Cargando…
Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials
2D electrode materials are often deployed on conductive supports for electrochemistry and there is a great need to understand fundamental electrochemical processes in this electrode configuration. Here, an integrated experimental-theoretical approach is used to resolve the key electronic interaction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27339-9 |
_version_ | 1784611466032185344 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Dan-Qing Kang, Minkyung Perry, David Chen, Chang-Hui West, Geoff Xia, Xue Chaudhuri, Shayantan Laker, Zachary P. L. Wilson, Neil R. Meloni, Gabriel N. Melander, Marko M. Maurer, Reinhard J. Unwin, Patrick R. |
author_facet | Liu, Dan-Qing Kang, Minkyung Perry, David Chen, Chang-Hui West, Geoff Xia, Xue Chaudhuri, Shayantan Laker, Zachary P. L. Wilson, Neil R. Meloni, Gabriel N. Melander, Marko M. Maurer, Reinhard J. Unwin, Patrick R. |
author_sort | Liu, Dan-Qing |
collection | PubMed |
description | 2D electrode materials are often deployed on conductive supports for electrochemistry and there is a great need to understand fundamental electrochemical processes in this electrode configuration. Here, an integrated experimental-theoretical approach is used to resolve the key electronic interactions in outer-sphere electron transfer (OS-ET), a cornerstone elementary electrochemical reaction, at graphene as-grown on a copper electrode. Using scanning electrochemical cell microscopy, and co-located structural microscopy, the classical hexaamineruthenium (III/II) couple shows the ET kinetics trend: monolayer > bilayer > multilayer graphene. This trend is rationalized quantitatively through the development of rate theory, using the Schmickler-Newns-Anderson model Hamiltonian for ET, with the explicit incorporation of electrostatic interactions in the double layer, and parameterized using constant potential density functional theory calculations. The ET mechanism is predominantly adiabatic; the addition of subsequent graphene layers increases the contact potential, producing an increase in the effective barrier to ET at the electrode/electrolyte interface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8651748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86517482021-12-27 Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials Liu, Dan-Qing Kang, Minkyung Perry, David Chen, Chang-Hui West, Geoff Xia, Xue Chaudhuri, Shayantan Laker, Zachary P. L. Wilson, Neil R. Meloni, Gabriel N. Melander, Marko M. Maurer, Reinhard J. Unwin, Patrick R. Nat Commun Article 2D electrode materials are often deployed on conductive supports for electrochemistry and there is a great need to understand fundamental electrochemical processes in this electrode configuration. Here, an integrated experimental-theoretical approach is used to resolve the key electronic interactions in outer-sphere electron transfer (OS-ET), a cornerstone elementary electrochemical reaction, at graphene as-grown on a copper electrode. Using scanning electrochemical cell microscopy, and co-located structural microscopy, the classical hexaamineruthenium (III/II) couple shows the ET kinetics trend: monolayer > bilayer > multilayer graphene. This trend is rationalized quantitatively through the development of rate theory, using the Schmickler-Newns-Anderson model Hamiltonian for ET, with the explicit incorporation of electrostatic interactions in the double layer, and parameterized using constant potential density functional theory calculations. The ET mechanism is predominantly adiabatic; the addition of subsequent graphene layers increases the contact potential, producing an increase in the effective barrier to ET at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8651748/ /pubmed/34876571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27339-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Dan-Qing Kang, Minkyung Perry, David Chen, Chang-Hui West, Geoff Xia, Xue Chaudhuri, Shayantan Laker, Zachary P. L. Wilson, Neil R. Meloni, Gabriel N. Melander, Marko M. Maurer, Reinhard J. Unwin, Patrick R. Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials |
title | Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials |
title_full | Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials |
title_fullStr | Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials |
title_short | Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials |
title_sort | adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2d electrode materials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27339-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liudanqing adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT kangminkyung adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT perrydavid adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT chenchanghui adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT westgeoff adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT xiaxue adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT chaudhurishayantan adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT lakerzacharypl adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT wilsonneilr adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT melonigabrieln adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT melandermarkom adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT maurerreinhardj adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials AT unwinpatrickr adiabaticversusnonadiabaticelectrontransferat2delectrodematerials |