Cargando…

Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia is a topic of intense ethical debate and it is illegal in most countries at present, including Sri Lanka. The aim of this descriptive cross-sectional study of medical students and practicing doctors was to explore the acceptance of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herath, H. M. M. T. B., Wijayawardhana, K. W. S. M., Wickramarachchi, U. I., Rodrigo, Chaturaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2
_version_ 1784611216448028672
author Herath, H. M. M. T. B.
Wijayawardhana, K. W. S. M.
Wickramarachchi, U. I.
Rodrigo, Chaturaka
author_facet Herath, H. M. M. T. B.
Wijayawardhana, K. W. S. M.
Wickramarachchi, U. I.
Rodrigo, Chaturaka
author_sort Herath, H. M. M. T. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Euthanasia is a topic of intense ethical debate and it is illegal in most countries at present, including Sri Lanka. The aim of this descriptive cross-sectional study of medical students and practicing doctors was to explore the acceptance of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS), and factors influencing this opinion. METHODS: A customised online questionnaire which explored opinions on euthanasia was administered to first and final year medical undergraduates in University of Colombo and practicing doctors with more than 5 years of work experience at The National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Attitudes on euthanasia and PAS were also assessed with the attitudes towards euthanasia (ATE) Scale, which is a 10-item questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 425 individuals responded (males: 178, 42%, age: median – 27 years), which included 143 (33.6%) first-year medical undergraduates, 141 (33.2%) final-year medical undergraduates and 141 (33.2%) practicing doctors. More participants (200, 47.1%) favoured legalizing euthanasia than those directly opposing it (110, 25.9%), but a significant proportion (27%) remained undecided. The mean scores of ATE questionnaire from the whole sample were generally unfavourable towards euthanasia/PAS. Accepting euthanasia as an option for oneself (p =  < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of favouring euthanasia/PAS or supporting its legalization. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional survey, more respondents supported legalisation of euthanasia in Sri Lanka than those openly opposing it. Yet, a significant minority that responded as “undecided” for legalisation, were more likely to have unfavourable ATE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8650524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86505242021-12-07 Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study Herath, H. M. M. T. B. Wijayawardhana, K. W. S. M. Wickramarachchi, U. I. Rodrigo, Chaturaka BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: Euthanasia is a topic of intense ethical debate and it is illegal in most countries at present, including Sri Lanka. The aim of this descriptive cross-sectional study of medical students and practicing doctors was to explore the acceptance of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS), and factors influencing this opinion. METHODS: A customised online questionnaire which explored opinions on euthanasia was administered to first and final year medical undergraduates in University of Colombo and practicing doctors with more than 5 years of work experience at The National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Attitudes on euthanasia and PAS were also assessed with the attitudes towards euthanasia (ATE) Scale, which is a 10-item questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 425 individuals responded (males: 178, 42%, age: median – 27 years), which included 143 (33.6%) first-year medical undergraduates, 141 (33.2%) final-year medical undergraduates and 141 (33.2%) practicing doctors. More participants (200, 47.1%) favoured legalizing euthanasia than those directly opposing it (110, 25.9%), but a significant proportion (27%) remained undecided. The mean scores of ATE questionnaire from the whole sample were generally unfavourable towards euthanasia/PAS. Accepting euthanasia as an option for oneself (p =  < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of favouring euthanasia/PAS or supporting its legalization. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional survey, more respondents supported legalisation of euthanasia in Sri Lanka than those openly opposing it. Yet, a significant minority that responded as “undecided” for legalisation, were more likely to have unfavourable ATE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2. BioMed Central 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8650524/ /pubmed/34876119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Herath, H. M. M. T. B.
Wijayawardhana, K. W. S. M.
Wickramarachchi, U. I.
Rodrigo, Chaturaka
Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study
title Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study
title_full Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study
title_fullStr Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study
title_short Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study
title_sort attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in sri lanka: a cross sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2
work_keys_str_mv AT herathhmmtb attitudesoneuthanasiaamongmedicalstudentsanddoctorsinsrilankaacrosssectionalstudy
AT wijayawardhanakwsm attitudesoneuthanasiaamongmedicalstudentsanddoctorsinsrilankaacrosssectionalstudy
AT wickramarachchiui attitudesoneuthanasiaamongmedicalstudentsanddoctorsinsrilankaacrosssectionalstudy
AT rodrigochaturaka attitudesoneuthanasiaamongmedicalstudentsanddoctorsinsrilankaacrosssectionalstudy