Cargando…
71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
BACKGROUND: C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644681/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.273 |
_version_ | 1784610141802332160 |
---|---|
author | Qamar, Zahra Spacek, Lisa A Coppock, Dagan Patel, Kaya L’Etoile, Nathan Huang, Jingwen Arya, Akanksha Flomenberg, Phyllis |
author_facet | Qamar, Zahra Spacek, Lisa A Coppock, Dagan Patel, Kaya L’Etoile, Nathan Huang, Jingwen Arya, Akanksha Flomenberg, Phyllis |
author_sort | Qamar, Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospital introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set (OS). METHODS: In a 926-bed, teaching hospital, we conducted a 3-step intervention to improve CD diagnostic stewardship. (1) A retrospective analysis of CD orders before and after OS implementation was done to assess its impact on inappropriate orders. The OS included two questions: (a) Did patient have ≥ 3 loose bowel movements in past 24 hours? and (b) No laxatives in past 24 hours? An appropriate order was defined if “yes” to both questions. It was still appropriate if “no” to either question but ≥ 2 unexplained following features: fever > 100.4 F, abdominal pain, megacolon, ileus or leukocytosis > 11,000 cells/mm(3) in prior day. (2) After implementation of OS, house staff compliance with OS was surveyed via email. (3) Rationale for inappropriate orders was discussed with providers. RESULTS: Of 238 patients in retrospective analysis, 44% were ≥ 65 years and 37% had other potential causes of diarrhea. Common clinical features were leukocytosis (40%) and fever (31%). There was no significant difference in inappropriate testing: pre-OS 27/99 (27%) vs post-OS 44/139 (32%) (p=0.47). Of 43 house officers who participated in the survey, 75% indicated they over rode the OS. When asked to provide rationale of inappropriate CD testing, providers acknowledged inappropriate ordering but did not want to miss a CD diagnosis and frequently overlooked other causes of diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Appropriate CD testing relies on providers’ appreciation of a clinical picture consistent with CD infection, confirmation of clinically significant diarrhea, and consideration of other causes of diarrhea. Providers order inappropriate tests, not due to lack of knowledge, but likely fear of missing diagnosis and overlooking other causes of diarrhea. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8644681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86446812021-12-06 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing Qamar, Zahra Spacek, Lisa A Coppock, Dagan Patel, Kaya L’Etoile, Nathan Huang, Jingwen Arya, Akanksha Flomenberg, Phyllis Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospital introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set (OS). METHODS: In a 926-bed, teaching hospital, we conducted a 3-step intervention to improve CD diagnostic stewardship. (1) A retrospective analysis of CD orders before and after OS implementation was done to assess its impact on inappropriate orders. The OS included two questions: (a) Did patient have ≥ 3 loose bowel movements in past 24 hours? and (b) No laxatives in past 24 hours? An appropriate order was defined if “yes” to both questions. It was still appropriate if “no” to either question but ≥ 2 unexplained following features: fever > 100.4 F, abdominal pain, megacolon, ileus or leukocytosis > 11,000 cells/mm(3) in prior day. (2) After implementation of OS, house staff compliance with OS was surveyed via email. (3) Rationale for inappropriate orders was discussed with providers. RESULTS: Of 238 patients in retrospective analysis, 44% were ≥ 65 years and 37% had other potential causes of diarrhea. Common clinical features were leukocytosis (40%) and fever (31%). There was no significant difference in inappropriate testing: pre-OS 27/99 (27%) vs post-OS 44/139 (32%) (p=0.47). Of 43 house officers who participated in the survey, 75% indicated they over rode the OS. When asked to provide rationale of inappropriate CD testing, providers acknowledged inappropriate ordering but did not want to miss a CD diagnosis and frequently overlooked other causes of diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Appropriate CD testing relies on providers’ appreciation of a clinical picture consistent with CD infection, confirmation of clinically significant diarrhea, and consideration of other causes of diarrhea. Providers order inappropriate tests, not due to lack of knowledge, but likely fear of missing diagnosis and overlooking other causes of diarrhea. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644681/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.273 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Qamar, Zahra Spacek, Lisa A Coppock, Dagan Patel, Kaya L’Etoile, Nathan Huang, Jingwen Arya, Akanksha Flomenberg, Phyllis 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing |
title | 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing |
title_full | 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing |
title_fullStr | 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing |
title_short | 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing |
title_sort | 71. diagnostic stewardship of clostridioides difficile testing |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644681/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qamarzahra 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT spaceklisaa 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT coppockdagan 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT patelkaya 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT letoilenathan 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT huangjingwen 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT aryaakanksha 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting AT flomenbergphyllis 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting |