Cargando…
Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961 |
_version_ | 1784610453424439296 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Xinyue Sun, Yiteng Zheng, Xinyi Wang, Xinrong Deng, Xuemei Wang, Mei |
author_facet | Fang, Xinyue Sun, Yiteng Zheng, Xinyi Wang, Xinrong Deng, Xuemei Wang, Mei |
author_sort | Fang, Xinyue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8646095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86460952021-12-07 Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking Fang, Xinyue Sun, Yiteng Zheng, Xinyi Wang, Xinrong Deng, Xuemei Wang, Mei Front Psychol Psychology Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8646095/ /pubmed/34880817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fang, Sun, Zheng, Wang, Deng and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Fang, Xinyue Sun, Yiteng Zheng, Xinyi Wang, Xinrong Deng, Xuemei Wang, Mei Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking |
title | Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking |
title_full | Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking |
title_fullStr | Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking |
title_short | Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking |
title_sort | assessing deception in questionnaire surveys with eye-tracking |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangxinyue assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT sunyiteng assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT zhengxinyi assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT wangxinrong assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT dengxuemei assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT wangmei assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking |