Cargando…
Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions
Human joint action seems special, as it is grounded in joint commitment—a sense of mutual obligation participants feel towards each other. Comparative research with humans and non-human great apes has typically investigated joint commitment by experimentally interrupting joint actions to study subje...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8652280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211121 |
_version_ | 1784611562575626240 |
---|---|
author | Heesen, Raphaela Zuberbühler, Klaus Bangerter, Adrian Iglesias, Katia Rossano, Federico Pajot, Aude Guéry, Jean-Pascal Genty, Emilie |
author_facet | Heesen, Raphaela Zuberbühler, Klaus Bangerter, Adrian Iglesias, Katia Rossano, Federico Pajot, Aude Guéry, Jean-Pascal Genty, Emilie |
author_sort | Heesen, Raphaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human joint action seems special, as it is grounded in joint commitment—a sense of mutual obligation participants feel towards each other. Comparative research with humans and non-human great apes has typically investigated joint commitment by experimentally interrupting joint actions to study subjects’ resumption strategies. However, such experimental interruptions are human-induced, and thus the question remains of how great apes naturally handle interruptions. Here, we focus on naturally occurring interruptions of joint actions, grooming and play, in bonobos and chimpanzees. Similar to humans, both species frequently resumed interrupted joint actions (and the previous behaviours, like grooming the same body part region or playing the same play type) with their previous partners and at the previous location. Yet, the probability of resumption attempts was unaffected by social bonds or rank. Our data suggest that great apes experience something akin to joint commitment, for which we discuss possible evolutionary origins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8652280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86522802021-12-13 Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions Heesen, Raphaela Zuberbühler, Klaus Bangerter, Adrian Iglesias, Katia Rossano, Federico Pajot, Aude Guéry, Jean-Pascal Genty, Emilie R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Human joint action seems special, as it is grounded in joint commitment—a sense of mutual obligation participants feel towards each other. Comparative research with humans and non-human great apes has typically investigated joint commitment by experimentally interrupting joint actions to study subjects’ resumption strategies. However, such experimental interruptions are human-induced, and thus the question remains of how great apes naturally handle interruptions. Here, we focus on naturally occurring interruptions of joint actions, grooming and play, in bonobos and chimpanzees. Similar to humans, both species frequently resumed interrupted joint actions (and the previous behaviours, like grooming the same body part region or playing the same play type) with their previous partners and at the previous location. Yet, the probability of resumption attempts was unaffected by social bonds or rank. Our data suggest that great apes experience something akin to joint commitment, for which we discuss possible evolutionary origins. The Royal Society 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8652280/ /pubmed/34909217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211121 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Heesen, Raphaela Zuberbühler, Klaus Bangerter, Adrian Iglesias, Katia Rossano, Federico Pajot, Aude Guéry, Jean-Pascal Genty, Emilie Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
title | Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
title_full | Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
title_fullStr | Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
title_short | Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
title_sort | evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions |
topic | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8652280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heesenraphaela evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT zuberbuhlerklaus evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT bangerteradrian evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT iglesiaskatia evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT rossanofederico evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT pajotaude evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT gueryjeanpascal evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions AT gentyemilie evidenceofjointcommitmentingreatapesnaturaljointactions |