Cargando…
Comparing the impact on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction critical patients of using midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine for sedation
BACKGROUND: There are less studies focusing on the sedative therapy of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) critical patients. This study aim to compare the impact on the prognosis of AMI critical patients of using midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine. METHODS: We collected clinical data from the Me...
Autores principales: | Jiang, Xiaowei, Yan, Min |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02385-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation
por: Turunen, Heidi, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparative evaluation of midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and propofol as Intensive Care Unit sedatives in postoperative electively ventilated eclamptic patients
por: Rashid, Malik Rameez, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Propofol Alone versus Propofol in Combination with Midazolam for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients with Paradoxical Reactions to Midazolam
por: Nam, Ji Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Propofol versus Midazolam for Sedation during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children
por: Oh, Ji Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Dexmedetomidine or midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized double blind prospective study
por: Koruk, Senem, et al.
Publicado: (2020)