Cargando…

Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG)

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the dependability of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) compared with handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography (MG) on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category and size assessment of malignant breast lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chen, He, Han, Ming, Jing, Hui, Liu, Zhao, Shang, Haitao, Wang, Qiucheng, Cheng, Wen
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Dove 2021
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S342567

Ejemplares similares

A Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Handheld Ultrasound Examination (HHUS) or Automated Ultrasound Examination (ABVS) in Women with Dense Breast
por: Brunetti, Nicole, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS): Potential for Home Palliative Care
por: Lo, Hendra, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Potential of Adding Mammography to Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Ultrasound Category 4a: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Study in China
por: Ren, Wenhui, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Detectability and Usefulness of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Handheld Breast Ultrasound
por: Choi, Jae Jeong, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
por: Ibraheem, Shahad A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of the background echotexture between automated breast ultrasound and handheld breast ultrasound
por: Kim, Jieun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program
por: Huang, Xiaoxi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prediction model of axillary lymph node status using automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and ki-67 status in early-stage breast cancer
por: Wang, Qiucheng, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Influence of Breast Density on Patient's Compliance during Ultrasound Examination: Conventional Handheld Breast Ultrasound Compared to Automated Breast Ultrasound
por: De Giorgis, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predicting Breast Cancer in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Ultrasound Category 4 or 5 Lesions: A Nomogram Combining Radiomics and BI-RADS
por: Luo, Wei-quan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses
por: Yun, Gabin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of (99m)Tc-MIBI scintigraphy, ultrasound, and mammography for the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 category lesions
por: Liu, Hongbiao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography and their BI-RADS in detection of breast malignancy
por: Ghaemian, Naser, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Fully automatic classification of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) imaging according to BI-RADS using a deep convolutional neural network
por: Hejduk, Patryk, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Downgrade BI-RADS 4A Patients Using Nomogram Based on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, and Mammography
por: Xie, Yamie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interobserver concordance in the BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound exams
por: Calas, Maria Julia G, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts
por: Kelly, Kevin M., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses: methodological errors in the reliability analysis
por: Sabour, Siamak
Publicado: (2020)

Non-mass lesions on breast ultrasound: why does not the ACR BI-RADS breast ultrasound lexicon add the terminology?
por: Uematsu, Takayoshi
Publicado: (2023)

Breast cancer detection: radiologists’ performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound
por: Kelly, Kevin M., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

CEUS Helps to Rerate Small Breast Tumors of BI-RADS Category 3 and Category 4
por: Zhang, Jian-xing, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS)-based radiomics nomogram: an individualized tool for predicting axillary lymph node tumor burden in patients with early breast cancer
por: Chen, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Associating Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) in Clinical Practice in Cases of Women with Dense Breast Tissue
por: Boca (Bene), Ioana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Two-stage CNNs for computerized BI-RADS categorization in breast ultrasound images
por: Huang, Yunzhi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors
por: Sohns, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions
por: Klarić, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Epidermoid cyst of the breast: Mammography, ultrasound, MRI
por: Wynne, Elisabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Re-evaluation of high-risk breast mammography lesions by target ultrasound and ABUS of breast non-mass-like lesions
por: Zhang, Jianxing, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses
por: Interlenghi, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3–5 lesions
por: Janu, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Association between ultrasound BI-RADS signs and molecular typing of invasive breast cancer
por: Pan, Qiao-Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Agreement in breast lesion assessment and final BI-RADS classification between radial and meander-like breast ultrasound
por: Brasier-Lutz, Pascale, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
por: Boca (Bene), Ioana, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital
por: Noonpradej, Seechad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Radiomic Applications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis of BI-RADS Category 4 Calcifications Sent for Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
por: Favati, Benedetta, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis
por: Ezeana, Chika F., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts
por: Ha, Su Min, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Subdividing BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging: Is it feasible?
por: Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts
por: Philadelpho, Fernanda, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study
por: Niu, Zihan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_18kce6bs52j320gb6joto6u45r