Cargando…

Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of two immunoassays for diagnosis of Graves’ disease (GD), the Immulite thyroid‐stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI), and Elecsys Anti‐TSH receptor (TSHR) assay. METHODS: Precision and analytical measurement range were assessed using pooled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Yao, Ni, Jiajin, Cen, Yi, Zhang, Buyue, Wu, Wenqing, Cheng, Wei, Huang, Mingying, Guan, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23950
_version_ 1784610977497481216
author Hu, Yao
Ni, Jiajin
Cen, Yi
Zhang, Buyue
Wu, Wenqing
Cheng, Wei
Huang, Mingying
Guan, Ming
author_facet Hu, Yao
Ni, Jiajin
Cen, Yi
Zhang, Buyue
Wu, Wenqing
Cheng, Wei
Huang, Mingying
Guan, Ming
author_sort Hu, Yao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of two immunoassays for diagnosis of Graves’ disease (GD), the Immulite thyroid‐stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI), and Elecsys Anti‐TSH receptor (TSHR) assay. METHODS: Precision and analytical measurement range were assessed using pooled samples of patients. The comparison between the two methods was evaluated using 579 clinical samples, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn using the final diagnosis as reference. Clinical sensitivity and specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the two tests. RESULTS: The repeatability and intermediate imprecision coefficient of variation (CV%) of the TSI assay were 3.8% and 4.1% at 0.95 IU/L, and 3.5% and3.6% at 19.5 IU/L, respectively. The assays were linear over a range 0.27–38.5 IU/L. There was a high correlation between the quantitative results of the two methods (correlation coefficient r = 0.930). The cut‐off value obtained by ROC analysis for TSI assay was 0.7 IU/L with sensitivity of 93.7% and specificity of 85.1%. An overall qualitative agreement of 91.5% between two methods was observed. Among 44 patients with discordant qualitative results, the TSI assay provided more satisfactory results consistent with clinical diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The TSI assay showed excellent analytical performance and provided a high PPV for GD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8649345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86493452021-12-28 Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease Hu, Yao Ni, Jiajin Cen, Yi Zhang, Buyue Wu, Wenqing Cheng, Wei Huang, Mingying Guan, Ming J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of two immunoassays for diagnosis of Graves’ disease (GD), the Immulite thyroid‐stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI), and Elecsys Anti‐TSH receptor (TSHR) assay. METHODS: Precision and analytical measurement range were assessed using pooled samples of patients. The comparison between the two methods was evaluated using 579 clinical samples, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn using the final diagnosis as reference. Clinical sensitivity and specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the two tests. RESULTS: The repeatability and intermediate imprecision coefficient of variation (CV%) of the TSI assay were 3.8% and 4.1% at 0.95 IU/L, and 3.5% and3.6% at 19.5 IU/L, respectively. The assays were linear over a range 0.27–38.5 IU/L. There was a high correlation between the quantitative results of the two methods (correlation coefficient r = 0.930). The cut‐off value obtained by ROC analysis for TSI assay was 0.7 IU/L with sensitivity of 93.7% and specificity of 85.1%. An overall qualitative agreement of 91.5% between two methods was observed. Among 44 patients with discordant qualitative results, the TSI assay provided more satisfactory results consistent with clinical diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The TSI assay showed excellent analytical performance and provided a high PPV for GD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8649345/ /pubmed/34752648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23950 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hu, Yao
Ni, Jiajin
Cen, Yi
Zhang, Buyue
Wu, Wenqing
Cheng, Wei
Huang, Mingying
Guan, Ming
Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease
title Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease
title_full Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease
title_fullStr Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease
title_short Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease
title_sort evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid‐stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of graves’ disease
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23950
work_keys_str_mv AT huyao evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT nijiajin evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT cenyi evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT zhangbuyue evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT wuwenqing evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT chengwei evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT huangmingying evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease
AT guanming evaluationofanalyticandclinicalperformanceoftwoimmunoassaysfordetectingthyroidstimulatingreceptorantibodyinthediagnosisofgravesdisease