Cargando…
Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey
BACKGROUND: Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) research is an emerging field that focuses on the detection of species from their genetic remnants in the air. The majority of studies into airborne eDNA of plants has until now either focused on single species detection, specifically only pollen, or hum...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01947-x |
_version_ | 1784610614953377792 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Mark D. Fokar, Mohamed Cox, Robert D. Barnes, Matthew A. |
author_facet | Johnson, Mark D. Fokar, Mohamed Cox, Robert D. Barnes, Matthew A. |
author_sort | Johnson, Mark D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) research is an emerging field that focuses on the detection of species from their genetic remnants in the air. The majority of studies into airborne eDNA of plants has until now either focused on single species detection, specifically only pollen, or human health impacts, with no previous studies surveying an entire plant community through metabarcoding. We therefore conducted an airborne eDNA metabarcoding survey and compared the results to a traditional plant community survey. RESULTS: Over the course of a year, we conducted two traditional transect-based visual plant surveys alongside an airborne eDNA sampling campaign on a short-grass rangeland. We found that airborne eDNA detected more species than the traditional surveying method, although the types of species detected varied based on the method used. Airborne eDNA detected more grasses and forbs with less showy flowers, while the traditional method detected fewer grasses but also detected rarer forbs with large showy flowers. Additionally, we found the airborne eDNA metabarcoding survey required less sampling effort in terms of the time needed to conduct a survey and was able to detect more invasive species than the traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we have demonstrated that airborne eDNA can act as a sensitive and efficient plant community surveying method. Airborne eDNA surveillance has the potential to revolutionize the way plant communities are monitored in general, track changes in plant communities due to climate change and disturbances, and assist with the monitoring of invasive and endangered species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-021-01947-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8647488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86474882021-12-07 Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey Johnson, Mark D. Fokar, Mohamed Cox, Robert D. Barnes, Matthew A. BMC Ecol Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) research is an emerging field that focuses on the detection of species from their genetic remnants in the air. The majority of studies into airborne eDNA of plants has until now either focused on single species detection, specifically only pollen, or human health impacts, with no previous studies surveying an entire plant community through metabarcoding. We therefore conducted an airborne eDNA metabarcoding survey and compared the results to a traditional plant community survey. RESULTS: Over the course of a year, we conducted two traditional transect-based visual plant surveys alongside an airborne eDNA sampling campaign on a short-grass rangeland. We found that airborne eDNA detected more species than the traditional surveying method, although the types of species detected varied based on the method used. Airborne eDNA detected more grasses and forbs with less showy flowers, while the traditional method detected fewer grasses but also detected rarer forbs with large showy flowers. Additionally, we found the airborne eDNA metabarcoding survey required less sampling effort in terms of the time needed to conduct a survey and was able to detect more invasive species than the traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we have demonstrated that airborne eDNA can act as a sensitive and efficient plant community surveying method. Airborne eDNA surveillance has the potential to revolutionize the way plant communities are monitored in general, track changes in plant communities due to climate change and disturbances, and assist with the monitoring of invasive and endangered species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-021-01947-x. BioMed Central 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8647488/ /pubmed/34872490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01947-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Johnson, Mark D. Fokar, Mohamed Cox, Robert D. Barnes, Matthew A. Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
title | Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
title_full | Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
title_fullStr | Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
title_short | Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
title_sort | airborne environmental dna metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01947-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonmarkd airborneenvironmentaldnametabarcodingdetectsmorediversitywithlesssamplingeffortthanatraditionalplantcommunitysurvey AT fokarmohamed airborneenvironmentaldnametabarcodingdetectsmorediversitywithlesssamplingeffortthanatraditionalplantcommunitysurvey AT coxrobertd airborneenvironmentaldnametabarcodingdetectsmorediversitywithlesssamplingeffortthanatraditionalplantcommunitysurvey AT barnesmatthewa airborneenvironmentaldnametabarcodingdetectsmorediversitywithlesssamplingeffortthanatraditionalplantcommunitysurvey |