Cargando…

104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in hospitals improve antibiotic prescribing, slow antimicrobial resistance, reduce hospitalisation duration, mortality and readmission rates, and save costs. However, the strategy of prospective audit and feedback is laborious. In Singapore Genera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Si Lin Sarah, Lee, Winnie, Chong, Yiling, Saigal, Akshay, Zhou, Peijun Yvonne, Hung, Kai Chee, Tan, Lun Yi, Chung, Shimin Jasmine, Kwa, Lay Hoon Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645052/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.306
_version_ 1784610229146615808
author Tang, Si Lin Sarah
Lee, Winnie
Chong, Yiling
Saigal, Akshay
Zhou, Peijun Yvonne
Hung, Kai Chee
Tan, Lun Yi
Chung, Shimin Jasmine
Kwa, Lay Hoon Andrea
author_facet Tang, Si Lin Sarah
Lee, Winnie
Chong, Yiling
Saigal, Akshay
Zhou, Peijun Yvonne
Hung, Kai Chee
Tan, Lun Yi
Chung, Shimin Jasmine
Kwa, Lay Hoon Andrea
author_sort Tang, Si Lin Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in hospitals improve antibiotic prescribing, slow antimicrobial resistance, reduce hospitalisation duration, mortality and readmission rates, and save costs. However, the strategy of prospective audit and feedback is laborious. In Singapore General Hospital (SGH), 10 reviews are required to identify 2 inappropriate cases. Limited manpower constraints ASP audits to only about 30% of antibiotics prescribed. This proof-of-concept study explored the feasibility of developing a predictive model to prioritise inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for ASP review. METHODS: ASP-audited adult pneumonia patients from January 2016 to December 2018 in SGH were included. Patient data e.g., demographics, allergies, past medical history, and relevant laboratory investigations at each antibiotic use episode were extracted from electronic medical records and re-assembled through linking for analysis. Ground truth for model training was based on ASP-defined appropriateness for each encounter. The dataset was split into 80% and 20% for training and testing respectively. Three modelling techniques, XGBoost, decision tree and logistic regression, were assessed for their relative performance in terms of precision, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: There were 12471 unique patient encounters. Training was done on 10459 encounters and 39 data elements were included. When tested on 2012 encounters, the logistic regression model performed the best (86.7% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity). The model correctly classified 1377 out of 1388 (99.2%) encounters as “appropriate” (do not require ASP intervention). 624 antibiotic use encounters were classified as “inappropriate”, of which only 72 were truly inappropriate (positive predictive value for ASP intervention, PPV 11.5%). The low PPV was likely due to inadequate representation of “inappropriate” cases in the training dataset (4.1%). Applying this model would prioritise the number of immediate ASP reviews needed to identify cases for intervention by two-thirds, from 2012 to 624 (Figure 1). Figure 1. Illustration of AI benefits in ASP [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: ASPs can leverage on machine learning capabilities to improve audit efficiency. This can increase ASP’s productivity and staff’s job satisfaction as they are freed up to perform other work. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8645052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86450522021-12-06 104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling Tang, Si Lin Sarah Lee, Winnie Chong, Yiling Saigal, Akshay Zhou, Peijun Yvonne Hung, Kai Chee Tan, Lun Yi Chung, Shimin Jasmine Kwa, Lay Hoon Andrea Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in hospitals improve antibiotic prescribing, slow antimicrobial resistance, reduce hospitalisation duration, mortality and readmission rates, and save costs. However, the strategy of prospective audit and feedback is laborious. In Singapore General Hospital (SGH), 10 reviews are required to identify 2 inappropriate cases. Limited manpower constraints ASP audits to only about 30% of antibiotics prescribed. This proof-of-concept study explored the feasibility of developing a predictive model to prioritise inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for ASP review. METHODS: ASP-audited adult pneumonia patients from January 2016 to December 2018 in SGH were included. Patient data e.g., demographics, allergies, past medical history, and relevant laboratory investigations at each antibiotic use episode were extracted from electronic medical records and re-assembled through linking for analysis. Ground truth for model training was based on ASP-defined appropriateness for each encounter. The dataset was split into 80% and 20% for training and testing respectively. Three modelling techniques, XGBoost, decision tree and logistic regression, were assessed for their relative performance in terms of precision, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: There were 12471 unique patient encounters. Training was done on 10459 encounters and 39 data elements were included. When tested on 2012 encounters, the logistic regression model performed the best (86.7% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity). The model correctly classified 1377 out of 1388 (99.2%) encounters as “appropriate” (do not require ASP intervention). 624 antibiotic use encounters were classified as “inappropriate”, of which only 72 were truly inappropriate (positive predictive value for ASP intervention, PPV 11.5%). The low PPV was likely due to inadequate representation of “inappropriate” cases in the training dataset (4.1%). Applying this model would prioritise the number of immediate ASP reviews needed to identify cases for intervention by two-thirds, from 2012 to 624 (Figure 1). Figure 1. Illustration of AI benefits in ASP [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: ASPs can leverage on machine learning capabilities to improve audit efficiency. This can increase ASP’s productivity and staff’s job satisfaction as they are freed up to perform other work. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8645052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.306 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Tang, Si Lin Sarah
Lee, Winnie
Chong, Yiling
Saigal, Akshay
Zhou, Peijun Yvonne
Hung, Kai Chee
Tan, Lun Yi
Chung, Shimin Jasmine
Kwa, Lay Hoon Andrea
104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling
title 104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling
title_full 104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling
title_fullStr 104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling
title_full_unstemmed 104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling
title_short 104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling
title_sort 104. improving efficiency of antimicrobial stewardship reviews using artificial intelligence modelling
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645052/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.306
work_keys_str_mv AT tangsilinsarah 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT leewinnie 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT chongyiling 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT saigalakshay 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT zhoupeijunyvonne 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT hungkaichee 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT tanlunyi 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT chungshiminjasmine 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling
AT kwalayhoonandrea 104improvingefficiencyofantimicrobialstewardshipreviewsusingartificialintelligencemodelling