Cargando…
Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics
BACKGROUND: The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate all-distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and functional visual acuity (FVA) of eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using an echelett optics and monofocal IOLs with the same platf...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7 |
_version_ | 1784610245002133504 |
---|---|
author | Sakisaka, Toshihiro Minami, Keiichiro Takada, Keita Mori, Yosai Miyata, Kazunori |
author_facet | Sakisaka, Toshihiro Minami, Keiichiro Takada, Keita Mori, Yosai Miyata, Kazunori |
author_sort | Sakisaka, Toshihiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate all-distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and functional visual acuity (FVA) of eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using an echelett optics and monofocal IOLs with the same platform. METHODS: Diffractive EDOF and monofocal IOLs were implanted in 27 eyes of 27 patients each. At 3 months after implantation, all-distance visual acuities at distances of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, and 5 m were measured under distance-corrected. Static visual function was also examined using photopic contrast sensitivity and area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). Dynamic visual function was examined with FVA, and mean FVA value, visual maintenance ratio (VMR), mean response time, and number of blinks were evaluated. These outcomes were compared between the two IOLs. RESULTS: The mean distance-corrected visual acuities were better at distances of 0.7 m or nearer in eyes with EDOF IOLs. There was no difference in the contrast sensitivities (P > 0.22). In the FVA results, no difference was found in mean FVA and VMR (P > 0.68). CONCLUSION: The static and dynamic evaluations of postoperative visual functions demonstrated that the visual function of eyes with EDOF IOLs under photopic and distance-corrected conditions was comparable to eyes with monofocal IOLs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8645128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86451282021-12-06 Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics Sakisaka, Toshihiro Minami, Keiichiro Takada, Keita Mori, Yosai Miyata, Kazunori BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate all-distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and functional visual acuity (FVA) of eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using an echelett optics and monofocal IOLs with the same platform. METHODS: Diffractive EDOF and monofocal IOLs were implanted in 27 eyes of 27 patients each. At 3 months after implantation, all-distance visual acuities at distances of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, and 5 m were measured under distance-corrected. Static visual function was also examined using photopic contrast sensitivity and area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). Dynamic visual function was examined with FVA, and mean FVA value, visual maintenance ratio (VMR), mean response time, and number of blinks were evaluated. These outcomes were compared between the two IOLs. RESULTS: The mean distance-corrected visual acuities were better at distances of 0.7 m or nearer in eyes with EDOF IOLs. There was no difference in the contrast sensitivities (P > 0.22). In the FVA results, no difference was found in mean FVA and VMR (P > 0.68). CONCLUSION: The static and dynamic evaluations of postoperative visual functions demonstrated that the visual function of eyes with EDOF IOLs under photopic and distance-corrected conditions was comparable to eyes with monofocal IOLs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7. BioMed Central 2021-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8645128/ /pubmed/34863126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sakisaka, Toshihiro Minami, Keiichiro Takada, Keita Mori, Yosai Miyata, Kazunori Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
title | Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
title_full | Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
title_fullStr | Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
title_short | Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
title_sort | functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34863126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakisakatoshihiro functionalvisualacuityafterimplantationofdiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensesusinganechelettoptics AT minamikeiichiro functionalvisualacuityafterimplantationofdiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensesusinganechelettoptics AT takadakeita functionalvisualacuityafterimplantationofdiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensesusinganechelettoptics AT moriyosai functionalvisualacuityafterimplantationofdiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensesusinganechelettoptics AT miyatakazunori functionalvisualacuityafterimplantationofdiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensesusinganechelettoptics |