Cargando…

Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Resilience may be defined as the ability to recover and adapt to adverse situations. Given that resilience involves cognitive and behavioral aspects, it could be promoted based on strategies that favor them, especially during childhood and adolescence. As a result, several resilience-focused program...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinto, Tatiana Matheus, Laurence, Paulo Guirro, Macedo, Cristiane Rufino, Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880812
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754115
_version_ 1784610358395142144
author Pinto, Tatiana Matheus
Laurence, Paulo Guirro
Macedo, Cristiane Rufino
Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho
author_facet Pinto, Tatiana Matheus
Laurence, Paulo Guirro
Macedo, Cristiane Rufino
Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho
author_sort Pinto, Tatiana Matheus
collection PubMed
description Resilience may be defined as the ability to recover and adapt to adverse situations. Given that resilience involves cognitive and behavioral aspects, it could be promoted based on strategies that favor them, especially during childhood and adolescence. As a result, several resilience-focused programs have been developed and studied. This systematic review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) aimed to assess resilience-focused programs for children (<12 years old) and adolescents (12–22 years old) compared to active (treatment as usual, other program modalities, and educational curriculum at school) or inactive (waiting list, no treatment) control groups. We performed a systematic review of meta-analyses of RCTs. The following databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the studies’ risk of bias. Meta-analyses of random effects were conducted to calculate the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of program effectiveness. Of the 17 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, 13 provided sufficient data to assess the effectiveness of the programs after their implementation. Meta-analyses indicated overall effectiveness of the programs in promoting resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.15, 0.81], p = 0.0077). The subgroup analysis indicated effectiveness only among adolescents’ resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.08, 0.88], p = 0.02). The follow-up analysis also indicated evidence of continuation of results within a period of up to 6 months up (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI [−0.44, 0.69], p = 0.02). These results indicated the effectiveness of promoting resilience, especially in adolescents, and its continuation in follow-up analyses. These findings are promising in the field of resilience programs; however, further studies are necessary to analyze the different possible characteristics of programs and their results. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020179874], [CRD42020179874].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8645691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86456912021-12-07 Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Pinto, Tatiana Matheus Laurence, Paulo Guirro Macedo, Cristiane Rufino Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho Front Psychol Psychology Resilience may be defined as the ability to recover and adapt to adverse situations. Given that resilience involves cognitive and behavioral aspects, it could be promoted based on strategies that favor them, especially during childhood and adolescence. As a result, several resilience-focused programs have been developed and studied. This systematic review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) aimed to assess resilience-focused programs for children (<12 years old) and adolescents (12–22 years old) compared to active (treatment as usual, other program modalities, and educational curriculum at school) or inactive (waiting list, no treatment) control groups. We performed a systematic review of meta-analyses of RCTs. The following databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the studies’ risk of bias. Meta-analyses of random effects were conducted to calculate the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of program effectiveness. Of the 17 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, 13 provided sufficient data to assess the effectiveness of the programs after their implementation. Meta-analyses indicated overall effectiveness of the programs in promoting resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.15, 0.81], p = 0.0077). The subgroup analysis indicated effectiveness only among adolescents’ resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.08, 0.88], p = 0.02). The follow-up analysis also indicated evidence of continuation of results within a period of up to 6 months up (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI [−0.44, 0.69], p = 0.02). These results indicated the effectiveness of promoting resilience, especially in adolescents, and its continuation in follow-up analyses. These findings are promising in the field of resilience programs; however, further studies are necessary to analyze the different possible characteristics of programs and their results. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020179874], [CRD42020179874]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8645691/ /pubmed/34880812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754115 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pinto, Laurence, Macedo and Macedo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pinto, Tatiana Matheus
Laurence, Paulo Guirro
Macedo, Cristiane Rufino
Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho
Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort resilience programs for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880812
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754115
work_keys_str_mv AT pintotatianamatheus resilienceprogramsforchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laurencepauloguirro resilienceprogramsforchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT macedocristianerufino resilienceprogramsforchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT macedoelizeucoutinho resilienceprogramsforchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis