Cargando…

Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4

OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November–December 2020. METHODS: Respondents provided data on socio‐political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McBride, Orla, Butter, Sarah, Murphy, Jamie, Shevlin, Mark, Hartman, Todd K., Bennett, Kate M., Stocks, Thomas V. A., Lloyd, Alex, McKay, Ryan, Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Martinez, Anton P., Hyland, Philip, Vallières, Frédérique, Karatzias, Thanos, Valiente, Carmen, Vazquez, Carmelo, Bentall, Richard P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899
_version_ 1784610505060515840
author McBride, Orla
Butter, Sarah
Murphy, Jamie
Shevlin, Mark
Hartman, Todd K.
Bennett, Kate M.
Stocks, Thomas V. A.
Lloyd, Alex
McKay, Ryan
Gibson‐Miller, Jilly
Levita, Liat
Mason, Liam
Martinez, Anton P.
Hyland, Philip
Vallières, Frédérique
Karatzias, Thanos
Valiente, Carmen
Vazquez, Carmelo
Bentall, Richard P.
author_facet McBride, Orla
Butter, Sarah
Murphy, Jamie
Shevlin, Mark
Hartman, Todd K.
Bennett, Kate M.
Stocks, Thomas V. A.
Lloyd, Alex
McKay, Ryan
Gibson‐Miller, Jilly
Levita, Liat
Mason, Liam
Martinez, Anton P.
Hyland, Philip
Vallières, Frédérique
Karatzias, Thanos
Valiente, Carmen
Vazquez, Carmelo
Bentall, Richard P.
author_sort McBride, Orla
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November–December 2020. METHODS: Respondents provided data on socio‐political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). In Phase 1, adults (N = 2878) were reinvited to participate. At Phase 2, new recruitment: (i) replenished the longitudinal strand to account for attrition; and (ii) oversampled from the devolved UK nations to facilitate robust between‐country analyses for core study outcomes. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was representative of the baseline sample characteristics. RESULTS: In Phase 1, 1796 adults were successfully recontacted and provided full interviews at Wave 4 (62.4% retention rate). In Phase 2, 292 new respondents were recruited to replenish the panel, as well as 1779 adults from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, who were representative of the socio‐political composition of the adult populations in these nations. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1% of population estimates for selected socio‐demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: The C19PRC Study offers a unique opportunity to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8646695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86466952021-12-06 Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 McBride, Orla Butter, Sarah Murphy, Jamie Shevlin, Mark Hartman, Todd K. Bennett, Kate M. Stocks, Thomas V. A. Lloyd, Alex McKay, Ryan Gibson‐Miller, Jilly Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. Hyland, Philip Vallières, Frédérique Karatzias, Thanos Valiente, Carmen Vazquez, Carmelo Bentall, Richard P. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November–December 2020. METHODS: Respondents provided data on socio‐political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). In Phase 1, adults (N = 2878) were reinvited to participate. At Phase 2, new recruitment: (i) replenished the longitudinal strand to account for attrition; and (ii) oversampled from the devolved UK nations to facilitate robust between‐country analyses for core study outcomes. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was representative of the baseline sample characteristics. RESULTS: In Phase 1, 1796 adults were successfully recontacted and provided full interviews at Wave 4 (62.4% retention rate). In Phase 2, 292 new respondents were recruited to replenish the panel, as well as 1779 adults from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, who were representative of the socio‐political composition of the adult populations in these nations. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1% of population estimates for selected socio‐demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: The C19PRC Study offers a unique opportunity to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8646695/ /pubmed/34739156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
McBride, Orla
Butter, Sarah
Murphy, Jamie
Shevlin, Mark
Hartman, Todd K.
Bennett, Kate M.
Stocks, Thomas V. A.
Lloyd, Alex
McKay, Ryan
Gibson‐Miller, Jilly
Levita, Liat
Mason, Liam
Martinez, Anton P.
Hyland, Philip
Vallières, Frédérique
Karatzias, Thanos
Valiente, Carmen
Vazquez, Carmelo
Bentall, Richard P.
Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
title Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
title_full Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
title_fullStr Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
title_full_unstemmed Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
title_short Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
title_sort design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the covid‐19 psychological research consortium (c19prc) study – wave 4
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899
work_keys_str_mv AT mcbrideorla designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT buttersarah designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT murphyjamie designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT shevlinmark designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT hartmantoddk designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT bennettkatem designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT stocksthomasva designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT lloydalex designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT mckayryan designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT gibsonmillerjilly designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT levitaliat designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT masonliam designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT martinezantonp designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT hylandphilip designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT vallieresfrederique designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT karatziasthanos designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT valientecarmen designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT vazquezcarmelo designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4
AT bentallrichardp designcontentandfieldworkproceduresofthecovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumc19prcstudywave4