Cargando…

Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images

The visual system represents textural image regions as simple statistics that are useful for the rapid perception of scenes and surfaces. What images ‘textures’ are, however, has so far mostly been subjectively defined. The present study investigated the empirical conditions under which natural imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurosawa, Fumiya, Orima, Taiki, Okada, Kosuke, Motoyoshi, Isamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695211054540
_version_ 1784610279647084544
author Kurosawa, Fumiya
Orima, Taiki
Okada, Kosuke
Motoyoshi, Isamu
author_facet Kurosawa, Fumiya
Orima, Taiki
Okada, Kosuke
Motoyoshi, Isamu
author_sort Kurosawa, Fumiya
collection PubMed
description The visual system represents textural image regions as simple statistics that are useful for the rapid perception of scenes and surfaces. What images ‘textures’ are, however, has so far mostly been subjectively defined. The present study investigated the empirical conditions under which natural images are processed as texture. We first show that ‘texturality’ – i.e., whether or not an image is perceived as a texture – is strongly correlated with the perceived similarity between an original image and its Portilla-Simoncelli (PS) synthesized image. We found that both judgments are highly correlated with specific PS statistics of the image. We also demonstrate that a discriminant model based on a small set of image statistics could discriminate whether a given image was perceived as a texture with over 90% accuracy. The results provide a method to determine whether a given image region is represented statistically by the human visual system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8645308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86453082021-12-06 Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images Kurosawa, Fumiya Orima, Taiki Okada, Kosuke Motoyoshi, Isamu Iperception Short Report The visual system represents textural image regions as simple statistics that are useful for the rapid perception of scenes and surfaces. What images ‘textures’ are, however, has so far mostly been subjectively defined. The present study investigated the empirical conditions under which natural images are processed as texture. We first show that ‘texturality’ – i.e., whether or not an image is perceived as a texture – is strongly correlated with the perceived similarity between an original image and its Portilla-Simoncelli (PS) synthesized image. We found that both judgments are highly correlated with specific PS statistics of the image. We also demonstrate that a discriminant model based on a small set of image statistics could discriminate whether a given image was perceived as a texture with over 90% accuracy. The results provide a method to determine whether a given image region is represented statistically by the human visual system. SAGE Publications 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8645308/ /pubmed/34876972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695211054540 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Short Report
Kurosawa, Fumiya
Orima, Taiki
Okada, Kosuke
Motoyoshi, Isamu
Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images
title Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images
title_full Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images
title_fullStr Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images
title_full_unstemmed Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images
title_short Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived ‘Texturality’ in Natural Images
title_sort textures vs non-textures: a simple computational method for classifying perceived ‘texturality’ in natural images
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695211054540
work_keys_str_mv AT kurosawafumiya texturesvsnontexturesasimplecomputationalmethodforclassifyingperceivedtexturalityinnaturalimages
AT orimataiki texturesvsnontexturesasimplecomputationalmethodforclassifyingperceivedtexturalityinnaturalimages
AT okadakosuke texturesvsnontexturesasimplecomputationalmethodforclassifyingperceivedtexturalityinnaturalimages
AT motoyoshiisamu texturesvsnontexturesasimplecomputationalmethodforclassifyingperceivedtexturalityinnaturalimages