Cargando…
Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November–December 2020. METHODS: Respondents provided data on socio‐political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899 |
_version_ | 1784610505060515840 |
---|---|
author | McBride, Orla Butter, Sarah Murphy, Jamie Shevlin, Mark Hartman, Todd K. Bennett, Kate M. Stocks, Thomas V. A. Lloyd, Alex McKay, Ryan Gibson‐Miller, Jilly Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. Hyland, Philip Vallières, Frédérique Karatzias, Thanos Valiente, Carmen Vazquez, Carmelo Bentall, Richard P. |
author_facet | McBride, Orla Butter, Sarah Murphy, Jamie Shevlin, Mark Hartman, Todd K. Bennett, Kate M. Stocks, Thomas V. A. Lloyd, Alex McKay, Ryan Gibson‐Miller, Jilly Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. Hyland, Philip Vallières, Frédérique Karatzias, Thanos Valiente, Carmen Vazquez, Carmelo Bentall, Richard P. |
author_sort | McBride, Orla |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November–December 2020. METHODS: Respondents provided data on socio‐political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). In Phase 1, adults (N = 2878) were reinvited to participate. At Phase 2, new recruitment: (i) replenished the longitudinal strand to account for attrition; and (ii) oversampled from the devolved UK nations to facilitate robust between‐country analyses for core study outcomes. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was representative of the baseline sample characteristics. RESULTS: In Phase 1, 1796 adults were successfully recontacted and provided full interviews at Wave 4 (62.4% retention rate). In Phase 2, 292 new respondents were recruited to replenish the panel, as well as 1779 adults from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, who were representative of the socio‐political composition of the adult populations in these nations. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1% of population estimates for selected socio‐demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: The C19PRC Study offers a unique opportunity to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8646695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86466952021-12-06 Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 McBride, Orla Butter, Sarah Murphy, Jamie Shevlin, Mark Hartman, Todd K. Bennett, Kate M. Stocks, Thomas V. A. Lloyd, Alex McKay, Ryan Gibson‐Miller, Jilly Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. Hyland, Philip Vallières, Frédérique Karatzias, Thanos Valiente, Carmen Vazquez, Carmelo Bentall, Richard P. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November–December 2020. METHODS: Respondents provided data on socio‐political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). In Phase 1, adults (N = 2878) were reinvited to participate. At Phase 2, new recruitment: (i) replenished the longitudinal strand to account for attrition; and (ii) oversampled from the devolved UK nations to facilitate robust between‐country analyses for core study outcomes. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was representative of the baseline sample characteristics. RESULTS: In Phase 1, 1796 adults were successfully recontacted and provided full interviews at Wave 4 (62.4% retention rate). In Phase 2, 292 new respondents were recruited to replenish the panel, as well as 1779 adults from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, who were representative of the socio‐political composition of the adult populations in these nations. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1% of population estimates for selected socio‐demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: The C19PRC Study offers a unique opportunity to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8646695/ /pubmed/34739156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles McBride, Orla Butter, Sarah Murphy, Jamie Shevlin, Mark Hartman, Todd K. Bennett, Kate M. Stocks, Thomas V. A. Lloyd, Alex McKay, Ryan Gibson‐Miller, Jilly Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. Hyland, Philip Vallières, Frédérique Karatzias, Thanos Valiente, Carmen Vazquez, Carmelo Bentall, Richard P. Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 |
title | Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 |
title_full | Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 |
title_fullStr | Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 |
title_full_unstemmed | Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 |
title_short | Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 |
title_sort | design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the covid‐19 psychological research consortium (c19prc) study – wave 4 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcbrideorla designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT buttersarah designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT murphyjamie designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT shevlinmark designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT hartmantoddk designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT bennettkatem designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT stocksthomasva designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT lloydalex designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT mckayryan designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT gibsonmillerjilly designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT levitaliat designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT masonliam designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT martinezantonp designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT hylandphilip designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT vallieresfrederique designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT karatziasthanos designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT valientecarmen designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT vazquezcarmelo designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 AT bentallrichardp designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4 |