Cargando…

Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy (trimodality therapy). We compared the long-term oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (M-ILE) cohort with a propensity score weighted cohort of open I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merritt, Robert E., Kneuertz, Peter J., Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud, D’Souza, Desmond M., Perry, Kyle A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01728-z
_version_ 1784610586495025152
author Merritt, Robert E.
Kneuertz, Peter J.
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
D’Souza, Desmond M.
Perry, Kyle A.
author_facet Merritt, Robert E.
Kneuertz, Peter J.
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
D’Souza, Desmond M.
Perry, Kyle A.
author_sort Merritt, Robert E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy (trimodality therapy). We compared the long-term oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (M-ILE) cohort with a propensity score weighted cohort of open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (O-ILE) cases after trimodality therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 223 patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by M-ILE or O-ILE from April 2009 to February 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment was used to balance the baseline characteristics between study groups. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated for overall survival and recurrence-free survival comparing the two groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine predictive variables for overall and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: The IPTW cohort included patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent M-ILE (n = 142) or O-ILE (n = 68). The overall rate of postoperative adverse events was not significantly different after IPTW adjustment between the O-ILE and M-ILE trimodality groups (53.4% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.089). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the M-ILE group was 59.4% (95% CI: 49.8–67.8) compared to 55.7% (95% CI: 39.2–69.4) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.670). The 3-year recurrence-free survival for the M-ILE group was 59.9% (95% CI: 50.2–68.2) compared to 61.6% (95% CI: 41.9–76.3) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.357). A complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was significantly predictive of improved OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: The overall and recurrence-free survival rates for M-ILE were not significantly different from O-ILE for esophageal carcinoma after trimodality therapy. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was predictive of improved overall and recurrence- free survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8647339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86473392021-12-06 Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study Merritt, Robert E. Kneuertz, Peter J. Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud D’Souza, Desmond M. Perry, Kyle A. J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy (trimodality therapy). We compared the long-term oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (M-ILE) cohort with a propensity score weighted cohort of open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (O-ILE) cases after trimodality therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 223 patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by M-ILE or O-ILE from April 2009 to February 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment was used to balance the baseline characteristics between study groups. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated for overall survival and recurrence-free survival comparing the two groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine predictive variables for overall and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: The IPTW cohort included patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent M-ILE (n = 142) or O-ILE (n = 68). The overall rate of postoperative adverse events was not significantly different after IPTW adjustment between the O-ILE and M-ILE trimodality groups (53.4% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.089). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the M-ILE group was 59.4% (95% CI: 49.8–67.8) compared to 55.7% (95% CI: 39.2–69.4) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.670). The 3-year recurrence-free survival for the M-ILE group was 59.9% (95% CI: 50.2–68.2) compared to 61.6% (95% CI: 41.9–76.3) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.357). A complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was significantly predictive of improved OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: The overall and recurrence-free survival rates for M-ILE were not significantly different from O-ILE for esophageal carcinoma after trimodality therapy. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was predictive of improved overall and recurrence- free survival. BioMed Central 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8647339/ /pubmed/34872562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01728-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Merritt, Robert E.
Kneuertz, Peter J.
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
D’Souza, Desmond M.
Perry, Kyle A.
Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
title Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
title_full Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
title_short Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
title_sort comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open ivor lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01728-z
work_keys_str_mv AT merrittroberte comparativeanalysisoflongtermoncologicoutcomesforminimallyinvasiveandopenivorlewisesophagectomyafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationapropensityscorematchedobservationalstudy
AT kneuertzpeterj comparativeanalysisoflongtermoncologicoutcomesforminimallyinvasiveandopenivorlewisesophagectomyafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationapropensityscorematchedobservationalstudy
AT abdelrasoulmahmoud comparativeanalysisoflongtermoncologicoutcomesforminimallyinvasiveandopenivorlewisesophagectomyafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationapropensityscorematchedobservationalstudy
AT dsouzadesmondm comparativeanalysisoflongtermoncologicoutcomesforminimallyinvasiveandopenivorlewisesophagectomyafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationapropensityscorematchedobservationalstudy
AT perrykylea comparativeanalysisoflongtermoncologicoutcomesforminimallyinvasiveandopenivorlewisesophagectomyafterneoadjuvantchemoradiationapropensityscorematchedobservationalstudy