Cargando…

Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2

BACKGROUND: Even though treatment guidelines recommend botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) as first line treatment for primary cervical dystonia (CD), there are only limited data on how BoNT-A-injections are administered in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This subgroup analysis evaluated patient s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ip, Chi Wang, Schramm, Axel, Maisonobe, Pascal, Zaragatski, Emma, Sycha, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01120-1
_version_ 1784610851109470208
author Ip, Chi Wang
Schramm, Axel
Maisonobe, Pascal
Zaragatski, Emma
Sycha, Thomas
author_facet Ip, Chi Wang
Schramm, Axel
Maisonobe, Pascal
Zaragatski, Emma
Sycha, Thomas
author_sort Ip, Chi Wang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even though treatment guidelines recommend botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) as first line treatment for primary cervical dystonia (CD), there are only limited data on how BoNT-A-injections are administered in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This subgroup analysis evaluated patient satisfaction and symptom control under consideration of BoNT‑A treatment modalities in German and Austrian CD patients (DE/AT, n = 79) compared to the full international cohort (n = 995). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The INTEREST-IN-CD2 was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study. Course of treatment in adult primary CD patients under BoNT‑A treatment was assessed over a time period of 3 years. Primary outcome measure was the long-term satisfaction of patients with treatment, measured as maximum satisfaction between two consecutive injections as well as satisfaction at the time of reinjection. RESULTS: Treatment satisfaction at the maximum effect was stable and comparably good in both populations during the study (82.3–92.7% and 85.0–89.9%). Satisfaction decreased with decreasing BoNT‑A effect at the end of the treatment interval: it was comparable at the start of the study in both groups (54.2% vs. 51.4%), decreased numerically in the DE/AT group to 32.7% but remained stable in the total population. Analysis of Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and Tsui scores did not reveal any substantial differences between the DE/AT subgroup and total cohort. CONCLUSION: Overall, the study confirmed good clinical symptom control by BoNT‑A. The numerical differences in the current satisfaction seen in the comparison of DE/AT to the total cohort are possibly due to different proportions of BoNT‑A naïve patients in both groups, as they expressed different levels of satisfaction than previously treated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8648643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86486432021-12-08 Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2 Ip, Chi Wang Schramm, Axel Maisonobe, Pascal Zaragatski, Emma Sycha, Thomas Nervenarzt Originalien BACKGROUND: Even though treatment guidelines recommend botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) as first line treatment for primary cervical dystonia (CD), there are only limited data on how BoNT-A-injections are administered in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This subgroup analysis evaluated patient satisfaction and symptom control under consideration of BoNT‑A treatment modalities in German and Austrian CD patients (DE/AT, n = 79) compared to the full international cohort (n = 995). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The INTEREST-IN-CD2 was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study. Course of treatment in adult primary CD patients under BoNT‑A treatment was assessed over a time period of 3 years. Primary outcome measure was the long-term satisfaction of patients with treatment, measured as maximum satisfaction between two consecutive injections as well as satisfaction at the time of reinjection. RESULTS: Treatment satisfaction at the maximum effect was stable and comparably good in both populations during the study (82.3–92.7% and 85.0–89.9%). Satisfaction decreased with decreasing BoNT‑A effect at the end of the treatment interval: it was comparable at the start of the study in both groups (54.2% vs. 51.4%), decreased numerically in the DE/AT group to 32.7% but remained stable in the total population. Analysis of Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and Tsui scores did not reveal any substantial differences between the DE/AT subgroup and total cohort. CONCLUSION: Overall, the study confirmed good clinical symptom control by BoNT‑A. The numerical differences in the current satisfaction seen in the comparison of DE/AT to the total cohort are possibly due to different proportions of BoNT‑A naïve patients in both groups, as they expressed different levels of satisfaction than previously treated patients. Springer Medizin 2021-05-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8648643/ /pubmed/33942135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01120-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Ip, Chi Wang
Schramm, Axel
Maisonobe, Pascal
Zaragatski, Emma
Sycha, Thomas
Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2
title Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2
title_full Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2
title_fullStr Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2
title_full_unstemmed Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2
title_short Behandlungszufriedenheit bei Patienten mit zervikaler Dystonie: Subgruppenanalyse von INTEREST-IN-CD-2
title_sort behandlungszufriedenheit bei patienten mit zervikaler dystonie: subgruppenanalyse von interest-in-cd-2
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01120-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ipchiwang behandlungszufriedenheitbeipatientenmitzervikalerdystoniesubgruppenanalysevoninterestincd2
AT schrammaxel behandlungszufriedenheitbeipatientenmitzervikalerdystoniesubgruppenanalysevoninterestincd2
AT maisonobepascal behandlungszufriedenheitbeipatientenmitzervikalerdystoniesubgruppenanalysevoninterestincd2
AT zaragatskiemma behandlungszufriedenheitbeipatientenmitzervikalerdystoniesubgruppenanalysevoninterestincd2
AT sychathomas behandlungszufriedenheitbeipatientenmitzervikalerdystoniesubgruppenanalysevoninterestincd2