Cargando…
Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy for Cervical Artery Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Carotid and vertebral artery dissections are estimated to account for ∼20% of strokes in patients under 45-years-old. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents to determine the optimal therapy. We searched 4 electronic databases f...
Autores principales: | Ye, Sheng-Lin, Wang, Chuang, Wang, Lu-Lu, Xu, Tian-Ze, Li, Xiao-Qiang, Tang, Tao |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296211051708 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Antiplatelets or anticoagulants? Secondary prevention in cervical artery dissection: an updated meta-analysis
por: The, Ei Zune, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Antiplatelets versus Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Cervical Artery Dissection: Bayesian Meta-Analysis
por: Sarikaya, Hakan, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Correction: Antiplatelets versus Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Cervical Artery Dissection: Bayesian Meta-Analysis
por: Sarikaya, Hakan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Antiplatelet vs. Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Liu, Sihua, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulant Therapy Versus Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
por: Yan, Xiaodi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)