Cargando…

Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether anatomical variations of acetabulum were associated to idiopathic osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and March 2020, a total of 46 patients (32 males, 14 females; mean age: 43 years; range, 18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günay, Cüneyd, Özçelik, Abdurrahman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842092
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.273
_version_ 1784611245721124864
author Günay, Cüneyd
Özçelik, Abdurrahman
author_facet Günay, Cüneyd
Özçelik, Abdurrahman
author_sort Günay, Cüneyd
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether anatomical variations of acetabulum were associated to idiopathic osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and March 2020, a total of 46 patients (32 males, 14 females; mean age: 43 years; range, 18 to 66 years) who were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral ON of the hip joint and 44 healthy age- and sex-matched controls (30 males, 14 females; mean age: 46 years; range, 18 to 79 years) with no signs of ON of the hip joint were retrospectively analyzed. For both groups, measurements were taken of the anatomic parameters, including the acetabular version angle (VA), the sharp angle (SA), and the center-edge angle (CEA) on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. RESULTS: The mean VA of both hips was found to be significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2 on both MRI and X-ray (14.9±4.1 and 14.4±3.1 vs. 17.3±3.9 and 18.0±3.7, respectively; p=0.004, p<0.001). The mean SA of both hips was found to be significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2 on both MRI and X-ray (39.0±2.9 and 38.9±2.8 vs. 41.6±3.9 and 40.8±4.9, respectively; p=0.001, p=0.036). The mean CEA of both hips was found to be significantly larger in ON group than in control group on both MRI and X-ray (36.7±6.1 and 36.9±7.0 vs. 32.0±6.0 and 31.5±7.5, respectively; p<0.001, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Version angles were found to be smaller in patients with ON and more acetabular coverage was observed. Greater coverage of the acetabulum may indicate early collapses of the femoral head even in Stage 2 ON patients. The smaller version angles may be associated with ON.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8650656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86506562021-12-13 Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods? Günay, Cüneyd Özçelik, Abdurrahman Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether anatomical variations of acetabulum were associated to idiopathic osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and March 2020, a total of 46 patients (32 males, 14 females; mean age: 43 years; range, 18 to 66 years) who were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral ON of the hip joint and 44 healthy age- and sex-matched controls (30 males, 14 females; mean age: 46 years; range, 18 to 79 years) with no signs of ON of the hip joint were retrospectively analyzed. For both groups, measurements were taken of the anatomic parameters, including the acetabular version angle (VA), the sharp angle (SA), and the center-edge angle (CEA) on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. RESULTS: The mean VA of both hips was found to be significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2 on both MRI and X-ray (14.9±4.1 and 14.4±3.1 vs. 17.3±3.9 and 18.0±3.7, respectively; p=0.004, p<0.001). The mean SA of both hips was found to be significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2 on both MRI and X-ray (39.0±2.9 and 38.9±2.8 vs. 41.6±3.9 and 40.8±4.9, respectively; p=0.001, p=0.036). The mean CEA of both hips was found to be significantly larger in ON group than in control group on both MRI and X-ray (36.7±6.1 and 36.9±7.0 vs. 32.0±6.0 and 31.5±7.5, respectively; p<0.001, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Version angles were found to be smaller in patients with ON and more acetabular coverage was observed. Greater coverage of the acetabulum may indicate early collapses of the femoral head even in Stage 2 ON patients. The smaller version angles may be associated with ON. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8650656/ /pubmed/34842092 http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.273 Text en Copyright © 2021, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Günay, Cüneyd
Özçelik, Abdurrahman
Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
title Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
title_full Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
title_fullStr Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
title_full_unstemmed Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
title_short Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
title_sort is stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842092
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.273
work_keys_str_mv AT gunaycuneyd isstage2idiopathicosteonecrosisofthehipjointassociatedwithversionanglesonimagingmethods
AT ozcelikabdurrahman isstage2idiopathicosteonecrosisofthehipjointassociatedwithversionanglesonimagingmethods