Cargando…

Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons

Objective: To describe the feasibility of treating proximal ureteric and renal stones using flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) or a double approach (mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL] + fURS) without any use of radiation. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients ope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayoub, Elias M., Bourgi, Ali, Alsouki, Josee, Merhej, Sleiman, Conort, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1901357
_version_ 1784610710473408512
author Ayoub, Elias M.
Bourgi, Ali
Alsouki, Josee
Merhej, Sleiman
Conort, Pierre
author_facet Ayoub, Elias M.
Bourgi, Ali
Alsouki, Josee
Merhej, Sleiman
Conort, Pierre
author_sort Ayoub, Elias M.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To describe the feasibility of treating proximal ureteric and renal stones using flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) or a double approach (mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL] + fURS) without any use of radiation. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients operated by one surgeon for retrograde endoscopic removal of renal and ureteric lithiasis performed between June 2015 and January 2019 in our institution. Patients with anatomical complexities, high-burden stone disease (diameter >20 mm), and medical comorbidities (anti-platelet drug administration) were included in our study. Outcomes analysed included complication rate, stone-free rate (SFR, defined as no residual stone >1 mm), and repeat procedure rate. Results: In all, 183 consecutive URS for proximal ureteric and renal lithiasis were conducted. C-arm fluoroscope guidance was not required, not even in the complex cases. Simultaneous ultrasonography and fURS guidance was used in patients where the mini-PCNL approach was indicated. Lead aprons were not needed by the operating room staff in any of the operations. The SFR was 91.8% after the first procedure, with no Clavien–Dindo Grade III or IV complications. Conclusion: Our present series shows clearly that the fURS and mini-PCNL approach under fURS control is a feasible and safe technique for experienced surgeons. Patients had a high SFR and no technique-related complications, with no additional risk of X-ray exposure. However, a prospective study is required to test the reproducibility of this technique. Abbreviations: GMSV: Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia; ICRP: International Commission on Radiological Protection; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; OR: operating room; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; UAS: ureteric access sheath; (f)URS: (flexible) ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8648002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86480022021-12-07 Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons Ayoub, Elias M. Bourgi, Ali Alsouki, Josee Merhej, Sleiman Conort, Pierre Arab J Urol Stones/Endourology Objective: To describe the feasibility of treating proximal ureteric and renal stones using flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) or a double approach (mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL] + fURS) without any use of radiation. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients operated by one surgeon for retrograde endoscopic removal of renal and ureteric lithiasis performed between June 2015 and January 2019 in our institution. Patients with anatomical complexities, high-burden stone disease (diameter >20 mm), and medical comorbidities (anti-platelet drug administration) were included in our study. Outcomes analysed included complication rate, stone-free rate (SFR, defined as no residual stone >1 mm), and repeat procedure rate. Results: In all, 183 consecutive URS for proximal ureteric and renal lithiasis were conducted. C-arm fluoroscope guidance was not required, not even in the complex cases. Simultaneous ultrasonography and fURS guidance was used in patients where the mini-PCNL approach was indicated. Lead aprons were not needed by the operating room staff in any of the operations. The SFR was 91.8% after the first procedure, with no Clavien–Dindo Grade III or IV complications. Conclusion: Our present series shows clearly that the fURS and mini-PCNL approach under fURS control is a feasible and safe technique for experienced surgeons. Patients had a high SFR and no technique-related complications, with no additional risk of X-ray exposure. However, a prospective study is required to test the reproducibility of this technique. Abbreviations: GMSV: Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia; ICRP: International Commission on Radiological Protection; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; OR: operating room; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; UAS: ureteric access sheath; (f)URS: (flexible) ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography Taylor & Francis 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8648002/ /pubmed/34881057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1901357 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Stones/Endourology
Ayoub, Elias M.
Bourgi, Ali
Alsouki, Josee
Merhej, Sleiman
Conort, Pierre
Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons
title Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons
title_full Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons
title_fullStr Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons
title_short Fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: A safe technique for experienced surgeons
title_sort fluoroless endourological surgery for high burden renal and proximal ureteric stones: a safe technique for experienced surgeons
topic Stones/Endourology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1901357
work_keys_str_mv AT ayoubeliasm fluorolessendourologicalsurgeryforhighburdenrenalandproximaluretericstonesasafetechniqueforexperiencedsurgeons
AT bourgiali fluorolessendourologicalsurgeryforhighburdenrenalandproximaluretericstonesasafetechniqueforexperiencedsurgeons
AT alsoukijosee fluorolessendourologicalsurgeryforhighburdenrenalandproximaluretericstonesasafetechniqueforexperiencedsurgeons
AT merhejsleiman fluorolessendourologicalsurgeryforhighburdenrenalandproximaluretericstonesasafetechniqueforexperiencedsurgeons
AT conortpierre fluorolessendourologicalsurgeryforhighburdenrenalandproximaluretericstonesasafetechniqueforexperiencedsurgeons