Cargando…

Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Our team had firstly applied the transvesical approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients afflicted with localized prostate cancer (PCa). The present study aims to present the postoperative recovery of urinary continence (UC) following the anterior, transvesical,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Wen, Chen, Ru, Jiang, Xian, Zheng, Ping, Zhu, Ke, Zhou, Xiaochen, Liu, Xiaoqiang, Guo, Ju, Chen, Luyao, Wang, Gongxian, Fu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9523442
_version_ 1784610286653669376
author Deng, Wen
Chen, Ru
Jiang, Xian
Zheng, Ping
Zhu, Ke
Zhou, Xiaochen
Liu, Xiaoqiang
Guo, Ju
Chen, Luyao
Wang, Gongxian
Fu, Bin
author_facet Deng, Wen
Chen, Ru
Jiang, Xian
Zheng, Ping
Zhu, Ke
Zhou, Xiaochen
Liu, Xiaoqiang
Guo, Ju
Chen, Luyao
Wang, Gongxian
Fu, Bin
author_sort Deng, Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our team had firstly applied the transvesical approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients afflicted with localized prostate cancer (PCa). The present study aims to present the postoperative recovery of urinary continence (UC) following the anterior, transvesical, and posterior approaches to RARP for localized PCa and evaluate the independent predictors to early UC recovery after RARP. METHODS: Patients harboring localized PCa and receiving anterior, transvesical, and posterior approaches to RARP between January 2017 and June 2020 were enrolled in this analysis. Results on UC recovery were compared between these three approaches with the Kaplan–Meier method. All clinical and pathological variables were further analyzed via univariable and multivariable regression analysis to determine the independent factors contributing to short-term UC recovery after RARP. RESULTS: A total of 135, 73, and 66 instances were included in the anterior, transvesical, and posterior groups, respectively. Over the postoperative follow-up period, both the transvesical and posterior approaches showed an advantage over the anterior approach in promoting postoperative UC recovery (both p values <0.001). Three months after surgery, 55 (40.7%), 4 (5.5%), and 5 (7.6%) patients failed to UC in the anterior, transvesical, and posterior groups, respectively. Patient age, preoperative PSA, prostate volume, biopsy Gleason score, surgical approach, extended lymph node dissection technique, nerve-sparing technique, and positive lymph node were related to UC status based on univariable analyses (p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis results point patient age, prostate volume, surgical approach, and nerve-sparing technique as independent factors that affect postoperative UC recovery after RARP. CONCLUSIONS: The application of transvesical approach to RARP for localized PCa could obtain promising outcomes in terms of postoperative UC recovery. In addition, surgical strategies encompassing the nerve-sparing technique and the Retzius-sparing procedures, namely, the transvesical or posterior approach, during RARP could independently enable early achievement of postoperative continence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8645355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86453552021-12-06 Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Deng, Wen Chen, Ru Jiang, Xian Zheng, Ping Zhu, Ke Zhou, Xiaochen Liu, Xiaoqiang Guo, Ju Chen, Luyao Wang, Gongxian Fu, Bin J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Our team had firstly applied the transvesical approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients afflicted with localized prostate cancer (PCa). The present study aims to present the postoperative recovery of urinary continence (UC) following the anterior, transvesical, and posterior approaches to RARP for localized PCa and evaluate the independent predictors to early UC recovery after RARP. METHODS: Patients harboring localized PCa and receiving anterior, transvesical, and posterior approaches to RARP between January 2017 and June 2020 were enrolled in this analysis. Results on UC recovery were compared between these three approaches with the Kaplan–Meier method. All clinical and pathological variables were further analyzed via univariable and multivariable regression analysis to determine the independent factors contributing to short-term UC recovery after RARP. RESULTS: A total of 135, 73, and 66 instances were included in the anterior, transvesical, and posterior groups, respectively. Over the postoperative follow-up period, both the transvesical and posterior approaches showed an advantage over the anterior approach in promoting postoperative UC recovery (both p values <0.001). Three months after surgery, 55 (40.7%), 4 (5.5%), and 5 (7.6%) patients failed to UC in the anterior, transvesical, and posterior groups, respectively. Patient age, preoperative PSA, prostate volume, biopsy Gleason score, surgical approach, extended lymph node dissection technique, nerve-sparing technique, and positive lymph node were related to UC status based on univariable analyses (p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis results point patient age, prostate volume, surgical approach, and nerve-sparing technique as independent factors that affect postoperative UC recovery after RARP. CONCLUSIONS: The application of transvesical approach to RARP for localized PCa could obtain promising outcomes in terms of postoperative UC recovery. In addition, surgical strategies encompassing the nerve-sparing technique and the Retzius-sparing procedures, namely, the transvesical or posterior approach, during RARP could independently enable early achievement of postoperative continence. Hindawi 2021-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8645355/ /pubmed/34876905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9523442 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wen Deng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deng, Wen
Chen, Ru
Jiang, Xian
Zheng, Ping
Zhu, Ke
Zhou, Xiaochen
Liu, Xiaoqiang
Guo, Ju
Chen, Luyao
Wang, Gongxian
Fu, Bin
Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_full Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_fullStr Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_short Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
title_sort independent factors affecting postoperative short-term urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9523442
work_keys_str_mv AT dengwen independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT chenru independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT jiangxian independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT zhengping independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT zhuke independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT zhouxiaochen independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT liuxiaoqiang independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT guoju independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT chenluyao independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT wanggongxian independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT fubin independentfactorsaffectingpostoperativeshorttermurinarycontinencerecoveryafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy