Cargando…

Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis

BACKGROUND: Both National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Chinese guidelines recommend beginning prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for men aged 50 years or 45 years with a family history because they were at a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Several model-based economic evaluatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Xiaojian, Ye, Dingwei, Gu, Chengyuan, Huang, Yongqiang, Gu, Weijie, Dai, Bo, Zhang, Hailiang, Zhu, Yao, Yang, Han, Qu, Shuli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100653
_version_ 1784610460534833152
author Qin, Xiaojian
Ye, Dingwei
Gu, Chengyuan
Huang, Yongqiang
Gu, Weijie
Dai, Bo
Zhang, Hailiang
Zhu, Yao
Yang, Han
Qu, Shuli
author_facet Qin, Xiaojian
Ye, Dingwei
Gu, Chengyuan
Huang, Yongqiang
Gu, Weijie
Dai, Bo
Zhang, Hailiang
Zhu, Yao
Yang, Han
Qu, Shuli
author_sort Qin, Xiaojian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Chinese guidelines recommend beginning prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for men aged 50 years or 45 years with a family history because they were at a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Several model-based economic evaluations of PSA screening studies have been conducted, but with little evidence from China. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct an economic evaluation of the cost-utility of PSA-based prostate cancer screening in Chinese men. METHODS: We developed a decision-tree and Markov model in Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Washington) to compare 2 strategies that can be used to detect prostate cancer: PSA-based screening followed by a biopsy, and non-PSA screening. We assumed that the patients would repeat screening in subsequent years if their first-year PSA value was higher than 4.0 ng/mL. The model adopted health care system perspective and lifetime horizon. Screening efficacy, cost, utility, and long-term survival of prostate cancer were retrieved from published literature and physician surveys. Both quality-adjusted life year and costs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Uncertainty was assessed by 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Our model also calculated the risk-to-benefit ratio as the ratio of overdiagnosis (biopsy without diagnosed) to prostate cancer-related deaths prevented in different age groups. RESULTS: The results suggested that PSA-based screening was cost-effective compared with no PSA screening, with an incremental cost-utility ratio of ¥11,381 ($1821/€1480) per quality-adjusted life year. This value was less than the threshold of 1-time gross domestic product per capita in China (ie, ¥70,892 [$11,343/€9216]). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. The risk-to-benefit ratios of the 50 to 65 years and the 65 to 80 years age groups were 1.3 and 2.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSA-based prostate cancer screening appears to be cost-effective in some high-risk Chinese men. PSA screening (PSA testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy if positive) can be recommended for Chinese men aged 50 to 65 years because this approach had the lowest risk-to-benefit ratio. The approach should be further adapted based on future updated data. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX) © 2022 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8646126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86461262021-12-15 Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis Qin, Xiaojian Ye, Dingwei Gu, Chengyuan Huang, Yongqiang Gu, Weijie Dai, Bo Zhang, Hailiang Zhu, Yao Yang, Han Qu, Shuli Curr Ther Res Clin Exp Original Research BACKGROUND: Both National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Chinese guidelines recommend beginning prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for men aged 50 years or 45 years with a family history because they were at a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Several model-based economic evaluations of PSA screening studies have been conducted, but with little evidence from China. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct an economic evaluation of the cost-utility of PSA-based prostate cancer screening in Chinese men. METHODS: We developed a decision-tree and Markov model in Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Washington) to compare 2 strategies that can be used to detect prostate cancer: PSA-based screening followed by a biopsy, and non-PSA screening. We assumed that the patients would repeat screening in subsequent years if their first-year PSA value was higher than 4.0 ng/mL. The model adopted health care system perspective and lifetime horizon. Screening efficacy, cost, utility, and long-term survival of prostate cancer were retrieved from published literature and physician surveys. Both quality-adjusted life year and costs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Uncertainty was assessed by 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Our model also calculated the risk-to-benefit ratio as the ratio of overdiagnosis (biopsy without diagnosed) to prostate cancer-related deaths prevented in different age groups. RESULTS: The results suggested that PSA-based screening was cost-effective compared with no PSA screening, with an incremental cost-utility ratio of ¥11,381 ($1821/€1480) per quality-adjusted life year. This value was less than the threshold of 1-time gross domestic product per capita in China (ie, ¥70,892 [$11,343/€9216]). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. The risk-to-benefit ratios of the 50 to 65 years and the 65 to 80 years age groups were 1.3 and 2.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSA-based prostate cancer screening appears to be cost-effective in some high-risk Chinese men. PSA screening (PSA testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy if positive) can be recommended for Chinese men aged 50 to 65 years because this approach had the lowest risk-to-benefit ratio. The approach should be further adapted based on future updated data. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX) © 2022 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. Elsevier 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8646126/ /pubmed/34917218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100653 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Qin, Xiaojian
Ye, Dingwei
Gu, Chengyuan
Huang, Yongqiang
Gu, Weijie
Dai, Bo
Zhang, Hailiang
Zhu, Yao
Yang, Han
Qu, Shuli
Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis
title Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis
title_full Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis
title_fullStr Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis
title_short Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis
title_sort prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen tests in a high-risk population in china: a cost-utility analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100653
work_keys_str_mv AT qinxiaojian prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT yedingwei prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT guchengyuan prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT huangyongqiang prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT guweijie prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT daibo prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT zhanghailiang prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT zhuyao prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT yanghan prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis
AT qushuli prostatecancerscreeningusingprostatespecificantigentestsinahighriskpopulationinchinaacostutilityanalysis