Cargando…
Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022333 |
_version_ | 1784610929562877952 |
---|---|
author | Butt, Jawad H. Kofoed, Klaus F. Kelbæk, Henning Hansen, Peter R. Torp‐Pedersen, Christian Høfsten, Dan Holmvang, Lene Pedersen, Frants Bang, Lia E. Sigvardsen, Per E. Clemmensen, Peter Linde, Jesper J. Heitmann, Merete Hove, Jens Dahlgaard Abdulla, Jawdat Gislason, Gunnar Engstrøm, Thomas Køber, Lars |
author_facet | Butt, Jawad H. Kofoed, Klaus F. Kelbæk, Henning Hansen, Peter R. Torp‐Pedersen, Christian Høfsten, Dan Holmvang, Lene Pedersen, Frants Bang, Lia E. Sigvardsen, Per E. Clemmensen, Peter Linde, Jesper J. Heitmann, Merete Hove, Jens Dahlgaard Abdulla, Jawdat Gislason, Gunnar Engstrøm, Thomas Køber, Lars |
author_sort | Butt, Jawad H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all‐cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all‐cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) (P (interaction)=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high‐risk and low‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02061891. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8649124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86491242022-03-21 Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial Butt, Jawad H. Kofoed, Klaus F. Kelbæk, Henning Hansen, Peter R. Torp‐Pedersen, Christian Høfsten, Dan Holmvang, Lene Pedersen, Frants Bang, Lia E. Sigvardsen, Per E. Clemmensen, Peter Linde, Jesper J. Heitmann, Merete Hove, Jens Dahlgaard Abdulla, Jawdat Gislason, Gunnar Engstrøm, Thomas Køber, Lars J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive examination and treatment of high‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome has not been established. We investigated the efficacy of early invasive coronary angiography compared with standard‐care invasive coronary angiography on the risk of all‐cause mortality according to the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score in a predefined subgroup analysis of the VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with clinical suspicion of non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome with ECG changes indicating new ischemia and/or elevated troponin, in whom invasive coronary angiography was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an early (≤12 hours) or standard (48–72 hours) invasive strategy. The primary outcome of the present study was all‐cause mortality. Of 2147 patients randomized in the VERDICT trial, 2092 patients had an available GRACE risk score. Of these, 1021 (48.8%) patients had a GRACE score >140. During a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 192 (18.8%) and 54 (5.0%) patients died in the high and low GRACE score groups, respectively. The risk of death with the early invasive strategy was increased in patients with a GRACE score ≤140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.16–3.59]), whereas there was a trend toward a decreased risk of death with the early invasive strategy in patients with a GRACE score >140 (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63–1.10]) (P (interaction)=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, we found a significant interaction between timing of invasive coronary angiography and GRACE score on the risk of death. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety among high‐risk and low‐risk patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02061891. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8649124/ /pubmed/34585591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022333 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Butt, Jawad H. Kofoed, Klaus F. Kelbæk, Henning Hansen, Peter R. Torp‐Pedersen, Christian Høfsten, Dan Holmvang, Lene Pedersen, Frants Bang, Lia E. Sigvardsen, Per E. Clemmensen, Peter Linde, Jesper J. Heitmann, Merete Hove, Jens Dahlgaard Abdulla, Jawdat Gislason, Gunnar Engstrøm, Thomas Køber, Lars Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial |
title | Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial |
title_full | Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial |
title_fullStr | Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial |
title_short | Importance of Risk Assessment in Timing of Invasive Coronary Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the VERDICT Trial |
title_sort | importance of risk assessment in timing of invasive coronary evaluation and treatment of patients with non–st‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome: insights from the verdict trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buttjawadh importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT kofoedklausf importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT kelbækhenning importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT hansenpeterr importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT torppedersenchristian importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT høfstendan importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT holmvanglene importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT pedersenfrants importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT bangliae importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT sigvardsenpere importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT clemmensenpeter importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT lindejesperj importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT heitmannmerete importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT hovejensdahlgaard importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT abdullajawdat importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT gislasongunnar importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT engstrømthomas importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial AT køberlars importanceofriskassessmentintimingofinvasivecoronaryevaluationandtreatmentofpatientswithnonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndromeinsightsfromtheverdicttrial |