Cargando…

Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students

BACKGROUND: Advances in technology and the expansion of nursing roles have led to complex ethical issues in nursing. Nursing students are the future clinical nursing workers and practitioners. The ethical sensitivity of nursing students is very important to the professional development of nursing st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Haitao, Tong, Tong, Gao, Ye, Zhang, Hui, Tong, Huijuan, Liang, Chunguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00768-z
_version_ 1784610591354126336
author Yu, Haitao
Tong, Tong
Gao, Ye
Zhang, Hui
Tong, Huijuan
Liang, Chunguang
author_facet Yu, Haitao
Tong, Tong
Gao, Ye
Zhang, Hui
Tong, Huijuan
Liang, Chunguang
author_sort Yu, Haitao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advances in technology and the expansion of nursing roles have led to complex ethical issues in nursing. Nursing students are the future clinical nursing workers and practitioners. The ethical sensitivity of nursing students is very important to the professional development of nursing students, which can strengthen the ethical cognition of nursing students, improve the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students, and is beneficial to the development of nursing students in the process of clinical practice and nursing education. However, there are no instruments to evaluate the ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students (ESQ-NS). METHODS: After obtaining the authorization of the author of the original scale, the study used the Brislin back-translation method for translation. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to examine the underlying factor structure of the translated questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient, the test-retest reliability, and the corrected item-total correlation were calculated to verify the internal consistency of the scale. RESULTS: The Chinese version of ESQ-NS retained 13 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracts four common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate is 62.479%. The CFA reached the adaptive standard, and the discriminant validity of the scale was good. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of this scale was 0.821, and 4 dimensions were between 0.708 and 0.738. The results of the test-retest showed that Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the overall ESQ-NS was 0.814. Corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.337 to 0.542. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the ESQ-NS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the level of ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8647363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86473632021-12-07 Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students Yu, Haitao Tong, Tong Gao, Ye Zhang, Hui Tong, Huijuan Liang, Chunguang BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Advances in technology and the expansion of nursing roles have led to complex ethical issues in nursing. Nursing students are the future clinical nursing workers and practitioners. The ethical sensitivity of nursing students is very important to the professional development of nursing students, which can strengthen the ethical cognition of nursing students, improve the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students, and is beneficial to the development of nursing students in the process of clinical practice and nursing education. However, there are no instruments to evaluate the ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students (ESQ-NS). METHODS: After obtaining the authorization of the author of the original scale, the study used the Brislin back-translation method for translation. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to examine the underlying factor structure of the translated questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient, the test-retest reliability, and the corrected item-total correlation were calculated to verify the internal consistency of the scale. RESULTS: The Chinese version of ESQ-NS retained 13 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracts four common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate is 62.479%. The CFA reached the adaptive standard, and the discriminant validity of the scale was good. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of this scale was 0.821, and 4 dimensions were between 0.708 and 0.738. The results of the test-retest showed that Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the overall ESQ-NS was 0.814. Corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.337 to 0.542. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the ESQ-NS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the level of ethical sensitivity of nursing students in China. BioMed Central 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8647363/ /pubmed/34872552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00768-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yu, Haitao
Tong, Tong
Gao, Ye
Zhang, Hui
Tong, Huijuan
Liang, Chunguang
Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
title Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
title_full Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
title_fullStr Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
title_short Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
title_sort reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese version of the ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00768-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhaitao reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents
AT tongtong reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents
AT gaoye reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents
AT zhanghui reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents
AT tonghuijuan reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents
AT liangchunguang reliabilityandvalidityevaluationofthechineseversionoftheethicalsensitivityquestionnairefornursingstudents