Cargando…

71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing

BACKGROUND: C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qamar, Zahra, Spacek, Lisa A, Coppock, Dagan, Patel, Kaya, L’Etoile, Nathan, Huang, Jingwen, Arya, Akanksha, Flomenberg, Phyllis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644681/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.273
_version_ 1784610141802332160
author Qamar, Zahra
Spacek, Lisa A
Coppock, Dagan
Patel, Kaya
L’Etoile, Nathan
Huang, Jingwen
Arya, Akanksha
Flomenberg, Phyllis
author_facet Qamar, Zahra
Spacek, Lisa A
Coppock, Dagan
Patel, Kaya
L’Etoile, Nathan
Huang, Jingwen
Arya, Akanksha
Flomenberg, Phyllis
author_sort Qamar, Zahra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospital introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set (OS). METHODS: In a 926-bed, teaching hospital, we conducted a 3-step intervention to improve CD diagnostic stewardship. (1) A retrospective analysis of CD orders before and after OS implementation was done to assess its impact on inappropriate orders. The OS included two questions: (a) Did patient have ≥ 3 loose bowel movements in past 24 hours? and (b) No laxatives in past 24 hours? An appropriate order was defined if “yes” to both questions. It was still appropriate if “no” to either question but ≥ 2 unexplained following features: fever > 100.4 F, abdominal pain, megacolon, ileus or leukocytosis > 11,000 cells/mm(3) in prior day. (2) After implementation of OS, house staff compliance with OS was surveyed via email. (3) Rationale for inappropriate orders was discussed with providers. RESULTS: Of 238 patients in retrospective analysis, 44% were ≥ 65 years and 37% had other potential causes of diarrhea. Common clinical features were leukocytosis (40%) and fever (31%). There was no significant difference in inappropriate testing: pre-OS 27/99 (27%) vs post-OS 44/139 (32%) (p=0.47). Of 43 house officers who participated in the survey, 75% indicated they over rode the OS. When asked to provide rationale of inappropriate CD testing, providers acknowledged inappropriate ordering but did not want to miss a CD diagnosis and frequently overlooked other causes of diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Appropriate CD testing relies on providers’ appreciation of a clinical picture consistent with CD infection, confirmation of clinically significant diarrhea, and consideration of other causes of diarrhea. Providers order inappropriate tests, not due to lack of knowledge, but likely fear of missing diagnosis and overlooking other causes of diarrhea. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86446812021-12-06 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing Qamar, Zahra Spacek, Lisa A Coppock, Dagan Patel, Kaya L’Etoile, Nathan Huang, Jingwen Arya, Akanksha Flomenberg, Phyllis Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: C. difficile (CD) testing is frequently ordered inappropriately. Highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can detect CD colonization leading to misdiagnosis. Providers often overlook other causes of diarrhea, notably laxatives. To improve diagnostic stewardship, our hospital introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set (OS). METHODS: In a 926-bed, teaching hospital, we conducted a 3-step intervention to improve CD diagnostic stewardship. (1) A retrospective analysis of CD orders before and after OS implementation was done to assess its impact on inappropriate orders. The OS included two questions: (a) Did patient have ≥ 3 loose bowel movements in past 24 hours? and (b) No laxatives in past 24 hours? An appropriate order was defined if “yes” to both questions. It was still appropriate if “no” to either question but ≥ 2 unexplained following features: fever > 100.4 F, abdominal pain, megacolon, ileus or leukocytosis > 11,000 cells/mm(3) in prior day. (2) After implementation of OS, house staff compliance with OS was surveyed via email. (3) Rationale for inappropriate orders was discussed with providers. RESULTS: Of 238 patients in retrospective analysis, 44% were ≥ 65 years and 37% had other potential causes of diarrhea. Common clinical features were leukocytosis (40%) and fever (31%). There was no significant difference in inappropriate testing: pre-OS 27/99 (27%) vs post-OS 44/139 (32%) (p=0.47). Of 43 house officers who participated in the survey, 75% indicated they over rode the OS. When asked to provide rationale of inappropriate CD testing, providers acknowledged inappropriate ordering but did not want to miss a CD diagnosis and frequently overlooked other causes of diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Appropriate CD testing relies on providers’ appreciation of a clinical picture consistent with CD infection, confirmation of clinically significant diarrhea, and consideration of other causes of diarrhea. Providers order inappropriate tests, not due to lack of knowledge, but likely fear of missing diagnosis and overlooking other causes of diarrhea. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644681/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.273 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Qamar, Zahra
Spacek, Lisa A
Coppock, Dagan
Patel, Kaya
L’Etoile, Nathan
Huang, Jingwen
Arya, Akanksha
Flomenberg, Phyllis
71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
title 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
title_full 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
title_fullStr 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
title_full_unstemmed 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
title_short 71. Diagnostic Stewardship of Clostridioides difficile Testing
title_sort 71. diagnostic stewardship of clostridioides difficile testing
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644681/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.273
work_keys_str_mv AT qamarzahra 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT spaceklisaa 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT coppockdagan 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT patelkaya 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT letoilenathan 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT huangjingwen 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT aryaakanksha 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting
AT flomenbergphyllis 71diagnosticstewardshipofclostridioidesdifficiletesting