Cargando…

Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram is currently the standard preprocedural imaging for left atrial appendage occlusion. This study aimed to assess the additive value of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram imaging guidance to left...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: So, Chak‐yu, Kang, Guson, Villablanca, Pedro A., Ignatius, Abel, Asghar, Saleha, Dhillon, Dilshan, Lee, James C., Khan, Arfaat, Singh, Gurjit, Frisoli, Tiberio M., O’Neill, Brian P., Eng, Marvin H., Song, Thomas, Pantelic, Milan, O’Neill, William W., Wang, Dee Dee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020615
_version_ 1784610962950586368
author So, Chak‐yu
Kang, Guson
Villablanca, Pedro A.
Ignatius, Abel
Asghar, Saleha
Dhillon, Dilshan
Lee, James C.
Khan, Arfaat
Singh, Gurjit
Frisoli, Tiberio M.
O’Neill, Brian P.
Eng, Marvin H.
Song, Thomas
Pantelic, Milan
O’Neill, William W.
Wang, Dee Dee
author_facet So, Chak‐yu
Kang, Guson
Villablanca, Pedro A.
Ignatius, Abel
Asghar, Saleha
Dhillon, Dilshan
Lee, James C.
Khan, Arfaat
Singh, Gurjit
Frisoli, Tiberio M.
O’Neill, Brian P.
Eng, Marvin H.
Song, Thomas
Pantelic, Milan
O’Neill, William W.
Wang, Dee Dee
author_sort So, Chak‐yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram is currently the standard preprocedural imaging for left atrial appendage occlusion. This study aimed to assess the additive value of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram imaging guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 485 Watchman implantations at a single center to compare the outcomes of using additional CT preprocedural planning (n=328, 67.6%) versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance (n=157, 32.4%) for left atrial appendage occlusion. The primary end point was the rate of successful device implantation without major peri‐device leak (>5 mm). Secondary end points included major adverse events, total procedural time, delivery sheath and devices used, risk of major peri‐device leak and device‐related thrombus at follow‐up imaging. A single/anterior‐curve delivery sheath was used more commonly in those who underwent CT imaging (35.9% versus 18.8%; P<0.001). Additional preprocedural CT planning was associated with a significantly higher successful device implantation rate (98.5% versus 94.9%; P=0.02), a shorter procedural time (median, 45.5 minutes versus 51.0 minutes; P=0.03) and a less frequent change of device size (5.6% versus 12.1%; P=0.01), particularly device upsize (4% versus 9.4%; P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of major adverse events (2.1% versus 1.9%; P=0.87). Only 1 significant peri‐device leak (0.2%) and 5 device‐related thrombi were detected in follow‐up (1.2%) with no intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: Additional preprocedural planning using CT in Watchman implantation was associated with a higher successful device implantation rate, a shorter total procedural time, and a less frequent change of device sizes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8649286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86492862022-01-14 Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice So, Chak‐yu Kang, Guson Villablanca, Pedro A. Ignatius, Abel Asghar, Saleha Dhillon, Dilshan Lee, James C. Khan, Arfaat Singh, Gurjit Frisoli, Tiberio M. O’Neill, Brian P. Eng, Marvin H. Song, Thomas Pantelic, Milan O’Neill, William W. Wang, Dee Dee J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram is currently the standard preprocedural imaging for left atrial appendage occlusion. This study aimed to assess the additive value of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram imaging guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 485 Watchman implantations at a single center to compare the outcomes of using additional CT preprocedural planning (n=328, 67.6%) versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance (n=157, 32.4%) for left atrial appendage occlusion. The primary end point was the rate of successful device implantation without major peri‐device leak (>5 mm). Secondary end points included major adverse events, total procedural time, delivery sheath and devices used, risk of major peri‐device leak and device‐related thrombus at follow‐up imaging. A single/anterior‐curve delivery sheath was used more commonly in those who underwent CT imaging (35.9% versus 18.8%; P<0.001). Additional preprocedural CT planning was associated with a significantly higher successful device implantation rate (98.5% versus 94.9%; P=0.02), a shorter procedural time (median, 45.5 minutes versus 51.0 minutes; P=0.03) and a less frequent change of device size (5.6% versus 12.1%; P=0.01), particularly device upsize (4% versus 9.4%; P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of major adverse events (2.1% versus 1.9%; P=0.87). Only 1 significant peri‐device leak (0.2%) and 5 device‐related thrombi were detected in follow‐up (1.2%) with no intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: Additional preprocedural planning using CT in Watchman implantation was associated with a higher successful device implantation rate, a shorter total procedural time, and a less frequent change of device sizes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8649286/ /pubmed/34398676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020615 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
So, Chak‐yu
Kang, Guson
Villablanca, Pedro A.
Ignatius, Abel
Asghar, Saleha
Dhillon, Dilshan
Lee, James C.
Khan, Arfaat
Singh, Gurjit
Frisoli, Tiberio M.
O’Neill, Brian P.
Eng, Marvin H.
Song, Thomas
Pantelic, Milan
O’Neill, William W.
Wang, Dee Dee
Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
title Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
title_full Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
title_fullStr Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
title_full_unstemmed Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
title_short Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
title_sort additive value of preprocedural computed tomography planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion: comparison of real‐world practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020615
work_keys_str_mv AT sochakyu additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT kangguson additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT villablancapedroa additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT ignatiusabel additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT asgharsaleha additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT dhillondilshan additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT leejamesc additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT khanarfaat additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT singhgurjit additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT frisolitiberiom additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT oneillbrianp additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT engmarvinh additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT songthomas additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT pantelicmilan additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT oneillwilliamw additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice
AT wangdeedee additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice