephrine and diphenhydramine were available in case of adverse reaction. Those who were not OC candidates were offered outpatient PST (Fig 1). Figure 1. Penicillin allergy history evaluation algorithm [Image: see text] RESULTS: We evaluated 39 inpatients with PCN allergy from 3/10 - 5/27/21. Median age was 68 years; 94.9% were male (Table 1). The most common recorded reaction was unknown (Table 2). Thirteen (33.3%) did not qualify for OC, 7 (17.9%) refused, 2 (5.1%) were receiving a penicillin-derivative, 1 (2.6%) patient’s primary team refused consult, 2 (5.1%) patients were discharged prior to OC. Fourteen (38%) patients underwent OC with 0 adverse reactions; 0 patients required epinephrine or diphenhydramine. After OC, 5 patients had changes to their antibiotic regimen as a result of a negative OC. Limitations included 5 patients on beta-blockers, and 5 patients unable to consent. Table 1. Demographics of Evaluated Inpatients, N = 39 (%) [Image: see text] Note that 1 patient out of the 39, underwent DPC with cefpodoxime 200mg PO instead of amoxicillin for a reported allergy to ceftriaxone. Table 2. Reported Reactions, N = 41 (%) [Image: see text] Total N exceeds evaluated patient number as one patient reported multiple reactions to receiving penicillin. CONCLUSION: Removing unnecessary PCN allergy labels using inpatient OC with AMX is safe and effective for those with low-risk allergy histories. Zero patients undergoing OC developed a reaction, suggesting that OC may be safely performed per our algorithm. Our protocol does not require specialized training and is reproducible in settings without an Allergy specialist. In the 3 months prior to this program there were 0 inpatient consults to evaluate PCN. Future plans include forming a multidisciplinary consult service. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86445932021-12-06 118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC Piazza, Michael J Lichtenberger, Paola Bjork, Lauren Lazo-Vasquez, Alex Hoang, Minh Temino, Viviana Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ninety percent of patients who report penicillin (PCN) allergy are not truly allergic. Penicillin skin testing (PST) followed by oral challenge (OC) with amoxicillin (AMX) can evaluate unconfirmed PCN allergy. PST is taxing and requires trained staff, while OC is an acceptable alternative in patients with low-risk histories, who can safely undergo OC without PST. OC is performed in the outpatient Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MVAMC) setting. Collaboration between Allergy, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP), and Hospital Medicine identified patients with low-risk histories and offered OC to inpatients. METHODS: A daily report of MVAMC inpatients with PCN allergy was reviewed for appropriateness of OC (Fig 1). Hospice patients and those medically unstable or unable to consent were excluded. Appropriate consenting patients were challenged with AMX 500mg PO and observed for 60 minutes. If no reaction resulted, the PCN allergy label was removed. Epinephrine and diphenhydramine were available in case of adverse reaction. Those who were not OC candidates were offered outpatient PST (Fig 1). Figure 1. Penicillin allergy history evaluation algorithm [Image: see text] RESULTS: We evaluated 39 inpatients with PCN allergy from 3/10 - 5/27/21. Median age was 68 years; 94.9% were male (Table 1). The most common recorded reaction was unknown (Table 2). Thirteen (33.3%) did not qualify for OC, 7 (17.9%) refused, 2 (5.1%) were receiving a penicillin-derivative, 1 (2.6%) patient’s primary team refused consult, 2 (5.1%) patients were discharged prior to OC. Fourteen (38%) patients underwent OC with 0 adverse reactions; 0 patients required epinephrine or diphenhydramine. After OC, 5 patients had changes to their antibiotic regimen as a result of a negative OC. Limitations included 5 patients on beta-blockers, and 5 patients unable to consent. Table 1. Demographics of Evaluated Inpatients, N = 39 (%) [Image: see text] Note that 1 patient out of the 39, underwent DPC with cefpodoxime 200mg PO instead of amoxicillin for a reported allergy to ceftriaxone. Table 2. Reported Reactions, N = 41 (%) [Image: see text] Total N exceeds evaluated patient number as one patient reported multiple reactions to receiving penicillin. CONCLUSION: Removing unnecessary PCN allergy labels using inpatient OC with AMX is safe and effective for those with low-risk allergy histories. Zero patients undergoing OC developed a reaction, suggesting that OC may be safely performed per our algorithm. Our protocol does not require specialized training and is reproducible in settings without an Allergy specialist. In the 3 months prior to this program there were 0 inpatient consults to evaluate PCN. Future plans include forming a multidisciplinary consult service. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644593/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.320 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Piazza, Michael J
Lichtenberger, Paola
Bjork, Lauren
Lazo-Vasquez, Alex
Hoang, Minh
Temino, Viviana
118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC
title 118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC
title_full 118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC
title_fullStr 118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC
title_full_unstemmed 118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC
title_short 118. Feasibility of a Proactive Amoxicillin Oral Challenge Program for Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy at the Miami VAMC
title_sort 118. feasibility of a proactive amoxicillin oral challenge program for inpatients with penicillin allergy at the miami vamc
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644593/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.320
work_keys_str_mv AT piazzamichaelj 118feasibilityofaproactiveamoxicillinoralchallengeprogramforinpatientswithpenicillinallergyatthemiamivamc
AT lichtenbergerpaola 118feasibilityofaproactiveamoxicillinoralchallengeprogramforinpatientswithpenicillinallergyatthemiamivamc
AT bjorklauren 118feasibilityofaproactiveamoxicillinoralchallengeprogramforinpatientswithpenicillinallergyatthemiamivamc
AT lazovasquezalex 118feasibilityofaproactiveamoxicillinoralchallengeprogramforinpatientswithpenicillinallergyatthemiamivamc
AT hoangminh 118feasibilityofaproactiveamoxicillinoralchallengeprogramforinpatientswithpenicillinallergyatthemiamivamc
AT teminoviviana 118feasibilityofaproactiveamoxicillinoralchallengeprogramforinpatientswithpenicillinallergyatthemiamivamc