Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been used to predict the optimal time of weaning from ventilator. However, it remains controversial which trial should be preferentially selected. We aimed to compare and rank four common SBT modes including automatic tube compensation (ATC), pressur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Li-Juan, Tian, Xu, Chen, Min, Lei, Jin-Mei, Xiao, Na, Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.731196
_version_ 1784610693711921152
author Yi, Li-Juan
Tian, Xu
Chen, Min
Lei, Jin-Mei
Xiao, Na
Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F.
author_facet Yi, Li-Juan
Tian, Xu
Chen, Min
Lei, Jin-Mei
Xiao, Na
Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F.
author_sort Yi, Li-Juan
collection PubMed
description Background: Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been used to predict the optimal time of weaning from ventilator. However, it remains controversial which trial should be preferentially selected. We aimed to compare and rank four common SBT modes including automatic tube compensation (ATC), pressure support ventilation (PSV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and T-piece among critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies that investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of at least two SBT strategies among critically ill patients up to May 17, 2020. We estimated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank SBT techniques, and determined the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. Primary outcome was weaning success. Secondary outcomes were reintubation, SBT success, duration of acute care, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4, Stata, and R software. Results: We enrolled 24 trials finally. Extubation success rate was significantly higher in ATC than that in T-piece (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13–0.64) or PSV (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32–0.88). For SBT success, ATC was better than other SBT techniques, with a pooled OR ranging from 0.17 to 0.42. For reintubation rate, CPAP was worse than T-piece (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.08 to 7.06). No significant difference was detected between SBT modes for the length of stay in ICU or long-term weaning unit (LWU). Similar result was also found for ICU mortality between PSV and T-piece. Majority direct results were confirmed by network meta-analysis. Besides, ATC ranks at the first, first, and fourth place with a SUCRA of 91.7, 99.7, and 39.9%, respectively in increasing weaning success and SBT success and in prolonging ICU or LWU length of stay among four SBT strategies. The confidences in evidences were rated as low for most comparisons. Conclusion: ATC seems to be the optimal choice of predicting successful weaning from ventilator among critically ill patients. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high quality are needed to further establish these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8647911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86479112021-12-07 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Yi, Li-Juan Tian, Xu Chen, Min Lei, Jin-Mei Xiao, Na Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been used to predict the optimal time of weaning from ventilator. However, it remains controversial which trial should be preferentially selected. We aimed to compare and rank four common SBT modes including automatic tube compensation (ATC), pressure support ventilation (PSV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and T-piece among critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies that investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of at least two SBT strategies among critically ill patients up to May 17, 2020. We estimated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank SBT techniques, and determined the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. Primary outcome was weaning success. Secondary outcomes were reintubation, SBT success, duration of acute care, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4, Stata, and R software. Results: We enrolled 24 trials finally. Extubation success rate was significantly higher in ATC than that in T-piece (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13–0.64) or PSV (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32–0.88). For SBT success, ATC was better than other SBT techniques, with a pooled OR ranging from 0.17 to 0.42. For reintubation rate, CPAP was worse than T-piece (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.08 to 7.06). No significant difference was detected between SBT modes for the length of stay in ICU or long-term weaning unit (LWU). Similar result was also found for ICU mortality between PSV and T-piece. Majority direct results were confirmed by network meta-analysis. Besides, ATC ranks at the first, first, and fourth place with a SUCRA of 91.7, 99.7, and 39.9%, respectively in increasing weaning success and SBT success and in prolonging ICU or LWU length of stay among four SBT strategies. The confidences in evidences were rated as low for most comparisons. Conclusion: ATC seems to be the optimal choice of predicting successful weaning from ventilator among critically ill patients. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high quality are needed to further establish these findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8647911/ /pubmed/34881255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.731196 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yi, Tian, Chen, Lei, Xiao and Jiménez-Herrera. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Yi, Li-Juan
Tian, Xu
Chen, Min
Lei, Jin-Mei
Xiao, Na
Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F.
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of four different spontaneous breathing trials for weaning from mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.731196
work_keys_str_mv AT yilijuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffourdifferentspontaneousbreathingtrialsforweaningfrommechanicalventilationasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT tianxu comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffourdifferentspontaneousbreathingtrialsforweaningfrommechanicalventilationasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenmin comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffourdifferentspontaneousbreathingtrialsforweaningfrommechanicalventilationasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT leijinmei comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffourdifferentspontaneousbreathingtrialsforweaningfrommechanicalventilationasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiaona comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffourdifferentspontaneousbreathingtrialsforweaningfrommechanicalventilationasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jimenezherreramariaf comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffourdifferentspontaneousbreathingtrialsforweaningfrommechanicalventilationasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis