Cargando…
Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram is currently the standard preprocedural imaging for left atrial appendage occlusion. This study aimed to assess the additive value of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram imaging guidance to left...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020615 |
_version_ | 1784610962950586368 |
---|---|
author | So, Chak‐yu Kang, Guson Villablanca, Pedro A. Ignatius, Abel Asghar, Saleha Dhillon, Dilshan Lee, James C. Khan, Arfaat Singh, Gurjit Frisoli, Tiberio M. O’Neill, Brian P. Eng, Marvin H. Song, Thomas Pantelic, Milan O’Neill, William W. Wang, Dee Dee |
author_facet | So, Chak‐yu Kang, Guson Villablanca, Pedro A. Ignatius, Abel Asghar, Saleha Dhillon, Dilshan Lee, James C. Khan, Arfaat Singh, Gurjit Frisoli, Tiberio M. O’Neill, Brian P. Eng, Marvin H. Song, Thomas Pantelic, Milan O’Neill, William W. Wang, Dee Dee |
author_sort | So, Chak‐yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram is currently the standard preprocedural imaging for left atrial appendage occlusion. This study aimed to assess the additive value of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram imaging guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 485 Watchman implantations at a single center to compare the outcomes of using additional CT preprocedural planning (n=328, 67.6%) versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance (n=157, 32.4%) for left atrial appendage occlusion. The primary end point was the rate of successful device implantation without major peri‐device leak (>5 mm). Secondary end points included major adverse events, total procedural time, delivery sheath and devices used, risk of major peri‐device leak and device‐related thrombus at follow‐up imaging. A single/anterior‐curve delivery sheath was used more commonly in those who underwent CT imaging (35.9% versus 18.8%; P<0.001). Additional preprocedural CT planning was associated with a significantly higher successful device implantation rate (98.5% versus 94.9%; P=0.02), a shorter procedural time (median, 45.5 minutes versus 51.0 minutes; P=0.03) and a less frequent change of device size (5.6% versus 12.1%; P=0.01), particularly device upsize (4% versus 9.4%; P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of major adverse events (2.1% versus 1.9%; P=0.87). Only 1 significant peri‐device leak (0.2%) and 5 device‐related thrombi were detected in follow‐up (1.2%) with no intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: Additional preprocedural planning using CT in Watchman implantation was associated with a higher successful device implantation rate, a shorter total procedural time, and a less frequent change of device sizes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8649286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86492862022-01-14 Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice So, Chak‐yu Kang, Guson Villablanca, Pedro A. Ignatius, Abel Asghar, Saleha Dhillon, Dilshan Lee, James C. Khan, Arfaat Singh, Gurjit Frisoli, Tiberio M. O’Neill, Brian P. Eng, Marvin H. Song, Thomas Pantelic, Milan O’Neill, William W. Wang, Dee Dee J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiogram is currently the standard preprocedural imaging for left atrial appendage occlusion. This study aimed to assess the additive value of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram imaging guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 485 Watchman implantations at a single center to compare the outcomes of using additional CT preprocedural planning (n=328, 67.6%) versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance (n=157, 32.4%) for left atrial appendage occlusion. The primary end point was the rate of successful device implantation without major peri‐device leak (>5 mm). Secondary end points included major adverse events, total procedural time, delivery sheath and devices used, risk of major peri‐device leak and device‐related thrombus at follow‐up imaging. A single/anterior‐curve delivery sheath was used more commonly in those who underwent CT imaging (35.9% versus 18.8%; P<0.001). Additional preprocedural CT planning was associated with a significantly higher successful device implantation rate (98.5% versus 94.9%; P=0.02), a shorter procedural time (median, 45.5 minutes versus 51.0 minutes; P=0.03) and a less frequent change of device size (5.6% versus 12.1%; P=0.01), particularly device upsize (4% versus 9.4%; P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of major adverse events (2.1% versus 1.9%; P=0.87). Only 1 significant peri‐device leak (0.2%) and 5 device‐related thrombi were detected in follow‐up (1.2%) with no intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: Additional preprocedural planning using CT in Watchman implantation was associated with a higher successful device implantation rate, a shorter total procedural time, and a less frequent change of device sizes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8649286/ /pubmed/34398676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020615 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research So, Chak‐yu Kang, Guson Villablanca, Pedro A. Ignatius, Abel Asghar, Saleha Dhillon, Dilshan Lee, James C. Khan, Arfaat Singh, Gurjit Frisoli, Tiberio M. O’Neill, Brian P. Eng, Marvin H. Song, Thomas Pantelic, Milan O’Neill, William W. Wang, Dee Dee Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice |
title | Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice |
title_full | Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice |
title_fullStr | Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice |
title_short | Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand‐Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real‐World Practice |
title_sort | additive value of preprocedural computed tomography planning versus stand‐alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion: comparison of real‐world practice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sochakyu additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT kangguson additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT villablancapedroa additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT ignatiusabel additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT asgharsaleha additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT dhillondilshan additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT leejamesc additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT khanarfaat additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT singhgurjit additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT frisolitiberiom additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT oneillbrianp additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT engmarvinh additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT songthomas additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT pantelicmilan additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT oneillwilliamw additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice AT wangdeedee additivevalueofpreproceduralcomputedtomographyplanningversusstandalonetransesophagealechocardiogramguidancetoleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparisonofrealworldpractice |