Cargando…

MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed

The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Komori, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648161/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab159.066
_version_ 1784610746164838400
author Komori, Takashi
author_facet Komori, Takashi
author_sort Komori, Takashi
collection PubMed
description The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wildtype astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wildtype astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wildtype astrocytoma respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. For diffuse gliomas in children, molecular alteration-based classification was adopted, dividing low-grade and high-grade subcategories. New tumor types and subtypes were introduced, some based on DNA methylation profiling. To achieve this novel classification in a resource-limited setting, an integrated diagnosis combining clinical, histological, and molecular information became more important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8648161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86481612021-12-07 MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed Komori, Takashi Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wildtype astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wildtype astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wildtype astrocytoma respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. For diffuse gliomas in children, molecular alteration-based classification was adopted, dividing low-grade and high-grade subcategories. New tumor types and subtypes were introduced, some based on DNA methylation profiling. To achieve this novel classification in a resource-limited setting, an integrated diagnosis combining clinical, histological, and molecular information became more important. Oxford University Press 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8648161/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab159.066 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Abstracts
Komori, Takashi
MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed
title MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed
title_full MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed
title_fullStr MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed
title_full_unstemmed MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed
title_short MPC-17 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the CNS, 5th ed
title_sort mpc-17 2021 who classification of tumors of the cns, 5th ed
topic Supplement Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648161/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab159.066
work_keys_str_mv AT komoritakashi mpc172021whoclassificationoftumorsofthecns5thed