Cargando…

Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning

With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simm, Jaak, Humbeck, Lina, Zalewski, Adam, Sturm, Noe, Heyndrickx, Wouter, Moreau, Yves, Beck, Bernd, Schuffenhauer, Ansgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2
_version_ 1784611166084923392
author Simm, Jaak
Humbeck, Lina
Zalewski, Adam
Sturm, Noe
Heyndrickx, Wouter
Moreau, Yves
Beck, Bernd
Schuffenhauer, Ansgar
author_facet Simm, Jaak
Humbeck, Lina
Zalewski, Adam
Sturm, Noe
Heyndrickx, Wouter
Moreau, Yves
Beck, Bernd
Schuffenhauer, Ansgar
author_sort Simm, Jaak
collection PubMed
description With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and test set such that the performance on the test set is meaningful to infer the performance in a prospective application. This challenge is by its own very interesting and relevant, but is even more complex in a federated machine learning approach where multiple partners jointly train a model under privacy-preserving conditions where chemical structures must not be shared between the different participating parties. In this work we discuss three methods which provide a splitting of a data set and are applicable in a federated privacy-preserving setting, namely: a. locality-sensitive hashing (LSH), b. sphere exclusion clustering, c. scaffold-based binning (scaffold network). For evaluation of these splitting methods we consider the following quality criteria (compared to random splitting): bias in prediction performance, classification label and data imbalance, similarity distance between the test and training set compounds. The main findings of the paper are a. both sphere exclusion clustering and scaffold-based binning result in high quality splitting of the data sets, b. in terms of compute costs sphere exclusion clustering is very expensive in the case of federated privacy-preserving setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8650276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86502762021-12-07 Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning Simm, Jaak Humbeck, Lina Zalewski, Adam Sturm, Noe Heyndrickx, Wouter Moreau, Yves Beck, Bernd Schuffenhauer, Ansgar J Cheminform Research Article With the increase in applications of machine learning methods in drug design and related fields, the challenge of designing sound test sets becomes more and more prominent. The goal of this challenge is to have a realistic split of chemical structures (compounds) between training, validation and test set such that the performance on the test set is meaningful to infer the performance in a prospective application. This challenge is by its own very interesting and relevant, but is even more complex in a federated machine learning approach where multiple partners jointly train a model under privacy-preserving conditions where chemical structures must not be shared between the different participating parties. In this work we discuss three methods which provide a splitting of a data set and are applicable in a federated privacy-preserving setting, namely: a. locality-sensitive hashing (LSH), b. sphere exclusion clustering, c. scaffold-based binning (scaffold network). For evaluation of these splitting methods we consider the following quality criteria (compared to random splitting): bias in prediction performance, classification label and data imbalance, similarity distance between the test and training set compounds. The main findings of the paper are a. both sphere exclusion clustering and scaffold-based binning result in high quality splitting of the data sets, b. in terms of compute costs sphere exclusion clustering is very expensive in the case of federated privacy-preserving setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8650276/ /pubmed/34876230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simm, Jaak
Humbeck, Lina
Zalewski, Adam
Sturm, Noe
Heyndrickx, Wouter
Moreau, Yves
Beck, Bernd
Schuffenhauer, Ansgar
Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
title Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
title_full Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
title_fullStr Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
title_short Splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
title_sort splitting chemical structure data sets for federated privacy-preserving machine learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00576-2
work_keys_str_mv AT simmjaak splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT humbecklina splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT zalewskiadam splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT sturmnoe splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT heyndrickxwouter splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT moreauyves splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT beckbernd splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning
AT schuffenhaueransgar splittingchemicalstructuredatasetsforfederatedprivacypreservingmachinelearning