Cargando…

Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification

The number of gluteal augmentation procedures with implants has increased in the last years. However, due to high complication rates related to the placement of the implants, surgeons have started to avoid using implants. The objective of the present study was to describe the details of the submuscu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aytaç, Selçuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003576
_version_ 1784610686940217344
author Aytaç, Selçuk
author_facet Aytaç, Selçuk
author_sort Aytaç, Selçuk
collection PubMed
description The number of gluteal augmentation procedures with implants has increased in the last years. However, due to high complication rates related to the placement of the implants, surgeons have started to avoid using implants. The objective of the present study was to describe the details of the submuscular gluteal augmentation technique together with lipoplasty techniques and to increase the prevalence of its use. METHODS: All methods are complementary to each other rather than being superior to each other. That is why the author has used submuscular gluteal augmentation with implant technique and lipoplasty together during the surgeries. The complication rates are lower with this easy-to-learn technique described in this article. Eighty-six patients aged 20–46 underwent surgery. The follow-up period was 6–24 months. The implants used consisted of round cohesive silicone, with the most commonly used size being 330 cm(3). The average volume of infiltrated fat was 514 cm(3). RESULTS: The sciatic nerve is well protected by the surrounding anatomical structures, indicating that submuscular technique can be used safely. Partial wound dehiscence was noted in 1 patient, implant malposition in 5 patients, and seroma in 2 patients. All patients reported that they are highly satisfied with the results of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The author advocates that the combination of lipoplasty with the submuscular technique described is safe, easy to perform, has a short operative time and low complication rates. It can be preferred in buttock beautification as a simple and safe technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8647878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86478782021-12-07 Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification Aytaç, Selçuk Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic The number of gluteal augmentation procedures with implants has increased in the last years. However, due to high complication rates related to the placement of the implants, surgeons have started to avoid using implants. The objective of the present study was to describe the details of the submuscular gluteal augmentation technique together with lipoplasty techniques and to increase the prevalence of its use. METHODS: All methods are complementary to each other rather than being superior to each other. That is why the author has used submuscular gluteal augmentation with implant technique and lipoplasty together during the surgeries. The complication rates are lower with this easy-to-learn technique described in this article. Eighty-six patients aged 20–46 underwent surgery. The follow-up period was 6–24 months. The implants used consisted of round cohesive silicone, with the most commonly used size being 330 cm(3). The average volume of infiltrated fat was 514 cm(3). RESULTS: The sciatic nerve is well protected by the surrounding anatomical structures, indicating that submuscular technique can be used safely. Partial wound dehiscence was noted in 1 patient, implant malposition in 5 patients, and seroma in 2 patients. All patients reported that they are highly satisfied with the results of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The author advocates that the combination of lipoplasty with the submuscular technique described is safe, easy to perform, has a short operative time and low complication rates. It can be preferred in buttock beautification as a simple and safe technique. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8647878/ /pubmed/34881147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003576 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Aytaç, Selçuk
Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification
title Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification
title_full Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification
title_fullStr Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification
title_full_unstemmed Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification
title_short Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty for Buttock Beautification
title_sort submuscular gluteal augmentation and lipoplasty for buttock beautification
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003576
work_keys_str_mv AT aytacselcuk submuscularglutealaugmentationandlipoplastyforbuttockbeautification