Cargando…
Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and tes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2 |
_version_ | 1784611166084923392 |
---|---|
author | Simm, Jaak Humbeck, Lina Zalewski, Adam Sturm, Noe Heyndrickx, Wouter Moreau, Yves Beck, Bernd Schuffenhauer, Ansgar |
author_facet | Simm, Jaak Humbeck, Lina Zalewski, Adam Sturm, Noe Heyndrickx, Wouter Moreau, Yves Beck, Bernd Schuffenhauer, Ansgar |
author_sort | Simm, Jaak |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and test set such that the performance on the test set is meaningful to infer the performance in a prospective application. This challenge is by its own very interesting and relevant, but is even more complex in a federated machine learning approach where multiple partners jointly train a model under privacy-preserving conditions where chemical structures must not be shared between the different participating parties. In this work we discuss three methods which provide a splitting of a data set and are applicable in a federated privacy-preserving setting, namely: a. locality-sensitive hashing (LSH), b. sphere exclusion clustering, c. scaffold-based binning (scaffold network). For evaluation of these splitting methods we consider the following quality criteria (compared to random splitting): bias in prediction performance, classification label and data imbalance, similarity distance between the test and training set compounds. The main findings of the paper are a. both sphere exclusion clustering and scaffold-based binning result in high quality splitting of the data sets, b. in terms of compute costs sphere exclusion clustering is very expensive in the case of federated privacy-preserving setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8650276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86502762021-12-07 Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning Simm, Jaak Humbeck, Lina Zalewski, Adam Sturm, Noe Heyndrickx, Wouter Moreau, Yves Beck, Bernd Schuffenhauer, Ansgar J Cheminform Research Article With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and test set such that the performance on the test set is meaningful to infer the performance in a prospective application. This challenge is by its own very interesting and relevant, but is even more complex in a federated machine learning approach where multiple partners jointly train a model under privacy-preserving conditions where chemical structures must not be shared between the different participating parties. In this work we discuss three methods which provide a splitting of a data set and are applicable in a federated privacy-preserving setting, namely: a. locality-sensitive hashing (LSH), b. sphere exclusion clustering, c. scaffold-based binning (scaffold network). For evaluation of these splitting methods we consider the following quality criteria (compared to random splitting): bias in prediction performance, classification label and data imbalance, similarity distance between the test and training set compounds. The main findings of the paper are a. both sphere exclusion clustering and scaffold-based binning result in high quality splitting of the data sets, b. in terms of compute costs sphere exclusion clustering is very expensive in the case of federated privacy-preserving setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8650276/ /pubmed/34876230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Simm, Jaak Humbeck, Lina Zalewski, Adam Sturm, Noe Heyndrickx, Wouter Moreau, Yves Beck, Bernd Schuffenhauer, Ansgar Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
title | Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
title_full | Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
title_fullStr | Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
title_short | Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
title_sort | splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simmjaak splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT humbecklina splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT zalewskiadam splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT sturmnoe splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT heyndrickxwouter splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT moreauyves splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT beckbernd splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning AT schuffenhaueransgar splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning |