Cargando…
Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer
This article deals with the question of which unemployment benefit durations are considered fair for which groups. In addition, it examines the extent to which individuals consider longer unemployment insurance benefit durations to be appropriate in times of economic crisis, such as the current situ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11577-021-00806-3 |
_version_ | 1784610703024324608 |
---|---|
author | Osiander, Christopher Senghaas, Monika Stephan, Gesine Struck, Olaf |
author_facet | Osiander, Christopher Senghaas, Monika Stephan, Gesine Struck, Olaf |
author_sort | Osiander, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article deals with the question of which unemployment benefit durations are considered fair for which groups. In addition, it examines the extent to which individuals consider longer unemployment insurance benefit durations to be appropriate in times of economic crisis, such as the current situation during the Covid-19 pandemic. Longer reference periods can stabilize the income situation of benefit recipients and can provide time to search for an adequate job and thus increase matching quality. However, they also initially reduce the pressure to look for a job, and they lengthen the period of unemployment in the longer term. Using survey data from two online surveys done in November 2019 and during the crisis in May 2020, we examine which unemployment benefit durations employees consider appropriate. For this purpose, we presented vignettes to the survey participants describing hypothetical unemployed people whose characteristics varied randomly. The results show that the same respondents considered similar reference periods to be appropriate at both dates. In addition, the respondents took into account criteria of contribution as well as neediness when assessing the appropriate duration of benefits for the unemployed. Characteristics such as the age of the unemployed and any existing culpability, life benefits, or contribution periods influenced the duration of the benefit receipt that respondents judged to be appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8647966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86479662021-12-07 Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer Osiander, Christopher Senghaas, Monika Stephan, Gesine Struck, Olaf Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol Berichte und Diskussionen This article deals with the question of which unemployment benefit durations are considered fair for which groups. In addition, it examines the extent to which individuals consider longer unemployment insurance benefit durations to be appropriate in times of economic crisis, such as the current situation during the Covid-19 pandemic. Longer reference periods can stabilize the income situation of benefit recipients and can provide time to search for an adequate job and thus increase matching quality. However, they also initially reduce the pressure to look for a job, and they lengthen the period of unemployment in the longer term. Using survey data from two online surveys done in November 2019 and during the crisis in May 2020, we examine which unemployment benefit durations employees consider appropriate. For this purpose, we presented vignettes to the survey participants describing hypothetical unemployed people whose characteristics varied randomly. The results show that the same respondents considered similar reference periods to be appropriate at both dates. In addition, the respondents took into account criteria of contribution as well as neediness when assessing the appropriate duration of benefits for the unemployed. Characteristics such as the age of the unemployed and any existing culpability, life benefits, or contribution periods influenced the duration of the benefit receipt that respondents judged to be appropriate. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2021-12-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8647966/ /pubmed/34898722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11577-021-00806-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Berichte und Diskussionen Osiander, Christopher Senghaas, Monika Stephan, Gesine Struck, Olaf Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer |
title | Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer |
title_full | Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer |
title_fullStr | Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer |
title_full_unstemmed | Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer |
title_short | Längeres Arbeitslosengeld in der Krise? Covid-19 und die angemessene maximale Bezugsdauer |
title_sort | längeres arbeitslosengeld in der krise? covid-19 und die angemessene maximale bezugsdauer |
topic | Berichte und Diskussionen |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11577-021-00806-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osianderchristopher langeresarbeitslosengeldinderkrisecovid19unddieangemessenemaximalebezugsdauer AT senghaasmonika langeresarbeitslosengeldinderkrisecovid19unddieangemessenemaximalebezugsdauer AT stephangesine langeresarbeitslosengeldinderkrisecovid19unddieangemessenemaximalebezugsdauer AT struckolaf langeresarbeitslosengeldinderkrisecovid19unddieangemessenemaximalebezugsdauer |