Cargando…
268. Methicillin Sensitive Versus Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nosocomial Meningitis
BACKGROUND: Herein, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of the methicillin sensitive (MS) versus methicillin resistant (MR) culture-proven Staphylococcus spp. nosocomial meningitis (S-NM) in our setting. METHODS: We extracted data and outcomes for all adult patients (age >18 years) consulted by the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.470 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Herein, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of the methicillin sensitive (MS) versus methicillin resistant (MR) culture-proven Staphylococcus spp. nosocomial meningitis (S-NM) in our setting. METHODS: We extracted data and outcomes for all adult patients (age >18 years) consulted by the Infectious Diseases Consultants and diagnosed NM (developed at a compatible time according to CDC nosocomial meningitis definitions) between January 2006 and 2021 and fulfilled the following study inclusion criteria: (a) Age ≥18-year-old; (b) CSF culture is positive for Staphylococcus spp. (c) Presence of at least two of three clinical/laboratory criteria as meningitis findings: (i) Body temperature >38(o)C; (ii) CSF finding; >250 leucocytes/mm(3); (iii) at least one of the following clinical findings, ie. impairment of consciousness, neck stiffness, nausea/vomiting. Identification of the infecting bacteria and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility were performed using the VITEK 2 automated system (BioMerieux Inc, Mercy L’etoil, France) and conventional methods. Resistance to methicillin was tested by E-test (bioMérieux). Antibacterial susceptibility tests were evaluated according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria until 2014 and EUCAST between 2015 and 2021. Chi-square and Student T tests were used for statistical comparison. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients in MSS-NM, 41 patients in MRS-NM group fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. Age, gender, and CSF findings (except CSF glucose was significantly lower in MSS-NM) were similar in both groups (Table 1). Besides, EOT clinical success and overall success (EOT success followed by one-month survival without relapse or reinfection) rates were similar (Table 1). Relapse and reinfection rates during post-treatment one month period were 0%-0% and 0%-6.6% in MSS/MRS-NM, respectively. In MRS-NM group reinfection pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa after 12 and 30 days end of treatment. Characteristics of NM [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Overall success in MSS-NM was acceptable while it was non-significantly lower in MRS-NM. The medical community should seek better infection control measures from NM. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
---|