Cargando…
190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
BACKGROUND: Monotherapy with vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) remains the guideline-driven standard of care for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) despite concerns regarding efficacy. While combination therapy is often utilized as salvage treatment for persistent MRS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645057/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.392 |
_version_ | 1784610230331506688 |
---|---|
author | Dolan, Mackenzie Shah, Megan Platts-Mills, James A Elliott, Zachary Madden, Gregory Eby, Joshua |
author_facet | Dolan, Mackenzie Shah, Megan Platts-Mills, James A Elliott, Zachary Madden, Gregory Eby, Joshua |
author_sort | Dolan, Mackenzie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Monotherapy with vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) remains the guideline-driven standard of care for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) despite concerns regarding efficacy. While combination therapy is often utilized as salvage treatment for persistent MRSA-B, growing data suggest a potential benefit of combination therapy with ceftaroline as initial therapy for MRSA-B. In light of these data, we updated practice guidance at our institution for management of MRSA-B in March 2020 to favor initial combination therapy with ceftaroline. Herein, we present an assessment of outcomes of patients with MRSA-B initiated on early combination therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of adult patients admitted to the University of Virginia with MRSA-B between July 1, 2018 and February 28, 2021. Patients were considered to have received combination therapy if they received VAN or DAP plus ceftaroline (CPT) within 5 days of index blood culture, and monotherapy if during that period they received VAN and/or DAP alone. The primary outcome was a composite of persistent bacteremia, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 30-day bacteremia recurrence. Time to microbiological cure and safety outcomes were also assessed. A propensity score-weighted logistic regression was conducted. A post-hoc analysis of the primary composite outcome was performed in which patients were only deemed to have received combination therapy if it was started within 72 hours. RESULTS: Of 94 patients included, 57 received monotherapy (55 VAN, 2 DAP) and 37 received combination therapy with CPT (30 VAN, 7 DAP). There was no difference between groups for the primary composite outcome in the primary analysis (OR 2.7, 95% CI 0.95-7.72) or the post-hoc analysis (OR 2.37, 95% CI 0.68-8.22). Time to microbiological cure was not different between groups (mean difference 1.47, 95% CI 0.20-2.74). Safety outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, there was no clear benefit or harm of early initiation of combination therapy for MRSA-B. Additional study of initial combination therapy with ceftaroline is warranted given the small number of subjects in the study presented. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8645057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86450572021-12-06 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Dolan, Mackenzie Shah, Megan Platts-Mills, James A Elliott, Zachary Madden, Gregory Eby, Joshua Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Monotherapy with vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) remains the guideline-driven standard of care for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) despite concerns regarding efficacy. While combination therapy is often utilized as salvage treatment for persistent MRSA-B, growing data suggest a potential benefit of combination therapy with ceftaroline as initial therapy for MRSA-B. In light of these data, we updated practice guidance at our institution for management of MRSA-B in March 2020 to favor initial combination therapy with ceftaroline. Herein, we present an assessment of outcomes of patients with MRSA-B initiated on early combination therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of adult patients admitted to the University of Virginia with MRSA-B between July 1, 2018 and February 28, 2021. Patients were considered to have received combination therapy if they received VAN or DAP plus ceftaroline (CPT) within 5 days of index blood culture, and monotherapy if during that period they received VAN and/or DAP alone. The primary outcome was a composite of persistent bacteremia, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 30-day bacteremia recurrence. Time to microbiological cure and safety outcomes were also assessed. A propensity score-weighted logistic regression was conducted. A post-hoc analysis of the primary composite outcome was performed in which patients were only deemed to have received combination therapy if it was started within 72 hours. RESULTS: Of 94 patients included, 57 received monotherapy (55 VAN, 2 DAP) and 37 received combination therapy with CPT (30 VAN, 7 DAP). There was no difference between groups for the primary composite outcome in the primary analysis (OR 2.7, 95% CI 0.95-7.72) or the post-hoc analysis (OR 2.37, 95% CI 0.68-8.22). Time to microbiological cure was not different between groups (mean difference 1.47, 95% CI 0.20-2.74). Safety outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, there was no clear benefit or harm of early initiation of combination therapy for MRSA-B. Additional study of initial combination therapy with ceftaroline is warranted given the small number of subjects in the study presented. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8645057/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.392 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Dolan, Mackenzie Shah, Megan Platts-Mills, James A Elliott, Zachary Madden, Gregory Eby, Joshua 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia |
title | 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia |
title_full | 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia |
title_fullStr | 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia |
title_full_unstemmed | 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia |
title_short | 190. Outcomes of Early Ceftaroline-based Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia |
title_sort | 190. outcomes of early ceftaroline-based combination therapy for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteremia |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645057/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dolanmackenzie 190outcomesofearlyceftarolinebasedcombinationtherapyformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia AT shahmegan 190outcomesofearlyceftarolinebasedcombinationtherapyformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia AT plattsmillsjamesa 190outcomesofearlyceftarolinebasedcombinationtherapyformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia AT elliottzachary 190outcomesofearlyceftarolinebasedcombinationtherapyformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia AT maddengregory 190outcomesofearlyceftarolinebasedcombinationtherapyformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia AT ebyjoshua 190outcomesofearlyceftarolinebasedcombinationtherapyformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia |