Cargando…
Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
BACKGROUND: Advances in technology and the expansion of nursing roles have led to complex ethical issues in nursing. Nursing students are the future clinical nursing workers and practitioners. The ethical sensitivity of nursing students is very important to the professional development of nursing st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00768-z |
_version_ | 1784610591354126336 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Haitao Tong, Tong Gao, Ye Zhang, Hui Tong, Huijuan Liang, Chunguang |
author_facet | Yu, Haitao Tong, Tong Gao, Ye Zhang, Hui Tong, Huijuan Liang, Chunguang |
author_sort | Yu, Haitao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advances in technology and the expansion of nursing roles have led to complex ethical issues in nursing. Nursing students are the future clinical nursing workers and practitioners. The ethical sensitivity of nursing students is very important to the professional development of nursing students, which can strengthen the ethical cognition of nursing students, improve the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students, and is beneficial to the development of nursing students in the process of clinical practice and nursing education. However, there are no instruments to evaluate the ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students (ESQ-NS). METHODS: After obtaining the authorization of the author of the original scale, the study used the Brislin back-translation method for translation. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to examine the underlying factor structure of the translated questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient, the test-retest reliability, and the corrected item-total correlation were calculated to verify the internal consistency of the scale. RESULTS: The Chinese version of ESQ-NS retained 13 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracts four common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate is 62.479%. The CFA reached the adaptive standard, and the discriminant validity of the scale was good. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of this scale was 0.821, and 4 dimensions were between 0.708 and 0.738. The results of the test-retest showed that Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the overall ESQ-NS was 0.814. Corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.337 to 0.542. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the ESQ-NS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the level of ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8647363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86473632021-12-07 Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students Yu, Haitao Tong, Tong Gao, Ye Zhang, Hui Tong, Huijuan Liang, Chunguang BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Advances in technology and the expansion of nursing roles have led to complex ethical issues in nursing. Nursing students are the future clinical nursing workers and practitioners. The ethical sensitivity of nursing students is very important to the professional development of nursing students, which can strengthen the ethical cognition of nursing students, improve the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students, and is beneficial to the development of nursing students in the process of clinical practice and nursing education. However, there are no instruments to evaluate the ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students (ESQ-NS). METHODS: After obtaining the authorization of the author of the original scale, the study used the Brislin back-translation method for translation. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to examine the underlying factor structure of the translated questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient, the test-retest reliability, and the corrected item-total correlation were calculated to verify the internal consistency of the scale. RESULTS: The Chinese version of ESQ-NS retained 13 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracts four common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate is 62.479%. The CFA reached the adaptive standard, and the discriminant validity of the scale was good. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of this scale was 0.821, and 4 dimensions were between 0.708 and 0.738. The results of the test-retest showed that Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the overall ESQ-NS was 0.814. Corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.337 to 0.542. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the ESQ-NS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the level of ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. BioMed Central 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8647363/ /pubmed/34872552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00768-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yu, Haitao Tong, Tong Gao, Ye Zhang, Hui Tong, Huijuan Liang, Chunguang Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
title | Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
title_full | Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
title_short | Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
title_sort | reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00768-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuhaitao reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents AT tongtong reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents AT gaoye reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents AT zhanghui reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents AT tonghuijuan reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents AT liangchunguang reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents |