How can robot-assisted surgery provide value for money?

OBJECTIVES: To develop an interactive tool that estimates what potential benefits are needed for the robot to provide value for money when compared with endoscopic or open surgical interventions. DESIGN: A generic online interactive tool was developed to analyze the (health) effects needed to compensate for the additional costs of using a surgical robotic system from a healthcare perspective. The application of the tool is illustrated with a hypothetical new surgical robotic platform. A synthesis of evidence from different sources was used combined with interviews with surgeons. SETTING: Flexible tool that can be adapted to flexible settings. PARTICIPANTS: Any hospital patient group for which robotic, endoscopic or open surgical procedures may be considered as appropriate treatment alternatives (eg, urology, gynecology, and so on). INTERVENTION: Robotically assisted surgical interventions. COMPARATOR: Endoscopic or open surgical interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thresholds of how much (health) effect is needed for robot-assisted surgery to provide value for money and to become cost-effective. RESULTS: The utilization rate of the surgical robotic system and a reduction in complications appeared to be important aspects in determining the value for money. To become cost-effective, it was deemed important for new surgical robotic systems to have added clinical benefit and become less costly than the current system. CONCLUSIONS: This paper and its assisting interactive tool can be used by clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to gain insight in the benefit needed to provide value for money when using a (new) surgical robotic system or, when the effects are known or can be estimated, to assess the value for money for a specific indication. For robotic surgery to provide most value for money, we recommend assessing for each indication whether the necessary effects seem achievable.