Cargando…
Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial
BACKGROUND: Composite responder endpoints feature frequently in rheumatology due to the multifaceted nature of many of these conditions. Current analysis methods used to analyse these endpoints discard much of the data used to classify patients as responders and are therefore highly inefficient, res...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-021-00224-0 |
_version_ | 1784611190888988672 |
---|---|
author | McMenamin, Martina Grayling, Michael J. Berglind, Anna Wason, James M. S. |
author_facet | McMenamin, Martina Grayling, Michael J. Berglind, Anna Wason, James M. S. |
author_sort | McMenamin, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Composite responder endpoints feature frequently in rheumatology due to the multifaceted nature of many of these conditions. Current analysis methods used to analyse these endpoints discard much of the data used to classify patients as responders and are therefore highly inefficient, resulting in low power. We highlight a novel augmented methodology that uses more of the information available to improve the precision of reported treatment effects. Since these methods are more challenging to implement, we developed free, user-friendly software available in a web-based interface and as R packages. The software consists of two programs: one that supports the analysis of responder endpoints; the second that facilitates sample size estimation. We demonstrate the use of the software to conduct the analysis with both the augmented and standard analysis method using the MUSE study, a phase IIb trial in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. RESULTS: The software outputs similar point estimates with smaller confidence intervals for the odds ratio, risk ratio and risk difference estimators using the augmented approach. The sample size required in each arm for a future trial using the novel approach based on the MUSE data is 50 versus 135 for the standard method, translating to a reduction in required sample size of approximately 63%. CONCLUSIONS: We encourage trialists to use the software demonstrated to implement the augmented methodology in future studies to improve efficiency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00224-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8650391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86503912021-12-07 Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial McMenamin, Martina Grayling, Michael J. Berglind, Anna Wason, James M. S. BMC Rheumatol Software BACKGROUND: Composite responder endpoints feature frequently in rheumatology due to the multifaceted nature of many of these conditions. Current analysis methods used to analyse these endpoints discard much of the data used to classify patients as responders and are therefore highly inefficient, resulting in low power. We highlight a novel augmented methodology that uses more of the information available to improve the precision of reported treatment effects. Since these methods are more challenging to implement, we developed free, user-friendly software available in a web-based interface and as R packages. The software consists of two programs: one that supports the analysis of responder endpoints; the second that facilitates sample size estimation. We demonstrate the use of the software to conduct the analysis with both the augmented and standard analysis method using the MUSE study, a phase IIb trial in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. RESULTS: The software outputs similar point estimates with smaller confidence intervals for the odds ratio, risk ratio and risk difference estimators using the augmented approach. The sample size required in each arm for a future trial using the novel approach based on the MUSE data is 50 versus 135 for the standard method, translating to a reduction in required sample size of approximately 63%. CONCLUSIONS: We encourage trialists to use the software demonstrated to implement the augmented methodology in future studies to improve efficiency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00224-0. BioMed Central 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8650391/ /pubmed/34872620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-021-00224-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Software McMenamin, Martina Grayling, Michael J. Berglind, Anna Wason, James M. S. Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
title | Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
title_full | Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
title_fullStr | Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
title_full_unstemmed | Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
title_short | Increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
title_sort | increasing power in the analysis of responder endpoints in rheumatology: a software tutorial |
topic | Software |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34872620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-021-00224-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmenaminmartina increasingpowerintheanalysisofresponderendpointsinrheumatologyasoftwaretutorial AT graylingmichaelj increasingpowerintheanalysisofresponderendpointsinrheumatologyasoftwaretutorial AT berglindanna increasingpowerintheanalysisofresponderendpointsinrheumatologyasoftwaretutorial AT wasonjamesms increasingpowerintheanalysisofresponderendpointsinrheumatologyasoftwaretutorial |