Cargando…

Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: Women are less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) than men. A potential reason is risk aversion because of the worse outcomes with pPCI among women. However, whether pPCI is associated with a comparable mortality benefit in men and women remains unknown....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sulaiman, Samian, Kawsara, Akram, Mohamed, Mohamed O., Van Spall, Harriette G. C., Sutton, Nadia, Holmes, David R., Mamas, Mamas A., Alkhouli, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021638
_version_ 1784611013662867456
author Sulaiman, Samian
Kawsara, Akram
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Van Spall, Harriette G. C.
Sutton, Nadia
Holmes, David R.
Mamas, Mamas A.
Alkhouli, Mohamad
author_facet Sulaiman, Samian
Kawsara, Akram
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Van Spall, Harriette G. C.
Sutton, Nadia
Holmes, David R.
Mamas, Mamas A.
Alkhouli, Mohamad
author_sort Sulaiman, Samian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women are less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) than men. A potential reason is risk aversion because of the worse outcomes with pPCI among women. However, whether pPCI is associated with a comparable mortality benefit in men and women remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction in the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2018). We used propensity‐score matching to calculate average treatment effects of pPCI for in‐hospital mortality, major complications, length of stay, and cost. As a sensitivity analysis, we used logit models followed by a marginal command to calculate the average marginal effect. We included 413 500 weighted hospitalizations (30.7% women, 69.3% men). Women had more comorbidities except smoking and prior sternotomy. Compared with men, women were less likely to undergo angiography (81.0% versus 87.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74–0.81; P<0.001) or pPCI (74.0% versus 82.0%; adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73–0.79; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in average treatment effects of pPCI on mortality between men (−8.4% [−9.3% to −7.6%], P<0.001), and women (−9.5% [−10.8% to −8.3%], P<0.001) (P interaction=0.16). This persisted in age‐stratified analyses (≥85, 65–84, 45–64, <45 years) and sensitivity analysis, excluding emergent admissions. The average treatment effects of pPCI on major complications were comparable except for acute stroke, leaving against medical advice, and palliative encounter. There were no differences in the average treatment effects of pPCI on length of stay, but the proportional increase in cost with pPCI was higher in women. CONCLUSIONS: pPCI results in a comparable reduction in in‐hospital mortality in men and women. Nonetheless, risk‐adjusted rates of pPCI remain lower in women in contemporary US practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8649522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86495222021-12-20 Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Sulaiman, Samian Kawsara, Akram Mohamed, Mohamed O. Van Spall, Harriette G. C. Sutton, Nadia Holmes, David R. Mamas, Mamas A. Alkhouli, Mohamad J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Women are less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) than men. A potential reason is risk aversion because of the worse outcomes with pPCI among women. However, whether pPCI is associated with a comparable mortality benefit in men and women remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction in the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2018). We used propensity‐score matching to calculate average treatment effects of pPCI for in‐hospital mortality, major complications, length of stay, and cost. As a sensitivity analysis, we used logit models followed by a marginal command to calculate the average marginal effect. We included 413 500 weighted hospitalizations (30.7% women, 69.3% men). Women had more comorbidities except smoking and prior sternotomy. Compared with men, women were less likely to undergo angiography (81.0% versus 87.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74–0.81; P<0.001) or pPCI (74.0% versus 82.0%; adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73–0.79; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in average treatment effects of pPCI on mortality between men (−8.4% [−9.3% to −7.6%], P<0.001), and women (−9.5% [−10.8% to −8.3%], P<0.001) (P interaction=0.16). This persisted in age‐stratified analyses (≥85, 65–84, 45–64, <45 years) and sensitivity analysis, excluding emergent admissions. The average treatment effects of pPCI on major complications were comparable except for acute stroke, leaving against medical advice, and palliative encounter. There were no differences in the average treatment effects of pPCI on length of stay, but the proportional increase in cost with pPCI was higher in women. CONCLUSIONS: pPCI results in a comparable reduction in in‐hospital mortality in men and women. Nonetheless, risk‐adjusted rates of pPCI remain lower in women in contemporary US practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8649522/ /pubmed/34533043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021638 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sulaiman, Samian
Kawsara, Akram
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Van Spall, Harriette G. C.
Sutton, Nadia
Holmes, David R.
Mamas, Mamas A.
Alkhouli, Mohamad
Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men Versus Women With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort treatment effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in men versus women with st‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021638
work_keys_str_mv AT sulaimansamian treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT kawsaraakram treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mohamedmohamedo treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT vanspallharriettegc treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT suttonnadia treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT holmesdavidr treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mamasmamasa treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT alkhoulimohamad treatmenteffectofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenversuswomenwithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction