Cargando…

Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis

A growing body of literature suggests that higher engagement in a range of activities can be beneficial for cognitive health in old age. Such studies typically rely on self-report questionnaires to assess level of engagement. These questionnaires are highly heterogeneous across studies, limiting gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marr, Calum, Vaportzis, Eleftheria, Niechcial, Malwina A., Dewar, Michaela, Gow, Alan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34871324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260996
_version_ 1784610734937735168
author Marr, Calum
Vaportzis, Eleftheria
Niechcial, Malwina A.
Dewar, Michaela
Gow, Alan J.
author_facet Marr, Calum
Vaportzis, Eleftheria
Niechcial, Malwina A.
Dewar, Michaela
Gow, Alan J.
author_sort Marr, Calum
collection PubMed
description A growing body of literature suggests that higher engagement in a range of activities can be beneficial for cognitive health in old age. Such studies typically rely on self-report questionnaires to assess level of engagement. These questionnaires are highly heterogeneous across studies, limiting generalisability. In particular, the most appropriate domains of activity engagement remain unclear. The Victoria Longitudinal Study-Activity Lifestyle Questionnaire comprises one of the broadest and most diverse collections of activity items, but different studies report different domain structures. This study aimed to help establish a generalisable domain structure of the Victoria Longitudinal Study-Activity Lifestyle Questionnaire. The questionnaire was adapted for use in a sample of UK-based older adults (336 community-dwelling adults aged 65–92 with no diagnosed cognitive impairment). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 29 items. The final model retained 22 of these items in a six-factor structure. Activity domains were: Manual (e.g., household repairs), Intellectual (e.g., attending a public lecture), Games (e.g., card games), Religious (e.g., attending religious services), Exercise (e.g., aerobics) and Social (e.g., going out with friends). Given that beneficial activities have the potential to be adapted into interventions, it is essential that future studies consider the most appropriate measurement of activity engagement across domains. The factor structure reported here offers a parsimonious and potentially useful way for future studies to assess engagement in different kinds of activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8648112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86481122021-12-07 Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis Marr, Calum Vaportzis, Eleftheria Niechcial, Malwina A. Dewar, Michaela Gow, Alan J. PLoS One Research Article A growing body of literature suggests that higher engagement in a range of activities can be beneficial for cognitive health in old age. Such studies typically rely on self-report questionnaires to assess level of engagement. These questionnaires are highly heterogeneous across studies, limiting generalisability. In particular, the most appropriate domains of activity engagement remain unclear. The Victoria Longitudinal Study-Activity Lifestyle Questionnaire comprises one of the broadest and most diverse collections of activity items, but different studies report different domain structures. This study aimed to help establish a generalisable domain structure of the Victoria Longitudinal Study-Activity Lifestyle Questionnaire. The questionnaire was adapted for use in a sample of UK-based older adults (336 community-dwelling adults aged 65–92 with no diagnosed cognitive impairment). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 29 items. The final model retained 22 of these items in a six-factor structure. Activity domains were: Manual (e.g., household repairs), Intellectual (e.g., attending a public lecture), Games (e.g., card games), Religious (e.g., attending religious services), Exercise (e.g., aerobics) and Social (e.g., going out with friends). Given that beneficial activities have the potential to be adapted into interventions, it is essential that future studies consider the most appropriate measurement of activity engagement across domains. The factor structure reported here offers a parsimonious and potentially useful way for future studies to assess engagement in different kinds of activities. Public Library of Science 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8648112/ /pubmed/34871324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260996 Text en © 2021 Marr et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marr, Calum
Vaportzis, Eleftheria
Niechcial, Malwina A.
Dewar, Michaela
Gow, Alan J.
Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis
title Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis
title_full Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis
title_fullStr Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis
title_short Measuring activity engagement in old age: An exploratory factor analysis
title_sort measuring activity engagement in old age: an exploratory factor analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34871324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260996
work_keys_str_mv AT marrcalum measuringactivityengagementinoldageanexploratoryfactoranalysis
AT vaportziseleftheria measuringactivityengagementinoldageanexploratoryfactoranalysis
AT niechcialmalwinaa measuringactivityengagementinoldageanexploratoryfactoranalysis
AT dewarmichaela measuringactivityengagementinoldageanexploratoryfactoranalysis
AT gowalanj measuringactivityengagementinoldageanexploratoryfactoranalysis