Anti-VEGF-Therapie bei fibrovaskulärer und serös-vaskularisierter Pigmentepithelabhebung bei neovaskulärer AMD: Eine retrospektive Fünf-Jahres-Analyse

BACKGROUND: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the most frequent cause of pigment epithelial detachment (PED). In the clinical routine the treatment of fibrovascular PED (fPED) and serous vascularized PED (svPED) with intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors has a restricted prognosis. OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on the long-term outcome of PED under anti-VEGF therapy. Therefore, this study recorded the course of treated PEDs in nAMD eyes over a period of 5 years. METHODS: All eyes with fPED or svPED that underwent anti-VEGF medication between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed regarding the clinical course and the morphology seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT). The inclusion criteria were the detection of a PED on OCT, the angiographic verification of nAMD, a documented clinical history over 5 years and a good image quality. RESULTS: A total of 23 eyes from 22 patients met the inclusion criteria. After 5 years a significant deterioration of visual acuity (VA) was seen in all eyes (p = 0.007) and in the subgroup of cases with fPED (p = 0.045). In the eyes with svPED the decline of VA was not significant (p = 0.097). In the collective study group a statistically significant reduction of PED height (p = 0.006) and an increase of PED diameter was measured (p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis the decrease of PED height and increase of PED diameter were significant for cases with svPED (p = 0.004, p = 0.013, respectively) but were not statistically significant for fPED eyes (height: p = 0.616; diameter: p = 0.097). In 17 (74%) eyes fibrosis or atrophy were seen on the final assessment of OCT images. DISCUSSION: After 5 years of anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD-associated PED the VA declined in half of the eyes and the OCT showed an unfavorable morphology in 3/4 of the cases. The average number of visits and injections was distinctly lower than in clinical trials and other real-life analyses. In summary, we observed an undertreatment with a worse functional and anatomical outcome in our clinical routine compared to other studies.