Cargando…
Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit analysis
OBJECTIVE: To offer a quantitative risk–benefit analysis of two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among adolescents in England. SETTING: England. DESIGN: Following the risk–benefit analysis methodology carried out by the US Centers for Disease Control, we calculated historical rates of hospital admiss...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01410768211052589 |
_version_ | 1784611005192470528 |
---|---|
author | Gurdasani, Deepti Bhatt, Samir Costello, Anthony Denaxas, Spiros Flaxman, Seth Greenhalgh, Trisha Griffin, Stephen Hyde, Zoë Katzourakis, Aris McKee, Martin Michie, Susan Ratmann, Oliver Reicher, Stephen Scally, Gabriel Tomlinson, Christopher Yates, Christian Ziauddeen, Hisham Pagel, Christina |
author_facet | Gurdasani, Deepti Bhatt, Samir Costello, Anthony Denaxas, Spiros Flaxman, Seth Greenhalgh, Trisha Griffin, Stephen Hyde, Zoë Katzourakis, Aris McKee, Martin Michie, Susan Ratmann, Oliver Reicher, Stephen Scally, Gabriel Tomlinson, Christopher Yates, Christian Ziauddeen, Hisham Pagel, Christina |
author_sort | Gurdasani, Deepti |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To offer a quantitative risk–benefit analysis of two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among adolescents in England. SETTING: England. DESIGN: Following the risk–benefit analysis methodology carried out by the US Centers for Disease Control, we calculated historical rates of hospital admission, Intensive Care Unit admission and death for ascertained SARS-CoV-2 cases in children aged 12–17 in England. We then used these rates alongside a range of estimates for incidence of long COVID, vaccine efficacy and vaccine-induced myocarditis, to estimate hospital and Intensive Care Unit admissions, deaths and cases of long COVID over a period of 16 weeks under assumptions of high and low case incidence. PARTICIPANTS: All 12–17 year olds with a record of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in England between 1 July 2020 and 31 March 2021 using national linked electronic health records, accessed through the British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalisations, Intensive Care Unit admissions, deaths and cases of long COVID averted by vaccinating all 12–17 year olds in England over a 16-week period under different estimates of future case incidence. RESULTS: At high future case incidence of 1000/100,000 population/week over 16 weeks, vaccination could avert 4430 hospital admissions and 36 deaths over 16 weeks. At the low incidence of 50/100,000/week, vaccination could avert 70 hospital admissions and two deaths over 16 weeks. The benefit of vaccination in terms of hospitalisations in adolescents outweighs risks unless case rates are sustainably very low (below 30/100,000 teenagers/week). Benefit of vaccination exists at any case rate for the outcomes of death and long COVID, since neither have been associated with vaccination to date. CONCLUSIONS: Given the current (as at 15 September 2021) high case rates (680/100,000 population/week in 10–19 year olds) in England, our findings support vaccination of adolescents against SARS-CoV2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8649477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86494772021-12-08 Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit analysis Gurdasani, Deepti Bhatt, Samir Costello, Anthony Denaxas, Spiros Flaxman, Seth Greenhalgh, Trisha Griffin, Stephen Hyde, Zoë Katzourakis, Aris McKee, Martin Michie, Susan Ratmann, Oliver Reicher, Stephen Scally, Gabriel Tomlinson, Christopher Yates, Christian Ziauddeen, Hisham Pagel, Christina J R Soc Med Research OBJECTIVE: To offer a quantitative risk–benefit analysis of two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among adolescents in England. SETTING: England. DESIGN: Following the risk–benefit analysis methodology carried out by the US Centers for Disease Control, we calculated historical rates of hospital admission, Intensive Care Unit admission and death for ascertained SARS-CoV-2 cases in children aged 12–17 in England. We then used these rates alongside a range of estimates for incidence of long COVID, vaccine efficacy and vaccine-induced myocarditis, to estimate hospital and Intensive Care Unit admissions, deaths and cases of long COVID over a period of 16 weeks under assumptions of high and low case incidence. PARTICIPANTS: All 12–17 year olds with a record of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in England between 1 July 2020 and 31 March 2021 using national linked electronic health records, accessed through the British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalisations, Intensive Care Unit admissions, deaths and cases of long COVID averted by vaccinating all 12–17 year olds in England over a 16-week period under different estimates of future case incidence. RESULTS: At high future case incidence of 1000/100,000 population/week over 16 weeks, vaccination could avert 4430 hospital admissions and 36 deaths over 16 weeks. At the low incidence of 50/100,000/week, vaccination could avert 70 hospital admissions and two deaths over 16 weeks. The benefit of vaccination in terms of hospitalisations in adolescents outweighs risks unless case rates are sustainably very low (below 30/100,000 teenagers/week). Benefit of vaccination exists at any case rate for the outcomes of death and long COVID, since neither have been associated with vaccination to date. CONCLUSIONS: Given the current (as at 15 September 2021) high case rates (680/100,000 population/week in 10–19 year olds) in England, our findings support vaccination of adolescents against SARS-CoV2. SAGE Publications 2021-11-01 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8649477/ /pubmed/34723680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01410768211052589 Text en © The Royal Society of Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Gurdasani, Deepti Bhatt, Samir Costello, Anthony Denaxas, Spiros Flaxman, Seth Greenhalgh, Trisha Griffin, Stephen Hyde, Zoë Katzourakis, Aris McKee, Martin Michie, Susan Ratmann, Oliver Reicher, Stephen Scally, Gabriel Tomlinson, Christopher Yates, Christian Ziauddeen, Hisham Pagel, Christina Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit analysis |
title | Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit
analysis |
title_full | Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit
analysis |
title_fullStr | Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit
analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit
analysis |
title_short | Vaccinating adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 in England: a risk–benefit
analysis |
title_sort | vaccinating adolescents against sars-cov-2 in england: a risk–benefit
analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01410768211052589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gurdasanideepti vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT bhattsamir vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT costelloanthony vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT denaxasspiros vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT flaxmanseth vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT greenhalghtrisha vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT griffinstephen vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT hydezoe vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT katzourakisaris vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT mckeemartin vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT michiesusan vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT ratmannoliver vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT reicherstephen vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT scallygabriel vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT tomlinsonchristopher vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT yateschristian vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT ziauddeenhisham vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis AT pagelchristina vaccinatingadolescentsagainstsarscov2inenglandariskbenefitanalysis |