Cargando…

Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Antihypertensive treatment may have different effects on central arterial hemodynamics. The extent of the difference in effects between various antihypertensive drugs remains undefined. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that explo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Yi-Bang, Xia, Jia-Hui, Li, Yan, Wang, Ji-Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8652138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.762586
_version_ 1784611529278095360
author Cheng, Yi-Bang
Xia, Jia-Hui
Li, Yan
Wang, Ji-Guang
author_facet Cheng, Yi-Bang
Xia, Jia-Hui
Li, Yan
Wang, Ji-Guang
author_sort Cheng, Yi-Bang
collection PubMed
description Background: Antihypertensive treatment may have different effects on central arterial hemodynamics. The extent of the difference in effects between various antihypertensive drugs remains undefined. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of antihypertensive agents on both central and peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) or central augmentation index, with a special focus on the comparison between newer [renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs)] and older antihypertensive agents (diuretics and β- and α-blockers). Results: In total, 20 studies (n = 2,498) were included. Compared with diuretics (10 studies), β-blockers (16 studies), or an α-blocker (1 study), RAS inhibitors (21 studies), and CCBs (6 studies) more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced both central and peripheral SBP by a weighted mean difference of −5.63 (−6.50 to −4.76 mmHg) and −1.97 mmHg (−2.99 to −0.95 mmHg), respectively. Compared with older agents, the newer agents also more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced central PP (−3.27 mmHg; −4.95 to −1.59 mmHg), augmentation index (−6.11%; −7.94 to −4.29) and augmentation (−3.35 mmHg; −5.28 to –1.42 mmHg) but not peripheral PP (p ≥ 0.09). Accordingly, the newer agents reduced central-to-peripheral PP amplification significantly less than the older agents (0.11 mmHg; 0.05 to 0.17 mmHg; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Newer agents, such as RAS inhibitors and CCBs, were significantly more efficacious than older agents in their effects on central hemodynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8652138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86521382021-12-09 Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Cheng, Yi-Bang Xia, Jia-Hui Li, Yan Wang, Ji-Guang Front Physiol Physiology Background: Antihypertensive treatment may have different effects on central arterial hemodynamics. The extent of the difference in effects between various antihypertensive drugs remains undefined. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of antihypertensive agents on both central and peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) or central augmentation index, with a special focus on the comparison between newer [renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs)] and older antihypertensive agents (diuretics and β- and α-blockers). Results: In total, 20 studies (n = 2,498) were included. Compared with diuretics (10 studies), β-blockers (16 studies), or an α-blocker (1 study), RAS inhibitors (21 studies), and CCBs (6 studies) more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced both central and peripheral SBP by a weighted mean difference of −5.63 (−6.50 to −4.76 mmHg) and −1.97 mmHg (−2.99 to −0.95 mmHg), respectively. Compared with older agents, the newer agents also more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced central PP (−3.27 mmHg; −4.95 to −1.59 mmHg), augmentation index (−6.11%; −7.94 to −4.29) and augmentation (−3.35 mmHg; −5.28 to –1.42 mmHg) but not peripheral PP (p ≥ 0.09). Accordingly, the newer agents reduced central-to-peripheral PP amplification significantly less than the older agents (0.11 mmHg; 0.05 to 0.17 mmHg; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Newer agents, such as RAS inhibitors and CCBs, were significantly more efficacious than older agents in their effects on central hemodynamics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8652138/ /pubmed/34899387 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.762586 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cheng, Xia, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Cheng, Yi-Bang
Xia, Jia-Hui
Li, Yan
Wang, Ji-Guang
Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort antihypertensive treatment and central arterial hemodynamics: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8652138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.762586
work_keys_str_mv AT chengyibang antihypertensivetreatmentandcentralarterialhemodynamicsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiajiahui antihypertensivetreatmentandcentralarterialhemodynamicsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liyan antihypertensivetreatmentandcentralarterialhemodynamicsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangjiguang antihypertensivetreatmentandcentralarterialhemodynamicsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials