Cargando…

231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND: The use of oral (PO) antibiotics and lipoglycopeptides are challenging the previous standard of osteomyelitis (OM) treatment, but there is currently a paucity of comparative data between these approaches. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OM treated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stumphauzer, Alex, Moenster, Ryan P, Linneman, Travis W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644635/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.433
_version_ 1784610131469664256
author Stumphauzer, Alex
Moenster, Ryan P
Linneman, Travis W
author_facet Stumphauzer, Alex
Moenster, Ryan P
Linneman, Travis W
author_sort Stumphauzer, Alex
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of oral (PO) antibiotics and lipoglycopeptides are challenging the previous standard of osteomyelitis (OM) treatment, but there is currently a paucity of comparative data between these approaches. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OM treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics, PO antibiotics, or lipoglycopeptides between January 1, 2010 and June 1, 2020. Patients in the PO group could receive no more than 14 days of IV antibiotics prior to the PO course, and inclusion into the lipoglycopeptide group required at least 2 doses of drug to be administered. The primary outcome was occurrence of clinical failure within six months of completion of therapy, which was defined as new antibiotics or unplanned surgical intervention for an infection at the same site. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital length of stay (LOS), amputation within 6 months of therapy completion, and incidence of drug and line-related adverse effects. Previous osteomyelitis at index site, surgical intervention as a part of initial management, presence of Staphylococcus aureus on culture, utilization of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) services (IV group only), and concomitant PO therapy (lipoglycopeptide group only) were included in a bivariate analysis and variables with a p-value < 0.2 were included in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: The IV group included 257 patients, while the PO and lipoglycopeptide groups included 20 and 15 patients respectively. In the IV group, 89 (35%) of the patients experienced clinical treatment failure compared to 5 (25%) in the PO group and 5 (33%) in the lipoglycopeptide group (p=0.71). Median LOS was significantly shorter in the PO group compared to the IV and LGP groups [1 day (IQR 0-2.5) vs. 7 days (IQR 4-10) and 4 days (IQR 4-9), p=0.003]. No difference between groups was observed for amputation within 6 months or incidence of adverse effects. The only variable included in the multivariate regression model was previous osteomyelitis at index site [OR 1.75, 95% CI (1.07 – 2.87)]. CONCLUSION: PO and lipoglycopeptide therapy resulted in similar outcomes compared to IV antibiotics. Only previous OM at the same site was identified as an independent risk factor for failure. DISCLOSURES: Ryan P. Moenster, Pharm.D., FIDSA, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Melinta (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86446352021-12-06 231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis Stumphauzer, Alex Moenster, Ryan P Linneman, Travis W Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The use of oral (PO) antibiotics and lipoglycopeptides are challenging the previous standard of osteomyelitis (OM) treatment, but there is currently a paucity of comparative data between these approaches. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OM treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics, PO antibiotics, or lipoglycopeptides between January 1, 2010 and June 1, 2020. Patients in the PO group could receive no more than 14 days of IV antibiotics prior to the PO course, and inclusion into the lipoglycopeptide group required at least 2 doses of drug to be administered. The primary outcome was occurrence of clinical failure within six months of completion of therapy, which was defined as new antibiotics or unplanned surgical intervention for an infection at the same site. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital length of stay (LOS), amputation within 6 months of therapy completion, and incidence of drug and line-related adverse effects. Previous osteomyelitis at index site, surgical intervention as a part of initial management, presence of Staphylococcus aureus on culture, utilization of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) services (IV group only), and concomitant PO therapy (lipoglycopeptide group only) were included in a bivariate analysis and variables with a p-value < 0.2 were included in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: The IV group included 257 patients, while the PO and lipoglycopeptide groups included 20 and 15 patients respectively. In the IV group, 89 (35%) of the patients experienced clinical treatment failure compared to 5 (25%) in the PO group and 5 (33%) in the lipoglycopeptide group (p=0.71). Median LOS was significantly shorter in the PO group compared to the IV and LGP groups [1 day (IQR 0-2.5) vs. 7 days (IQR 4-10) and 4 days (IQR 4-9), p=0.003]. No difference between groups was observed for amputation within 6 months or incidence of adverse effects. The only variable included in the multivariate regression model was previous osteomyelitis at index site [OR 1.75, 95% CI (1.07 – 2.87)]. CONCLUSION: PO and lipoglycopeptide therapy resulted in similar outcomes compared to IV antibiotics. Only previous OM at the same site was identified as an independent risk factor for failure. DISCLOSURES: Ryan P. Moenster, Pharm.D., FIDSA, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Melinta (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644635/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.433 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Stumphauzer, Alex
Moenster, Ryan P
Linneman, Travis W
231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis
title 231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis
title_full 231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis
title_fullStr 231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis
title_full_unstemmed 231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis
title_short 231. Retrospective Comparison of Intravenous Therapy, Oral Therapy, and Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis
title_sort 231. retrospective comparison of intravenous therapy, oral therapy, and lipoglycopeptides for the treatment of osteomyelitis
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644635/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.433
work_keys_str_mv AT stumphauzeralex 231retrospectivecomparisonofintravenoustherapyoraltherapyandlipoglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofosteomyelitis
AT moensterryanp 231retrospectivecomparisonofintravenoustherapyoraltherapyandlipoglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofosteomyelitis
AT linnemantravisw 231retrospectivecomparisonofintravenoustherapyoraltherapyandlipoglycopeptidesforthetreatmentofosteomyelitis