Cargando…

A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania

Anthelmintic resistance (AR) in equine cyathostomins is being reported all over the world. In Lithuania, however, the last study on this subject was published more than fifteen years ago, thus little is known about the current situation. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that may as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dauparaitė, E., Kupčinskas, T., Hoglund, J., Petkevičius, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934386
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/helm-2021-0031
_version_ 1784610700087263232
author Dauparaitė, E.
Kupčinskas, T.
Hoglund, J.
Petkevičius, S.
author_facet Dauparaitė, E.
Kupčinskas, T.
Hoglund, J.
Petkevičius, S.
author_sort Dauparaitė, E.
collection PubMed
description Anthelmintic resistance (AR) in equine cyathostomins is being reported all over the world. In Lithuania, however, the last study on this subject was published more than fifteen years ago, thus little is known about the current situation. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that may associated with the development of AR on equine studs in Lithuania. A questionnaire containing seven open-ended and nine closed multiple-choice questions about worm control strategies, use of anthelmintic substances and stable management practices was posted to 71 randomly selected horse establishments in Lithuania. Replies were obtained from a total of 59 stables, representing 83 % of officially established stud farms in Lithuania. The results showed that more than 80 % of these establishments performed pasture management practices such as excrement removal from stables and pasture, 56 % mowed their pasture, 31 % practised mixed or rotational grazing with other species, and 97 % of the horses were routinely dewormed. Macrocyclic lactones (ML) (58 %, n=33) were the most commonly used drugs, followed by benzimidazoles (BZ) (24 %, n=14) and tetrahydropyrimidines (THP) (19 %, n=10). The majority of farms (60 %) treated horses four times per year and 68 % estimated the weight of the horses by eye before treatment. About 36 % of respondents had heard of faecal egg counts (FEC), but only 17 % used the test and as few as 9 % had tested their herds for AR with faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT). The results demonstrate that there is scope for improving routines for worm control in many horse establishments in Lithuania. In order to increase knowledge and reduce the risk of the spread of AR, diagnostic methods should be adopted in a collaboration between stud farms and veterinary practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8647954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86479542021-12-20 A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania Dauparaitė, E. Kupčinskas, T. Hoglund, J. Petkevičius, S. Helminthologia Research Article Anthelmintic resistance (AR) in equine cyathostomins is being reported all over the world. In Lithuania, however, the last study on this subject was published more than fifteen years ago, thus little is known about the current situation. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that may associated with the development of AR on equine studs in Lithuania. A questionnaire containing seven open-ended and nine closed multiple-choice questions about worm control strategies, use of anthelmintic substances and stable management practices was posted to 71 randomly selected horse establishments in Lithuania. Replies were obtained from a total of 59 stables, representing 83 % of officially established stud farms in Lithuania. The results showed that more than 80 % of these establishments performed pasture management practices such as excrement removal from stables and pasture, 56 % mowed their pasture, 31 % practised mixed or rotational grazing with other species, and 97 % of the horses were routinely dewormed. Macrocyclic lactones (ML) (58 %, n=33) were the most commonly used drugs, followed by benzimidazoles (BZ) (24 %, n=14) and tetrahydropyrimidines (THP) (19 %, n=10). The majority of farms (60 %) treated horses four times per year and 68 % estimated the weight of the horses by eye before treatment. About 36 % of respondents had heard of faecal egg counts (FEC), but only 17 % used the test and as few as 9 % had tested their herds for AR with faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT). The results demonstrate that there is scope for improving routines for worm control in many horse establishments in Lithuania. In order to increase knowledge and reduce the risk of the spread of AR, diagnostic methods should be adopted in a collaboration between stud farms and veterinary practitioners. Sciendo 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8647954/ /pubmed/34934386 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/helm-2021-0031 Text en © 2021 E. Dauparaitė, T. Kupčinskas, J. Hoglund, S. Petkevičius, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dauparaitė, E.
Kupčinskas, T.
Hoglund, J.
Petkevičius, S.
A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania
title A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania
title_full A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania
title_fullStr A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania
title_short A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania
title_sort survey of control strategies for equine small strongyles in lithuania
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934386
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/helm-2021-0031
work_keys_str_mv AT dauparaitee asurveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT kupcinskast asurveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT hoglundj asurveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT petkeviciuss asurveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT dauparaitee surveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT kupcinskast surveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT hoglundj surveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania
AT petkeviciuss surveyofcontrolstrategiesforequinesmallstrongylesinlithuania