Cargando…
Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Concerted effort to control malaria has had a substantial impact on the transmission of the disease in the past two decades. In areas where reduced malaria transmission is being sustained through insecticide-based vector control interventions, primarily long-lasting insecticidal nets (LL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7 |
_version_ | 1784610434070872064 |
---|---|
author | Sangoro, Onyango P. Fillinger, Ulrike Saili, Kochelani Nkya, Theresia Estomih Marubu, Rose Masaninga, Freddie Trigo, Sonia Casimiro Tarumbwa, Casper Hamainza, Busiku Baltazar, Candrinho Mberikunashe, Joseph Chisanga, Brian Menale, Kassie Chanda, Emmanuel Mutero, Clifford Maina |
author_facet | Sangoro, Onyango P. Fillinger, Ulrike Saili, Kochelani Nkya, Theresia Estomih Marubu, Rose Masaninga, Freddie Trigo, Sonia Casimiro Tarumbwa, Casper Hamainza, Busiku Baltazar, Candrinho Mberikunashe, Joseph Chisanga, Brian Menale, Kassie Chanda, Emmanuel Mutero, Clifford Maina |
author_sort | Sangoro, Onyango P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concerted effort to control malaria has had a substantial impact on the transmission of the disease in the past two decades. In areas where reduced malaria transmission is being sustained through insecticide-based vector control interventions, primarily long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), non-insecticidal complementary tools will likely be needed to push towards malaria elimination. Once interruption in local disease transmission is achieved, insecticide-based measures can be scaled down gradually and eventually phased out, saving on costs of sustaining control programs and mitigating any unintended negative health and environmental impacts posed by insecticides. These non-insecticidal methods could eventually replace insecticidal methods of vector control. House screening, a non-insecticidal method, has a long history in malaria control, but is still not widely adopted in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to add to the evidence base for this intervention in low transmission settings by assessing the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of house screening in areas where LLINs are conventionally used for malaria control. METHODS: A two-armed, household randomized clinical trial will be conducted in Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe to evaluate whether combined the use of house screens and LLINs affords better protection against clinical malaria in children between 6 months and 13 years compared to the sole use of LLINs. Eight hundred households will be enrolled in each study area, where 400 households will be randomly assigned the intervention, house screening, and LLINs while the control households will be provided with LLINs only. Clinical malaria incidence will be estimated by actively following up one child from each household for 6 months over the malaria transmission season. Cross-sectional parasite prevalence will be estimated by testing all participating children for malaria parasites at the beginning and end of each transmission season using rapid diagnostic tests. CDC light traps and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) will be used to sample adult mosquitoes and evaluate the impact of house screening on indoor mosquito density, species distribution, and sporozoite rates. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute epidemiological data on the impact of house screening on malaria transmission and assess the feasibility of its implementation on a programmatic scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov PACTR202008524310568. Registered on August 11, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8646012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86460122021-12-06 Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial Sangoro, Onyango P. Fillinger, Ulrike Saili, Kochelani Nkya, Theresia Estomih Marubu, Rose Masaninga, Freddie Trigo, Sonia Casimiro Tarumbwa, Casper Hamainza, Busiku Baltazar, Candrinho Mberikunashe, Joseph Chisanga, Brian Menale, Kassie Chanda, Emmanuel Mutero, Clifford Maina Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Concerted effort to control malaria has had a substantial impact on the transmission of the disease in the past two decades. In areas where reduced malaria transmission is being sustained through insecticide-based vector control interventions, primarily long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), non-insecticidal complementary tools will likely be needed to push towards malaria elimination. Once interruption in local disease transmission is achieved, insecticide-based measures can be scaled down gradually and eventually phased out, saving on costs of sustaining control programs and mitigating any unintended negative health and environmental impacts posed by insecticides. These non-insecticidal methods could eventually replace insecticidal methods of vector control. House screening, a non-insecticidal method, has a long history in malaria control, but is still not widely adopted in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to add to the evidence base for this intervention in low transmission settings by assessing the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of house screening in areas where LLINs are conventionally used for malaria control. METHODS: A two-armed, household randomized clinical trial will be conducted in Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe to evaluate whether combined the use of house screens and LLINs affords better protection against clinical malaria in children between 6 months and 13 years compared to the sole use of LLINs. Eight hundred households will be enrolled in each study area, where 400 households will be randomly assigned the intervention, house screening, and LLINs while the control households will be provided with LLINs only. Clinical malaria incidence will be estimated by actively following up one child from each household for 6 months over the malaria transmission season. Cross-sectional parasite prevalence will be estimated by testing all participating children for malaria parasites at the beginning and end of each transmission season using rapid diagnostic tests. CDC light traps and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) will be used to sample adult mosquitoes and evaluate the impact of house screening on indoor mosquito density, species distribution, and sporozoite rates. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute epidemiological data on the impact of house screening on malaria transmission and assess the feasibility of its implementation on a programmatic scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov PACTR202008524310568. Registered on August 11, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7. BioMed Central 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8646012/ /pubmed/34872600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Sangoro, Onyango P. Fillinger, Ulrike Saili, Kochelani Nkya, Theresia Estomih Marubu, Rose Masaninga, Freddie Trigo, Sonia Casimiro Tarumbwa, Casper Hamainza, Busiku Baltazar, Candrinho Mberikunashe, Joseph Chisanga, Brian Menale, Kassie Chanda, Emmanuel Mutero, Clifford Maina Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
title | Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
title_full | Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
title_short | Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
title_sort | evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sangoroonyangop evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT fillingerulrike evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT sailikochelani evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT nkyatheresiaestomih evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT maruburose evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT masaningafreddie evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT trigosoniacasimiro evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT tarumbwacasper evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT hamainzabusiku evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT baltazarcandrinho evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT mberikunashejoseph evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT chisangabrian evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT menalekassie evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT chandaemmanuel evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial AT muterocliffordmaina evaluatingtheefficacyimpactandfeasibilityofcommunitybasedhousescreeningasacomplementarymalariacontrolinterventioninsouthernafricaastudyprotocolforahouseholdrandomizedtrial |