Cargando…

Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the current gold standard of treatment for overhead athletes with a symptomatic, deficient UCL of the elbow who have failed nonoperative treatment and wish to return to sport (RTS) at a high level. The palmaris longus and hamstring tendon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trofa, David P., Constant, Michael, Crutchfield, Connor R., Dantzker, Nicholas J., Saltzman, Bryan M., Lynch, T. Sean, Ahmad, Christopher S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211055726
_version_ 1784610513243602944
author Trofa, David P.
Constant, Michael
Crutchfield, Connor R.
Dantzker, Nicholas J.
Saltzman, Bryan M.
Lynch, T. Sean
Ahmad, Christopher S.
author_facet Trofa, David P.
Constant, Michael
Crutchfield, Connor R.
Dantzker, Nicholas J.
Saltzman, Bryan M.
Lynch, T. Sean
Ahmad, Christopher S.
author_sort Trofa, David P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the current gold standard of treatment for overhead athletes with a symptomatic, deficient UCL of the elbow who have failed nonoperative treatment and wish to return to sport (RTS) at a high level. The palmaris longus and hamstring tendons are common graft choices, but no study has analyzed the existing literature to assess whether one graft is superior to the other. PURPOSE: To systematically report on the outcomes of UCL reconstruction using palmaris and hamstring autografts. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A combination of the terms “ulnar collateral ligament,” “valgus instability,” “Tommy John surgery,” “hamstring,” and “palmaris longus” were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. RTS and return-to-same-level (RSL) rates, patient-reported outcomes, and complications were included for analysis. We used the modified Coleman Methodology Score and risk-of-bias tool for nonrandomized studies to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: This review included 6 studies (combined total of 2154 elbows) that directly compared palmaris and hamstring graft use in UCL reconstruction. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 80.4 months, and the mean patient age across all studies was 21.8 years. The mean RSL across all studies and grafts was 79.0%, and the mean RTS was 84.1%, consistent with results previously reported in the literature. The mean RTS and RSL rates for the palmaris graft group were 84.6% and 82%, respectively; the hamstring graft group showed mean RTS and RSL rates of 80.8% and 80.8%. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in RSL between the 2 graft groups (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.46). The combined complication rate of the included studies was 18.2%, with failure rates ranging from 0% to 7.1%. CONCLUSION: Results of this review indicated that both palmaris and hamstring tendon grafts are viable options for primary UCL reconstruction. Graft choice should be determined by a combination of patient and surgeon preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8646802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86468022021-12-07 Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review Trofa, David P. Constant, Michael Crutchfield, Connor R. Dantzker, Nicholas J. Saltzman, Bryan M. Lynch, T. Sean Ahmad, Christopher S. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the current gold standard of treatment for overhead athletes with a symptomatic, deficient UCL of the elbow who have failed nonoperative treatment and wish to return to sport (RTS) at a high level. The palmaris longus and hamstring tendons are common graft choices, but no study has analyzed the existing literature to assess whether one graft is superior to the other. PURPOSE: To systematically report on the outcomes of UCL reconstruction using palmaris and hamstring autografts. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A combination of the terms “ulnar collateral ligament,” “valgus instability,” “Tommy John surgery,” “hamstring,” and “palmaris longus” were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. RTS and return-to-same-level (RSL) rates, patient-reported outcomes, and complications were included for analysis. We used the modified Coleman Methodology Score and risk-of-bias tool for nonrandomized studies to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: This review included 6 studies (combined total of 2154 elbows) that directly compared palmaris and hamstring graft use in UCL reconstruction. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 80.4 months, and the mean patient age across all studies was 21.8 years. The mean RSL across all studies and grafts was 79.0%, and the mean RTS was 84.1%, consistent with results previously reported in the literature. The mean RTS and RSL rates for the palmaris graft group were 84.6% and 82%, respectively; the hamstring graft group showed mean RTS and RSL rates of 80.8% and 80.8%. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in RSL between the 2 graft groups (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.46). The combined complication rate of the included studies was 18.2%, with failure rates ranging from 0% to 7.1%. CONCLUSION: Results of this review indicated that both palmaris and hamstring tendon grafts are viable options for primary UCL reconstruction. Graft choice should be determined by a combination of patient and surgeon preference. SAGE Publications 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8646802/ /pubmed/34881347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211055726 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Trofa, David P.
Constant, Michael
Crutchfield, Connor R.
Dantzker, Nicholas J.
Saltzman, Bryan M.
Lynch, T. Sean
Ahmad, Christopher S.
Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review
title Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review
title_full Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review
title_short Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review
title_sort return-to-sport outcomes after primary ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with palmaris versus hamstring tendon grafts: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211055726
work_keys_str_mv AT trofadavidp returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview
AT constantmichael returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview
AT crutchfieldconnorr returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview
AT dantzkernicholasj returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview
AT saltzmanbryanm returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview
AT lynchtsean returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview
AT ahmadchristophers returntosportoutcomesafterprimaryulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionwithpalmarisversushamstringtendongraftsasystematicreview