Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiological factors predicting worse outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with a focus on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 67 OPSCC patients, treated with (C)RT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sistonen, Heli J., Aro, Katri, Atula, Timo, Jouhi, Lauri, Lindén, Riikka, Tapiovaara, Laura, Loimu, Venla, Markkola, Antti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33877396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01014-4
_version_ 1784610849356251136
author Sistonen, Heli J.
Aro, Katri
Atula, Timo
Jouhi, Lauri
Lindén, Riikka
Tapiovaara, Laura
Loimu, Venla
Markkola, Antti
author_facet Sistonen, Heli J.
Aro, Katri
Atula, Timo
Jouhi, Lauri
Lindén, Riikka
Tapiovaara, Laura
Loimu, Venla
Markkola, Antti
author_sort Sistonen, Heli J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiological factors predicting worse outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with a focus on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 67 OPSCC patients, treated with (C)RT with curative intent and diagnosed during 2013–2017. Human papilloma virus (HPV) association was detected with p16 immunohistochemistry. Of all 67 tumors, 55 were p16 positive, 9 were p16 negative, and in 3 the p16 status was unknown. Median follow-up time was 38 months. We analyzed pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for factors predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR), including primary tumor volume and the largest metastasis. Crude and p16-adjusted hazard ratios were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: Disease recurred in 13 (19.4%) patients. High ADC predicted poor DFS, but not when the analysis was adjusted for p16. A break in RT (hazard ratio, HR = 3.972, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.445–10.917, p = 0.007) and larger metastasis volume (HR = 1.041, 95% CI 1.007–1.077, p = 0.019) were associated with worse DFS. A primary tumor larger than 7 cm(3) was associated with increased LRR rate (HR = 4.861, 1.042–22.667, p = 0.044). Among p16-positive tumors, mean ADC was lower in grade 3 tumors compared to lower grade tumors (0.736 vs. 0.883; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Low tumor ADC seems to be related to p16 positivity and therefore should not be used independently to evaluate disease prognosis or to choose patients for treatment deintensification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8648632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86486322021-12-08 Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Sistonen, Heli J. Aro, Katri Atula, Timo Jouhi, Lauri Lindén, Riikka Tapiovaara, Laura Loimu, Venla Markkola, Antti Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiological factors predicting worse outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with a focus on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 67 OPSCC patients, treated with (C)RT with curative intent and diagnosed during 2013–2017. Human papilloma virus (HPV) association was detected with p16 immunohistochemistry. Of all 67 tumors, 55 were p16 positive, 9 were p16 negative, and in 3 the p16 status was unknown. Median follow-up time was 38 months. We analyzed pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for factors predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR), including primary tumor volume and the largest metastasis. Crude and p16-adjusted hazard ratios were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: Disease recurred in 13 (19.4%) patients. High ADC predicted poor DFS, but not when the analysis was adjusted for p16. A break in RT (hazard ratio, HR = 3.972, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.445–10.917, p = 0.007) and larger metastasis volume (HR = 1.041, 95% CI 1.007–1.077, p = 0.019) were associated with worse DFS. A primary tumor larger than 7 cm(3) was associated with increased LRR rate (HR = 4.861, 1.042–22.667, p = 0.044). Among p16-positive tumors, mean ADC was lower in grade 3 tumors compared to lower grade tumors (0.736 vs. 0.883; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Low tumor ADC seems to be related to p16 positivity and therefore should not be used independently to evaluate disease prognosis or to choose patients for treatment deintensification. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8648632/ /pubmed/33877396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01014-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sistonen, Heli J.
Aro, Katri
Atula, Timo
Jouhi, Lauri
Lindén, Riikka
Tapiovaara, Laura
Loimu, Venla
Markkola, Antti
Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
title Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
title_full Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
title_short Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
title_sort prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in oropharyngeal carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33877396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01014-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sistonenhelij prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT arokatri prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT atulatimo prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT jouhilauri prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT lindenriikka prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT tapiovaaralaura prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT loimuvenla prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma
AT markkolaantti prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinoropharyngealcarcinoma