Cargando…

117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammond, Keely, Chen, Justin, Doucette, Karen, Smith, Stephanie, Kabbani, Dima, Lau, Cecilia, Bains, Serena, Stewart, Jackson J, Fong, Karen G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644991/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.319
_version_ 1784610214920585216
author Hammond, Keely
Chen, Justin
Doucette, Karen
Smith, Stephanie
Kabbani, Dima
Lau, Cecilia
Bains, Serena
Stewart, Jackson J
Fong, Karen G
author_facet Hammond, Keely
Chen, Justin
Doucette, Karen
Smith, Stephanie
Kabbani, Dima
Lau, Cecilia
Bains, Serena
Stewart, Jackson J
Fong, Karen G
author_sort Hammond, Keely
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline) in adult inpatients at our large Canadian academic centre has been performed since 2018. Actionable feedback is communicated via chart note plus one of a phone call, direct message, or in-person discussion with the most responsible physician of the attending team in order to optimize the prescription if deemed necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of AMS provider role on PAF acceptance. METHODS: A 3 year retrospective review of all PAF events was undertaken. All audited prescriptions were included. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios for acceptance for individual AMS provider roles of pharmacist, physician, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee. RESULTS: Out of 1896 prescriptions audited, actionable feedback was provided to the most responsible physician in 731 (39%) cases. 677/731 (93%) of audited antibiotics were carbapenems. The overall acceptance rate was 82% (598/731). Acceptance rate and odds of acceptance based on AMS provider role were as follows: pharmacist alone 171/208 (82%), OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.59, physician alone 141/160 (88%), OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.20, pharmacist-physician duo 211/268 (79%), OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee 75/95 (79%), OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.41. CONCLUSION: The overall acceptance rate was high. There was a higher odds of acceptance if an AMS physician was providing PAF alone, highlighting the importance of physician involvement. DISCLOSURES: Dima Kabbani, MD, AVIR Pharma (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Edesa Biotech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8644991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86449912021-12-06 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician? Hammond, Keely Chen, Justin Doucette, Karen Smith, Stephanie Kabbani, Dima Lau, Cecilia Bains, Serena Stewart, Jackson J Fong, Karen G Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline) in adult inpatients at our large Canadian academic centre has been performed since 2018. Actionable feedback is communicated via chart note plus one of a phone call, direct message, or in-person discussion with the most responsible physician of the attending team in order to optimize the prescription if deemed necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of AMS provider role on PAF acceptance. METHODS: A 3 year retrospective review of all PAF events was undertaken. All audited prescriptions were included. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios for acceptance for individual AMS provider roles of pharmacist, physician, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee. RESULTS: Out of 1896 prescriptions audited, actionable feedback was provided to the most responsible physician in 731 (39%) cases. 677/731 (93%) of audited antibiotics were carbapenems. The overall acceptance rate was 82% (598/731). Acceptance rate and odds of acceptance based on AMS provider role were as follows: pharmacist alone 171/208 (82%), OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.59, physician alone 141/160 (88%), OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.20, pharmacist-physician duo 211/268 (79%), OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee 75/95 (79%), OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.41. CONCLUSION: The overall acceptance rate was high. There was a higher odds of acceptance if an AMS physician was providing PAF alone, highlighting the importance of physician involvement. DISCLOSURES: Dima Kabbani, MD, AVIR Pharma (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Edesa Biotech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8644991/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.319 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Hammond, Keely
Chen, Justin
Doucette, Karen
Smith, Stephanie
Kabbani, Dima
Lau, Cecilia
Bains, Serena
Stewart, Jackson J
Fong, Karen G
117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
title 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
title_full 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
title_fullStr 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
title_full_unstemmed 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
title_short 117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?
title_sort 117. how does antimicrobial stewardship provider role affect prospective audit and feedback acceptance by the attending physician?
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8644991/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.319
work_keys_str_mv AT hammondkeely 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT chenjustin 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT doucettekaren 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT smithstephanie 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT kabbanidima 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT laucecilia 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT bainsserena 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT stewartjacksonj 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician
AT fongkareng 117howdoesantimicrobialstewardshipproviderroleaffectprospectiveauditandfeedbackacceptancebytheattendingphysician