Cargando…
117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644991/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.319 |
_version_ | 1784610214920585216 |
---|---|
author | Hammond, Keely Chen, Justin Doucette, Karen Smith, Stephanie Kabbani, Dima Lau, Cecilia Bains, Serena Stewart, Jackson J Fong, Karen G |
author_facet | Hammond, Keely Chen, Justin Doucette, Karen Smith, Stephanie Kabbani, Dima Lau, Cecilia Bains, Serena Stewart, Jackson J Fong, Karen G |
author_sort | Hammond, Keely |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline) in adult inpatients at our large Canadian academic centre has been performed since 2018. Actionable feedback is communicated via chart note plus one of a phone call, direct message, or in-person discussion with the most responsible physician of the attending team in order to optimize the prescription if deemed necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of AMS provider role on PAF acceptance. METHODS: A 3 year retrospective review of all PAF events was undertaken. All audited prescriptions were included. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios for acceptance for individual AMS provider roles of pharmacist, physician, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee. RESULTS: Out of 1896 prescriptions audited, actionable feedback was provided to the most responsible physician in 731 (39%) cases. 677/731 (93%) of audited antibiotics were carbapenems. The overall acceptance rate was 82% (598/731). Acceptance rate and odds of acceptance based on AMS provider role were as follows: pharmacist alone 171/208 (82%), OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.59, physician alone 141/160 (88%), OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.20, pharmacist-physician duo 211/268 (79%), OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee 75/95 (79%), OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.41. CONCLUSION: The overall acceptance rate was high. There was a higher odds of acceptance if an AMS physician was providing PAF alone, highlighting the importance of physician involvement. DISCLOSURES: Dima Kabbani, MD, AVIR Pharma (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Edesa Biotech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8644991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86449912021-12-06 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? Hammond, Keely Chen, Justin Doucette, Karen Smith, Stephanie Kabbani, Dima Lau, Cecilia Bains, Serena Stewart, Jackson J Fong, Karen G Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline) in adult inpatients at our large Canadian academic centre has been performed since 2018. Actionable feedback is communicated via chart note plus one of a phone call, direct message, or in-person discussion with the most responsible physician of the attending team in order to optimize the prescription if deemed necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of AMS provider role on PAF acceptance. METHODS: A 3 year retrospective review of all PAF events was undertaken. All audited prescriptions were included. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios for acceptance for individual AMS provider roles of pharmacist, physician, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee. RESULTS: Out of 1896 prescriptions audited, actionable feedback was provided to the most responsible physician in 731 (39%) cases. 677/731 (93%) of audited antibiotics were carbapenems. The overall acceptance rate was 82% (598/731). Acceptance rate and odds of acceptance based on AMS provider role were as follows: pharmacist alone 171/208 (82%), OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.59, physician alone 141/160 (88%), OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.20, pharmacist-physician duo 211/268 (79%), OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee 75/95 (79%), OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.41. CONCLUSION: The overall acceptance rate was high. There was a higher odds of acceptance if an AMS physician was providing PAF alone, highlighting the importance of physician involvement. DISCLOSURES: Dima Kabbani, MD, AVIR Pharma (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Edesa Biotech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644991/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.319 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Hammond, Keely Chen, Justin Doucette, Karen Smith, Stephanie Kabbani, Dima Lau, Cecilia Bains, Serena Stewart, Jackson J Fong, Karen G 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? |
title | 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? |
title_full | 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? |
title_fullStr | 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? |
title_full_unstemmed | 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? |
title_short | 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? |
title_sort | 117. how does antimicrobial stewardship provider role affect prospective audit and feedback acceptance by the attending physician? |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644991/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammondkeely 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT chenjustin 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT doucettekaren 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT smithstephanie 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT kabbanidima 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT laucecilia 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT bainsserena 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT stewartjacksonj 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician AT fongkareng 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician |