Cargando…

Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking

Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Xinyue, Sun, Yiteng, Zheng, Xinyi, Wang, Xinrong, Deng, Xuemei, Wang, Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961
_version_ 1784610453424439296
author Fang, Xinyue
Sun, Yiteng
Zheng, Xinyi
Wang, Xinrong
Deng, Xuemei
Wang, Mei
author_facet Fang, Xinyue
Sun, Yiteng
Zheng, Xinyi
Wang, Xinrong
Deng, Xuemei
Wang, Mei
author_sort Fang, Xinyue
collection PubMed
description Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8646095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86460952021-12-07 Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking Fang, Xinyue Sun, Yiteng Zheng, Xinyi Wang, Xinrong Deng, Xuemei Wang, Mei Front Psychol Psychology Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8646095/ /pubmed/34880817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fang, Sun, Zheng, Wang, Deng and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Fang, Xinyue
Sun, Yiteng
Zheng, Xinyi
Wang, Xinrong
Deng, Xuemei
Wang, Mei
Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_full Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_fullStr Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_short Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_sort assessing deception in questionnaire surveys with eye-tracking
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961
work_keys_str_mv AT fangxinyue assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking
AT sunyiteng assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking
AT zhengxinyi assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking
AT wangxinrong assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking
AT dengxuemei assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking
AT wangmei assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking