Cargando…

How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alves, Charles Phiilipe de Lucena, Barreto Segundo, João de Deus, da Costa, Gabriel Gonçalves, Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana, Lima, Kenio Costa, Demarco, Flávio Fernando, Crochemore-Silva, Inácio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100202
_version_ 1784610635712036864
author Alves, Charles Phiilipe de Lucena
Barreto Segundo, João de Deus
da Costa, Gabriel Gonçalves
Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
Lima, Kenio Costa
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
Crochemore-Silva, Inácio
author_facet Alves, Charles Phiilipe de Lucena
Barreto Segundo, João de Deus
da Costa, Gabriel Gonçalves
Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
Lima, Kenio Costa
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
Crochemore-Silva, Inácio
author_sort Alves, Charles Phiilipe de Lucena
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8647590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86475902022-01-18 How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science Alves, Charles Phiilipe de Lucena Barreto Segundo, João de Deus da Costa, Gabriel Gonçalves Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana Lima, Kenio Costa Demarco, Flávio Fernando Crochemore-Silva, Inácio BMJ Open Sci Position Paper BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8647590/ /pubmed/35047704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100202 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Position Paper
Alves, Charles Phiilipe de Lucena
Barreto Segundo, João de Deus
da Costa, Gabriel Gonçalves
Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
Lima, Kenio Costa
Demarco, Flávio Fernando
Crochemore-Silva, Inácio
How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
title How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
title_full How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
title_fullStr How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
title_full_unstemmed How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
title_short How a few poorly designed COVID-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in Brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
title_sort how a few poorly designed covid-19 studies may have contributed to misinformation in brazil: the case for evidence-based communication of science
topic Position Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100202
work_keys_str_mv AT alvescharlesphiilipedelucena howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience
AT barretosegundojoaodedeus howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience
AT dacostagabrielgoncalves howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience
AT pereiracencitatiana howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience
AT limakeniocosta howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience
AT demarcoflaviofernando howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience
AT crochemoresilvainacio howafewpoorlydesignedcovid19studiesmayhavecontributedtomisinformationinbrazilthecaseforevidencebasedcommunicationofscience