Cargando…

108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that the efficacy of dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, may be similar to current standard of care (SoC) treatment options for osteomyelitis, and may be associated with fewer treatment related adverse events. This study assessed the incidence of treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cain, Alexander, Bremmer, Derek N, Carr, Dustin R, Buchanan, Carley, Jacobs, Max, Walsh, Thomas L, Moffa, Matthew, Shively, Nathan, Trienski, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644849/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.108
_version_ 1784610181261295616
author Cain, Alexander
Bremmer, Derek N
Carr, Dustin R
Buchanan, Carley
Jacobs, Max
Walsh, Thomas L
Moffa, Matthew
Shively, Nathan
Trienski, Tamara
author_facet Cain, Alexander
Bremmer, Derek N
Carr, Dustin R
Buchanan, Carley
Jacobs, Max
Walsh, Thomas L
Moffa, Matthew
Shively, Nathan
Trienski, Tamara
author_sort Cain, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that the efficacy of dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, may be similar to current standard of care (SoC) treatment options for osteomyelitis, and may be associated with fewer treatment related adverse events. This study assessed the incidence of treatment failure in patients receiving either dalbavancin or SoC for the treatment of osteomyelitis. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. Patients were matched 1:2 to either dalbavancin (1500 mg infused intravenously on days 1 and 8) or SoC for osteomyelitis (oral or intravenous antibiotics) by Charlson Comorbidity Index, site of infection, and causative pathogen. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of treatment failure after a one-year follow-up period. Secondary objectives included hospital length of stay (LOS), infection related one-year readmission rates, and treatment related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were matched to receive dalbavancin (n = 42) or SoC (n = 90). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. The majority of patients had lower extremity osteomyelitis (76.2% vs 73.3%) with an etiology of diabetic foot infection (45.2% vs 46.7%) in the dalbavancin and SoC groups, respectively. Treatment failure was similar between those who received dalbavancin and SoC (21.4% vs 23.3%, p = 0.808). Patients who received dalbavancin had a significantly shorter hospital LOS compared to patients who received SoC regimens (5.2 days vs 7.2 days, p = 0.013). There was no difference in the rates of infection related readmissions between the dalbavancin and the SoC group (31% vs 31.1%, p = 0.985). Peripherally inserted central catheter line related complications were reported in 17.8% of patients in the SoC group, however the lower incidence of overall adverse events in the dalbavancin group was not significantly different than the SoC group (21.4% vs 36.7%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin administered as a two-dose regimen is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteomyelitis DISCLOSURES: Dustin R. Carr, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Merck (Speaker's Bureau) Thomas L. Walsh, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics (Other Financial or Material Support, speaking fees)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86448492021-12-06 108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study Cain, Alexander Bremmer, Derek N Carr, Dustin R Buchanan, Carley Jacobs, Max Walsh, Thomas L Moffa, Matthew Shively, Nathan Trienski, Tamara Open Forum Infect Dis Oral Abstracts BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that the efficacy of dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, may be similar to current standard of care (SoC) treatment options for osteomyelitis, and may be associated with fewer treatment related adverse events. This study assessed the incidence of treatment failure in patients receiving either dalbavancin or SoC for the treatment of osteomyelitis. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. Patients were matched 1:2 to either dalbavancin (1500 mg infused intravenously on days 1 and 8) or SoC for osteomyelitis (oral or intravenous antibiotics) by Charlson Comorbidity Index, site of infection, and causative pathogen. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of treatment failure after a one-year follow-up period. Secondary objectives included hospital length of stay (LOS), infection related one-year readmission rates, and treatment related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were matched to receive dalbavancin (n = 42) or SoC (n = 90). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. The majority of patients had lower extremity osteomyelitis (76.2% vs 73.3%) with an etiology of diabetic foot infection (45.2% vs 46.7%) in the dalbavancin and SoC groups, respectively. Treatment failure was similar between those who received dalbavancin and SoC (21.4% vs 23.3%, p = 0.808). Patients who received dalbavancin had a significantly shorter hospital LOS compared to patients who received SoC regimens (5.2 days vs 7.2 days, p = 0.013). There was no difference in the rates of infection related readmissions between the dalbavancin and the SoC group (31% vs 31.1%, p = 0.985). Peripherally inserted central catheter line related complications were reported in 17.8% of patients in the SoC group, however the lower incidence of overall adverse events in the dalbavancin group was not significantly different than the SoC group (21.4% vs 36.7%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin administered as a two-dose regimen is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteomyelitis DISCLOSURES: Dustin R. Carr, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Merck (Speaker's Bureau) Thomas L. Walsh, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics (Other Financial or Material Support, speaking fees) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644849/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.108 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Abstracts
Cain, Alexander
Bremmer, Derek N
Carr, Dustin R
Buchanan, Carley
Jacobs, Max
Walsh, Thomas L
Moffa, Matthew
Shively, Nathan
Trienski, Tamara
108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study
title 108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study
title_full 108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr 108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed 108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study
title_short 108. Efficacy of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study
title_sort 108. efficacy of dalbavancin compared to standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis: a retrospective study
topic Oral Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644849/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.108
work_keys_str_mv AT cainalexander 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT bremmerderekn 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT carrdustinr 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT buchanancarley 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT jacobsmax 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT walshthomasl 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT moffamatthew 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT shivelynathan 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy
AT trienskitamara 108efficacyofdalbavancincomparedtostandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisaretrospectivestudy