Cargando…
Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend at least 6 months of antithrombotic therapy and antibiotic prophylaxis after septal‐occluding device deployment in transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. It has been estimated that it takes ≈6 months for complete neo‐endothelialization; however, neo‐e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019282 |
_version_ | 1784611019716296704 |
---|---|
author | Tanabe, Yasuhiro Suzuki, Tomomi Kuwata, Shingo Izumo, Masaki Kawaguchi, Hiromasa Ogoda, Shun Kotoku, Nozomi Sato, Yukio Nishikawa, Haruka Kaihara, Toshiki Koga, Masashi Mitarai, Takanobu Okuyama, Kazuaki Kamijima, Ryo Ishibashi, Yuki Yoneyama, Kihei Higuma, Takumi Harada, Tomoo Akashi, Yoshihiro J. |
author_facet | Tanabe, Yasuhiro Suzuki, Tomomi Kuwata, Shingo Izumo, Masaki Kawaguchi, Hiromasa Ogoda, Shun Kotoku, Nozomi Sato, Yukio Nishikawa, Haruka Kaihara, Toshiki Koga, Masashi Mitarai, Takanobu Okuyama, Kazuaki Kamijima, Ryo Ishibashi, Yuki Yoneyama, Kihei Higuma, Takumi Harada, Tomoo Akashi, Yoshihiro J. |
author_sort | Tanabe, Yasuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend at least 6 months of antithrombotic therapy and antibiotic prophylaxis after septal‐occluding device deployment in transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. It has been estimated that it takes ≈6 months for complete neo‐endothelialization; however, neo‐endothelialization has not previously been assessed in vivo in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: The neointimal coverage of septal occluder devices was evaluated 6 months after implantation in 15 patients by angioscopy from the right atrium. Each occluder surface was divided into 9 areas; the levels of endothelialization in each area were semiquantitatively assessed by 4‐point grades. Device neo‐endothelialization was sufficient in two thirds of patients, but insufficient in one third. In the comparison between patients with sufficiently endothelialized devices of average grade score ≥2 (good endothelialization group, n=10) and those with poorly endothelialized devices of average grade score <2 (poor endothelialization group, n=5), those in the poor endothelialization group had larger devices deployed (27.0 mm [25.0–31.5 mm] versus 17.0 mm [15.6–22.5 mm], respectively) and progressive right heart dilatation. The endothelialization was poorer around the central areas. Moreover, the prevalence of thrombus formation on the devices was higher in the poorly endothelialized areas than in the sufficiently endothelialized areas (Grade 0, 94.1%; Grade 1, 63.2%; Grade 2, 0%; Grade 3, 1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Neo‐endothelialization on the closure devices varied 6 months after implantation. Notably, poor endothelialization and thrombus attachment were observed around the central areas and on the larger devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8649546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86495462021-12-20 Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization Tanabe, Yasuhiro Suzuki, Tomomi Kuwata, Shingo Izumo, Masaki Kawaguchi, Hiromasa Ogoda, Shun Kotoku, Nozomi Sato, Yukio Nishikawa, Haruka Kaihara, Toshiki Koga, Masashi Mitarai, Takanobu Okuyama, Kazuaki Kamijima, Ryo Ishibashi, Yuki Yoneyama, Kihei Higuma, Takumi Harada, Tomoo Akashi, Yoshihiro J. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend at least 6 months of antithrombotic therapy and antibiotic prophylaxis after septal‐occluding device deployment in transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. It has been estimated that it takes ≈6 months for complete neo‐endothelialization; however, neo‐endothelialization has not previously been assessed in vivo in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: The neointimal coverage of septal occluder devices was evaluated 6 months after implantation in 15 patients by angioscopy from the right atrium. Each occluder surface was divided into 9 areas; the levels of endothelialization in each area were semiquantitatively assessed by 4‐point grades. Device neo‐endothelialization was sufficient in two thirds of patients, but insufficient in one third. In the comparison between patients with sufficiently endothelialized devices of average grade score ≥2 (good endothelialization group, n=10) and those with poorly endothelialized devices of average grade score <2 (poor endothelialization group, n=5), those in the poor endothelialization group had larger devices deployed (27.0 mm [25.0–31.5 mm] versus 17.0 mm [15.6–22.5 mm], respectively) and progressive right heart dilatation. The endothelialization was poorer around the central areas. Moreover, the prevalence of thrombus formation on the devices was higher in the poorly endothelialized areas than in the sufficiently endothelialized areas (Grade 0, 94.1%; Grade 1, 63.2%; Grade 2, 0%; Grade 3, 1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Neo‐endothelialization on the closure devices varied 6 months after implantation. Notably, poor endothelialization and thrombus attachment were observed around the central areas and on the larger devices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8649546/ /pubmed/34533044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019282 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tanabe, Yasuhiro Suzuki, Tomomi Kuwata, Shingo Izumo, Masaki Kawaguchi, Hiromasa Ogoda, Shun Kotoku, Nozomi Sato, Yukio Nishikawa, Haruka Kaihara, Toshiki Koga, Masashi Mitarai, Takanobu Okuyama, Kazuaki Kamijima, Ryo Ishibashi, Yuki Yoneyama, Kihei Higuma, Takumi Harada, Tomoo Akashi, Yoshihiro J. Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization |
title | Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization |
title_full | Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization |
title_fullStr | Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization |
title_full_unstemmed | Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization |
title_short | Angioscopic Evaluation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device Neo‐Endothelialization |
title_sort | angioscopic evaluation of atrial septal defect closure device neo‐endothelialization |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanabeyasuhiro angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT suzukitomomi angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT kuwatashingo angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT izumomasaki angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT kawaguchihiromasa angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT ogodashun angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT kotokunozomi angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT satoyukio angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT nishikawaharuka angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT kaiharatoshiki angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT kogamasashi angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT mitaraitakanobu angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT okuyamakazuaki angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT kamijimaryo angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT ishibashiyuki angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT yoneyamakihei angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT higumatakumi angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT haradatomoo angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization AT akashiyoshihiroj angioscopicevaluationofatrialseptaldefectclosuredeviceneoendothelialization |