Cargando…

77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens

BACKGROUND: The single-tablet regimen (STR) dolutegravir/rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) was approved in 2017 for use in virologically suppressed PWH, followed by approval in 2019 of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC). There is a need to evaluate outcomes of 2DR regimens in stable switch population by measurin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sax, Paul, Eron, Joseph J, Radtchenko, Janna, Diaz-Cuervo, Helena, Moore, Mark, Santiago, Steven, Ramgopal, Moti, Mounzer, Karam, Elion, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644888/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.077
_version_ 1784610190406975488
author Sax, Paul
Eron, Joseph J
Radtchenko, Janna
Diaz-Cuervo, Helena
Moore, Mark
Santiago, Steven
Ramgopal, Moti
Mounzer, Karam
Elion, Richard
author_facet Sax, Paul
Eron, Joseph J
Radtchenko, Janna
Diaz-Cuervo, Helena
Moore, Mark
Santiago, Steven
Ramgopal, Moti
Mounzer, Karam
Elion, Richard
author_sort Sax, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The single-tablet regimen (STR) dolutegravir/rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) was approved in 2017 for use in virologically suppressed PWH, followed by approval in 2019 of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC). There is a need to evaluate outcomes of 2DR regimens in stable switch population by measuring risk of virologic failure. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of the Trio Health HIV Research Network cohort of nearly 60,000 PWH evaluated risk of virologic failure among treatment-experienced virologically suppressed PWH switching to a 2DR or 3DR STR (index = time of switch). Eligible patients (pts) were ≥ 18 yrs, treatment-experienced, suppressed at index, with post-index viral loads, ≥ 6 mo pre-index history, with dispenses for DTG/RPV, DTG/3TC or commonly used 3DR STRs initiated after Nov. 2017. Univariate comparisons were performed using Χ(2) for categorical and t-test for continuous variables; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate time to virologic failure and Cox Proportional Hazards analysis was used to evaluate risk of virologic failure accounting for age, gender, race, and baseline eGFR. Virologic failure was defined as 2 consecutive viral loads >200 cells/ml. RESULTS: Of 1668 pts, 132 (8%) received 2DR. Significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups are shown in Table 1. In unadjusted analysis the difference in proportion of pts with virologic failure did not reach significance: 7% (9 pts) on 2DR experienced virologic failure vs 4% (65 pts) on 3DR (p=0.166). Additionally, unadjusted risk of virologic failure and time to virologic failure were not statistically different [Figure 1, Table 2]. Based on prespecified adjusted analysis accounting for race, gender, age, and baseline eGFR, the risk of virologic failure was higher for 2DR compared to 3DR STRs (HR=2.2 CI 95% 1.1-4.5, p=0.032) [Table 2]. Adjusting for baseline CD4 was not feasible due to high proportion of missing CD4 at index. Table 1 Baseline (index) characteristics [Image: see text] Figure 1 Unadjusted time to virologic failure [Image: see text] Table 2 Risk of virologic failure [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: This early evaluation showed higher risk of virologic failure among virologically suppressed pts who switched to 2DR vs 3DR STRs after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. Future analysis is warranted using a larger sample of 2DR pts with additional adjustment for prior regimen failure. DISCLOSURES: Paul Sax, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)ViiV (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Janna Radtchenko, MBA, Trio Health (Employee) Helena Diaz-Cuervo, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Mark Moore, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Steven Santiago, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Speaker's Bureau) Moti Ramgopal, MD FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau) Karam Mounzer, MD, Epividian (Advisor or Review Panel member)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Speaker's Bureau) Richard Elion, MD, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Speaker's Bureau)Proteus (Grant/Research Support)Trio Health (Employee)ViiV (Advisor or Review Panel member)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86448882021-12-06 77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens Sax, Paul Eron, Joseph J Radtchenko, Janna Diaz-Cuervo, Helena Moore, Mark Santiago, Steven Ramgopal, Moti Mounzer, Karam Elion, Richard Open Forum Infect Dis Oral Abstracts BACKGROUND: The single-tablet regimen (STR) dolutegravir/rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) was approved in 2017 for use in virologically suppressed PWH, followed by approval in 2019 of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC). There is a need to evaluate outcomes of 2DR regimens in stable switch population by measuring risk of virologic failure. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of the Trio Health HIV Research Network cohort of nearly 60,000 PWH evaluated risk of virologic failure among treatment-experienced virologically suppressed PWH switching to a 2DR or 3DR STR (index = time of switch). Eligible patients (pts) were ≥ 18 yrs, treatment-experienced, suppressed at index, with post-index viral loads, ≥ 6 mo pre-index history, with dispenses for DTG/RPV, DTG/3TC or commonly used 3DR STRs initiated after Nov. 2017. Univariate comparisons were performed using Χ(2) for categorical and t-test for continuous variables; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate time to virologic failure and Cox Proportional Hazards analysis was used to evaluate risk of virologic failure accounting for age, gender, race, and baseline eGFR. Virologic failure was defined as 2 consecutive viral loads >200 cells/ml. RESULTS: Of 1668 pts, 132 (8%) received 2DR. Significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups are shown in Table 1. In unadjusted analysis the difference in proportion of pts with virologic failure did not reach significance: 7% (9 pts) on 2DR experienced virologic failure vs 4% (65 pts) on 3DR (p=0.166). Additionally, unadjusted risk of virologic failure and time to virologic failure were not statistically different [Figure 1, Table 2]. Based on prespecified adjusted analysis accounting for race, gender, age, and baseline eGFR, the risk of virologic failure was higher for 2DR compared to 3DR STRs (HR=2.2 CI 95% 1.1-4.5, p=0.032) [Table 2]. Adjusting for baseline CD4 was not feasible due to high proportion of missing CD4 at index. Table 1 Baseline (index) characteristics [Image: see text] Figure 1 Unadjusted time to virologic failure [Image: see text] Table 2 Risk of virologic failure [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: This early evaluation showed higher risk of virologic failure among virologically suppressed pts who switched to 2DR vs 3DR STRs after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. Future analysis is warranted using a larger sample of 2DR pts with additional adjustment for prior regimen failure. DISCLOSURES: Paul Sax, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)ViiV (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Janna Radtchenko, MBA, Trio Health (Employee) Helena Diaz-Cuervo, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Mark Moore, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Steven Santiago, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Speaker's Bureau) Moti Ramgopal, MD FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau) Karam Mounzer, MD, Epividian (Advisor or Review Panel member)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Speaker's Bureau) Richard Elion, MD, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Speaker's Bureau)Proteus (Grant/Research Support)Trio Health (Employee)ViiV (Advisor or Review Panel member) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644888/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.077 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oral Abstracts
Sax, Paul
Eron, Joseph J
Radtchenko, Janna
Diaz-Cuervo, Helena
Moore, Mark
Santiago, Steven
Ramgopal, Moti
Mounzer, Karam
Elion, Richard
77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens
title 77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens
title_full 77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens
title_fullStr 77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens
title_full_unstemmed 77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens
title_short 77. Risk of Virologic Failure Among Treatment-experienced Suppressed People with HIV (PWH) Treated with Single-Tablet 2-Drug (2DR) vs 3-Drug (3DR) Regimens
title_sort 77. risk of virologic failure among treatment-experienced suppressed people with hiv (pwh) treated with single-tablet 2-drug (2dr) vs 3-drug (3dr) regimens
topic Oral Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644888/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.077
work_keys_str_mv AT saxpaul 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT eronjosephj 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT radtchenkojanna 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT diazcuervohelena 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT mooremark 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT santiagosteven 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT ramgopalmoti 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT mounzerkaram 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens
AT elionrichard 77riskofvirologicfailureamongtreatmentexperiencedsuppressedpeoplewithhivpwhtreatedwithsingletablet2drug2drvs3drug3drregimens