Cargando…

Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butt, Jawad H., Kofoed, Klaus F., Kelbæk, Henning, Hansen, Peter R., Torp‐Pedersen, Christian, Høfsten, Dan, Holmvang, Lene, Pedersen, Frants, Bang, Lia E., Sigvardsen, Per E., Clemmensen, Peter, Linde, Jesper J., Heitmann, Merete, Hove, Jens Dahlgaard, Abdulla, Jawdat, Gislason, Gunnar, Engstrøm, Thomas, Køber, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022333
_version_ 1784610929562877952
author Butt, Jawad H.
Kofoed, Klaus F.
Kelbæk, Henning
Hansen, Peter R.
Torp‐Pedersen, Christian
Høfsten, Dan
Holmvang, Lene
Pedersen, Frants
Bang, Lia E.
Sigvardsen, Per E.
Clemmensen, Peter
Linde, Jesper J.
Heitmann, Merete
Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
Abdulla, Jawdat
Gislason, Gunnar
Engstrøm, Thomas
Køber, Lars
author_facet Butt, Jawad H.
Kofoed, Klaus F.
Kelbæk, Henning
Hansen, Peter R.
Torp‐Pedersen, Christian
Høfsten, Dan
Holmvang, Lene
Pedersen, Frants
Bang, Lia E.
Sigvardsen, Per E.
Clemmensen, Peter
Linde, Jesper J.
Heitmann, Merete
Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
Abdulla, Jawdat
Gislason, Gunnar
Engstrøm, Thomas
Køber, Lars
author_sort Butt, Jawad H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all‐cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all‐cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) (P (interaction)=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high‐risk and low‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02061891.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8649124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86491242022-03-21 Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial Butt, Jawad H. Kofoed, Klaus F. Kelbæk, Henning Hansen, Peter R. Torp‐Pedersen, Christian Høfsten, Dan Holmvang, Lene Pedersen, Frants Bang, Lia E. Sigvardsen, Per E. Clemmensen, Peter Linde, Jesper J. Heitmann, Merete Hove, Jens Dahlgaard Abdulla, Jawdat Gislason, Gunnar Engstrøm, Thomas Køber, Lars J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all‐cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all‐cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) (P (interaction)=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high‐risk and low‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02061891. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8649124/ /pubmed/34585591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022333 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Butt, Jawad H.
Kofoed, Klaus F.
Kelbæk, Henning
Hansen, Peter R.
Torp‐Pedersen, Christian
Høfsten, Dan
Holmvang, Lene
Pedersen, Frants
Bang, Lia E.
Sigvardsen, Per E.
Clemmensen, Peter
Linde, Jesper J.
Heitmann, Merete
Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
Abdulla, Jawdat
Gislason, Gunnar
Engstrøm, Thomas
Køber, Lars
Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
title Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
title_full Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
title_fullStr Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
title_full_unstemmed Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
title_short Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
title_sort importance of risk assessment in timing of invasive coronary evaluation and treatment of patients with non–st‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome: insights from the verdict trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022333
work_keys_str_mv AT buttjawadh importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT kofoedklausf importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT kelbækhenning importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT hansenpeterr importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT torppedersenchristian importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT høfstendan importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT holmvanglene importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT pedersenfrants importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT bangliae importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT sigvardsenpere importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT clemmensenpeter importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT lindejesperj importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT heitmannmerete importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT hovejensdahlgaard importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT abdullajawdat importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT gislasongunnar importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT engstrømthomas importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial
AT køberlars importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial