Cargando…

Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study

Aims: Research conducted prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that remote psychotherapy is as effective as in-person treatment. At that time, it usually was the therapist’s individual choice to work remotely, whereas the pandemic pushed psychotherapists, including previous skeptics,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefan, Robert, Mantl, Gerd, Höfner, Claudia, Stammer, Julia, Hochgerner, Markus, Petersdorfer, Kathrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743430
_version_ 1784611418126942208
author Stefan, Robert
Mantl, Gerd
Höfner, Claudia
Stammer, Julia
Hochgerner, Markus
Petersdorfer, Kathrin
author_facet Stefan, Robert
Mantl, Gerd
Höfner, Claudia
Stammer, Julia
Hochgerner, Markus
Petersdorfer, Kathrin
author_sort Stefan, Robert
collection PubMed
description Aims: Research conducted prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that remote psychotherapy is as effective as in-person treatment. At that time, it usually was the therapist’s individual choice to work remotely, whereas the pandemic pushed psychotherapists, including previous skeptics, to incorporate remote work methods into their routine due to limited face-to-face contact. There is little knowledge of the way therapists experienced this sudden and forced transition to remote psychotherapy as the only treatment option. The present study aims to assess psychotherapists’ experience and proficiency delivering remote psychotherapy as well as to investigate perceived changes in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Methods: An online survey was administered to psychotherapists of the Austrian Association for Group Therapy and Group Dynamics (ÖAGG). Three test periods (t) were set (t1: April, 2020 with N = 175; t2: May–June, 2020 with N = 177; t3: November–December, 2020 with N = 113). Research was conducted longitudinally using a mixed-methods research design. Results: While psychotherapists’ levels of experience with telephone-based psychotherapy remained similar across all test periods, they became slightly more experienced using video therapy over the test period observed. However, they continued to feel less experienced compared to the use of telephone-based psychotherapy. The therapeutic relationship appeared to improve over the course of the first two test periods, while the third period showed a slight decline. No general deterioration of the psychotherapeutic relationship was found in the timespan studied. Conclusion: Despite many challenges and concerns, psychotherapists seem to adapt and enhance their skills in remote psychotherapy over time. The present paper confirms and enhances previous findings in the field due to its longitudinal approach. Remote psychotherapy can be a credible and trustworthy alternative to in-person treatment to be adopted and implemented on principle by a majority of psychotherapists regardless of their orientation. Furthermore, it sheds light on chances, problems und general observations regarding the comprehensive provision of remote psychotherapy in a pandemic situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8651537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86515372021-12-09 Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study Stefan, Robert Mantl, Gerd Höfner, Claudia Stammer, Julia Hochgerner, Markus Petersdorfer, Kathrin Front Psychol Psychology Aims: Research conducted prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that remote psychotherapy is as effective as in-person treatment. At that time, it usually was the therapist’s individual choice to work remotely, whereas the pandemic pushed psychotherapists, including previous skeptics, to incorporate remote work methods into their routine due to limited face-to-face contact. There is little knowledge of the way therapists experienced this sudden and forced transition to remote psychotherapy as the only treatment option. The present study aims to assess psychotherapists’ experience and proficiency delivering remote psychotherapy as well as to investigate perceived changes in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Methods: An online survey was administered to psychotherapists of the Austrian Association for Group Therapy and Group Dynamics (ÖAGG). Three test periods (t) were set (t1: April, 2020 with N = 175; t2: May–June, 2020 with N = 177; t3: November–December, 2020 with N = 113). Research was conducted longitudinally using a mixed-methods research design. Results: While psychotherapists’ levels of experience with telephone-based psychotherapy remained similar across all test periods, they became slightly more experienced using video therapy over the test period observed. However, they continued to feel less experienced compared to the use of telephone-based psychotherapy. The therapeutic relationship appeared to improve over the course of the first two test periods, while the third period showed a slight decline. No general deterioration of the psychotherapeutic relationship was found in the timespan studied. Conclusion: Despite many challenges and concerns, psychotherapists seem to adapt and enhance their skills in remote psychotherapy over time. The present paper confirms and enhances previous findings in the field due to its longitudinal approach. Remote psychotherapy can be a credible and trustworthy alternative to in-person treatment to be adopted and implemented on principle by a majority of psychotherapists regardless of their orientation. Furthermore, it sheds light on chances, problems und general observations regarding the comprehensive provision of remote psychotherapy in a pandemic situation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8651537/ /pubmed/34899484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743430 Text en Copyright © 2021 Stefan, Mantl, Höfner, Stammer, Hochgerner and Petersdorfer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Stefan, Robert
Mantl, Gerd
Höfner, Claudia
Stammer, Julia
Hochgerner, Markus
Petersdorfer, Kathrin
Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
title Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
title_full Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
title_fullStr Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
title_short Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Experiences With the Transition and the Therapeutic Relationship. A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study
title_sort remote psychotherapy during the covid-19 pandemic. experiences with the transition and the therapeutic relationship. a longitudinal mixed-methods study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743430
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanrobert remotepsychotherapyduringthecovid19pandemicexperienceswiththetransitionandthetherapeuticrelationshipalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy
AT mantlgerd remotepsychotherapyduringthecovid19pandemicexperienceswiththetransitionandthetherapeuticrelationshipalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy
AT hofnerclaudia remotepsychotherapyduringthecovid19pandemicexperienceswiththetransitionandthetherapeuticrelationshipalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy
AT stammerjulia remotepsychotherapyduringthecovid19pandemicexperienceswiththetransitionandthetherapeuticrelationshipalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy
AT hochgernermarkus remotepsychotherapyduringthecovid19pandemicexperienceswiththetransitionandthetherapeuticrelationshipalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy
AT petersdorferkathrin remotepsychotherapyduringthecovid19pandemicexperienceswiththetransitionandthetherapeuticrelationshipalongitudinalmixedmethodsstudy